Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kafka v. Davidson, 160 N.W. 1021.

33 citing documents.

STATE BY SPANNAUS v. Belmont, Holmberg 384 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
STATE BY SPANNAUS v. Belmont, Holmberg 384 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
458 (1929); Kafka v. Davidson, 135 Minn. 389 , 160 N.W.
Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of Minnetonka 162 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 1968
Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of Minnetonka 162 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 1968
6 See, Kafka v. Davidson, 135 Minn. 389 , .
State v. Robinson 123 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1963
State v. Robinson 123 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1963
Kafka v. Davidson, 135 Minn. 389 , 394 , 160 N.W.
State Ex Rel. Willey v. Chun 372 P.2d 324 Ariz. 1962
State v. Rust 98 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1959
State v. Rust 98 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1959
Kafka v. District Court, 128 Minn. 432 , ; Kafka v. Davidson, 135 Minn. 389 , ; Eyre v. City of Faribault, 121 Minn. 233 , , L. R. A. 1917A, 685.
In Re Site for Library 254 Minn. 358 Minn. 1959
Korengold v. City of Minneapolis 95 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 1959
In Re Site for Library 254 Minn. 358 Minn. 1959
This court has held, beginning with Kafka v. Davidson, 135 Minn. 389 , 160 N.W.
Korengold v. City of Minneapolis 95 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 1959
257 , 65 N. W. [2d] 822): “In event the entire premises are taken, rental shall be paid to the date the tenant is ousted pursuant to such proceedings, and all the other covenants and conditions of this lease having been performed, this lease shall be void.” This court has held, beginning with Kafka v. Davidson, 135 Minn. 389 , , that it would not be competent for the lessee to prove the amount of his profits, the loss of profits, the depreciation of fixtures, or the expense of removal.
State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Barrett & Zimmerman, Inc. 36 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 1949
State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Barrett & Zimmerman, Inc. 36 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 1949
Kafka v. District Court, 128 Minn. 432, 436 , ; Kafka v. Davidson, 135 Minn. 389, 393 , ; Oronoco School Dist.
Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission v. Hedberg-Freidheim Co. 32 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 1948
Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission v. Hedberg-Freidheim Co. 32 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 1948
Seabloom v. Krier 18 N.W.2d 88 Minn. 1945
Seabloom v. Krier 18 N.W.2d 88 Minn. 1945
In so disposing of that issue, they were but following our decision in Kafka v. Davidson, 135 Minn. 389 , and 394, , and 1023, where we held that an award of damages in condemnation— “may be made in gross and be apportioned thereafter between the various parties in interest according to their interests”; that all such “parties are bound and concluded by the award as fixed and determined” in such condemnat
Hockman v. Lindgren 3 N.W.2d 492 Minn. 1942
Hockman v. Lindgren 3 N.W.2d 492 Minn. 1942
The appellant asserts that under the rule announced by this court in Kafka v. Davidson, 135 Minn. 389, 396 , , the trial court should have determined the value of the Hockmans’ leasehold interest in the condemned property and given that to them and all of the remainder to Lindgren.
Siggelkow v. Arnold 245 N.W. 629 Minn. 1932
Siggelkow v. Arnold 245 N.W. 629 Minn. 1932
Kafka v. Davidson, 135 Minn. 389 , .
In Re Improvement of Third Steeet, St. Paul. Buckbee-Mears Co. 228 N.W. 162 Minn. 1929
In Re Improvement of Third Steeet, St. Paul. Buckbee-Mears Co. 228 N.W. 162 Minn. 1929
The respondent and the court below deemed Kafka v. Davidson, 135 Minn. 389, 391 , , decisive against appellant’s recovering the $12,500.
In Re Assessment for Widening Third St. in St. Paul 223 N.W. 458 Minn. 1929
In Re Assessment for Widening Third St. in St. Paul 223 N.W. 458 Minn. 1929
Kafka v. Davidson, 135 Minn. 389 , .
Peterson v. City of Minneapolis 221 N.W. 14 Minn. 1928
Peterson v. City of Minneapolis 221 N.W. 14 Minn. 1928
144 ; Kafka v. Davidson, 135 Minn. 389 , 160 N.W.
Friedman Bros. Holding Co. v. Nathan 198 N.W. 460 Minn. 1924
Friedman Bros. Holding Co. v. Nathan 198 N.W. 460 Minn. 1924
In Kafka v. Davidson, 135 Minn. 389 , , it was recognized that the taking of leased property by condemnation for widening a street rendered it untenantable under the statute, justified the lessee in vacating, and that when he vacated he was released by the statute from the payment of rent.
Kafka v. Davidson 164 N.W. 980 Minn. 1917
Kafka v. Davidson 164 N.W. 980 Minn. 1917
Kafka v. Davidson, 135 Minn. 389 , .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by