DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Miller v. Maier, 161 N.W. 513.

29 citing documents.

  • Ortiz v. Gavenda 574 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • Ortiz v. Gavenda 574 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    584, 585 (1918) (by responding to merits of negligence action, defendant waived his objection to plaintiffs lack of legal capacity due to infancy); Miller v. Maier, 136 Minn. 231, 235 , 161 N.W.
  • Cochrane v. Tudor Oaks Condominium Project 529 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • Cochrane v. Tudor Oaks Condominium Project 529 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
    Miller v. Maier , 136 Minn. 231 , 161 N.W.
  • Appeal of Meyer v. Village of Waite Park 152 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1967
  • Appeal of Meyer v. Village of Waite Park 152 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1967
    In Miller v. Maier, 136 Minn. 231 , , 2 A. L. R. 399, and in In re Establishment of Judicial Ditch No. 75, 172 Minn. 295 , , , it was held that signers of a petition could not withdraw therefrom after the court had taken jurisdiction thereof and acted thereon.
  • Phillips v. Ericson 80 N.W.2d 513 Minn. 1957
  • Phillips v. Ericson 80 N.W.2d 513 Minn. 1957
    3 Miller v. Maier, 136 Minn. 231 , , 2 A. L. R. 399.
  • Bank v. Egan 60 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 1953
  • Bank v. Egan 60 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 1953
    Miller v. Maier, 136 Minn. 231 , , 2 A. L. R. 399; Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183 , .
  • In Re Dissolution of School District No. 33 60 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1953
  • In Re Dissolution of School District No. 33 60 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1953
    12 In re Establishment of Judicial Ditch No. 75, 172 Minn. 295 , , ; Miller v. Maier, 136 Minn. 231 , , 2 A. L. R. 399.
  • Hunt v. Rolloff 28 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1947
  • Miske v. Fischer 259 N.W. 18 Minn. 1935
  • Miske v. Fischer 259 N.W. 18 Minn. 1935
    This case is distinguishable from those relied upon and cited by appellant in his brief such as Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183 , ; Exrieder v. O’Keefe, 143 Minn. 278 , ; Flaten v. Kvale, 146 Minn. 463 , 179 * Miller v. Maier, 136 Minn. 231 , , 2 A. L. R.. 399.
  • Danculovic v. Zimmerman 238 N.W. 695 Minn. 1931
  • Danculovic v. Zimmerman 238 N.W. 695 Minn. 1931
    In Miller v. Maier, 136 Minn. 231 , , 2 A. L. R. 399, wherein was involved the corrupt practices act, no question as to its application to town elections was raised.
  • Anderson v. Firle 219 N.W. 284 Minn. 1928
  • Anderson v. Firle 219 N.W. 284 Minn. 1928
    In Miller v. Maier, 136 Minn. 231 , *Page 334 161 N.W.
  • Berg v. Penttila 217 N.W. 935 Minn. 1928
  • Berg v. Penttila 217 N.W. 935 Minn. 1928
    See Olsen v. Billberg, 129 Minn. 160 , ; Miller v. Maier, 136 Minn. 231 , , 2 A. L. R. 399; Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183 , .
  • In Re Election Contest of Christian 213 N.W. 48 Minn. 1927
  • In Re Election Contest of Christian 213 N.W. 48 Minn. 1927
    Miller v. Maier, 136 Minn. 231 , , 2 A. L. R. 399; Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183 , .
  • Mathison v. Meyer 199 N.W. 173 Minn. 1924
  • Mathison v. Meyer 199 N.W. 173 Minn. 1924
    Our decision in Miller v. Maier, 136 Minn. 231 , , 2 A. L. R. 399, is not out of harmony with our holding here, for, in that case, the question was not raised.
  • Exrieder v. O'Keefe 173 N.W. 434 Minn. 1919
  • Exrieder v. O'Keefe 173 N.W. 434 Minn. 1919
    In Miller v. Maier, 136 Minn. 231 , , where a similar contest was instituted and certain of the petitioners sought to withdraw their names from the petition on the ground that they had not fully understood its contents, the court said: “Contests of this character based upon a statutory petition, signed and sworn to by a large number of e
  • Hawley v. Wallace 163 N.W. 127 Minn. 1917
  • Hawley v. Wallace 163 N.W. 127 Minn. 1917
    It may be noted that the election contest is in its general characteristics a civil proceeding and it was so considered in Miller v. Maier, 136 Minn. 231 , , and Saari v. Gleason, 126 Minn. 378 , .