DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wood v. Wood, 163 N.W. 297.

28 citing documents.

  • In Re Guardianship of Stanger 217 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1974
  • Hartmann v. Whiteman 217 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1974
  • Hartmann v. Whiteman 217 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1974
    We see no reason for interference.” See, also, Swick v. Sheridan, 107 Minn. 130 , Prokosch v. Brust, 128 Minn. 324 , Wood v. Wood, 137 Minn 252, Hallenberg v. Hallenberg, 144 Minn. 39 , Wilkowske v. Lynch, 124 Minn. 492
  • In Re Guardianship of Stanger 217 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1974
    130 (1915); Wood v. Wood, 137 Minn. 252 , 163 N.W.
  • Burns v. Stewart 188 N.W.2d 760 Minn. 1971
  • Burns v. Stewart 188 N.W.2d 760 Minn. 1971
    The law does not favor divorce, and any agreement for divorce, or any collateral bargaining promotive of it, is unlawful and void.” 137 Minn. 231 , .
  • Teubner v. State 216 Minn. 553 Minn. 1944
  • In Re Restoration to Capacity of Masters 13 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 1944
  • In Re Restoration to Capacity of Masters 13 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 1944
    477 ; Wood v. Wood, 137 Minn. 252 , 163 N.W.
  • Teubner v. State 216 Minn. 553 Minn. 1944
    the general rules of judicial procedure.” Prokosch v. Brust, 128 Minn. 324, 327 , ; Hanson v. Kalstarud, 114 Minn. 489 , ; Wood v. Wood, 137 Minn. 252 , ; In re Guardianship of Buck, 171 Minn. 227 , ; In re Guardianship of Dahmen, 192 Minn. 407 , ; State Board of Control v. Fechner, 192 Minn. 412 , ; In re Guardianship of Strom, 205 Minn. 399, 402 , ; note, 91 A. L. R. 96.
  • Mitchell v. Bazille 13 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1944
  • Mitchell v. Bazille 13 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1944
    In the case of In re Guardianship of Wood, 140 Minn. 130, 132 , , after we bad afflrmed an order denying a motion for a new trial in Wood v. Wood, 137 Minn. 252 , , we held that “A new trial may be granted because of evidence of facts arising after the trial,” and we reversed upon that ground, even though the evidence was newly discovered not only after trial but after an appeal.
  • Czanstkowski v. Matter 6 N.W.2d 629 Minn. 1942
  • Czanstkowski v. Matter 6 N.W.2d 629 Minn. 1942
    That point is made for the first time in the dissent hereto upon the authority of Wood v. Wood, 137 Minn. 252 , , which reviewed an order of the district court in a case originating in the probate court where the single issue of competency was involved.
  • In Re Guardianship of Dahmen 256 N.W. 891 Minn. 1934
  • Dahmen v. Simmons 192 Minn. 407 Minn. 1934
  • In Re Guardianship of Dahmen 256 N.W. 891 Minn. 1934
    130 ; Wood v. Wood, 137 Minn. 252 , 163 N.W.
  • Dahmen v. Simmons 192 Minn. 407 Minn. 1934
    Other cases bearing upon this subject, amongst many, are the following: Prokosch v. Brust, 128 Minn. 324 , ; Wood v. Wood, 137 Minn. 252 , ; In re Guardianship of Hallenberg, 144 Minn. 39 , ; Wilkowske v. Lynch, 124 Minn. 492 , .
  • Buro v. Morse 237 N.W. 186 Minn. 1931
  • Buro v. Morse 237 N.W. 186 Minn. 1931
    Swick v. Sheridan, 107 Minn. 130 , ; Wood v. Wood, 137 Minn. 252 , .
  • In Re Estate of Waggner 214 N.W. 892 Minn. 1927
  • In Re Estate of Waggner 214 N.W. 892 Minn. 1927
    Swick v. Sheridan, 107 Minn. 130 , ; Wood v. Wood, 137 Minn. 252 , .
  • Pioneer Land & Loan Co. v. Bernard 195 N.W. 140 Minn. 1923
  • Pioneer Land & Loan Co. v. Bernard 195 N.W. 140 Minn. 1923
    That it permits no other was decided in Swick v. Sheridan, 107 Minn. 130 , , and Wood v. Wood, 137 Minn. 252 , .
  • Wood v. Connell 184 N.W. 955 Minn. 1921
  • Wood v. Connell 184 N.W. 955 Minn. 1921
    Wood v. Wood, 137 Minn. 252 , .
  • Wood v. Wood 167 N.W. 358 Minn. 1918
  • Wood v. Wood 167 N.W. 358 Minn. 1918
    Hallam, J. The facts of this case are stated in the opinion filed on the former appeal, 137 Minn. 252 , 163 N W. 297.