Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Boetcher v. Nelson, 137 Minn. 265.

28 citing documents.

In Re Termination of Gay 555 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re Termination of Gay 555 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
18, 20 (1926) (declining to discharge writ for lack of service where informal written notice was given adverse party within appeal period); Boetcher v. Nelson, 137 Minn. 265, 267 , 161 N.W.
In Re the Recommendation for Discharge of Brown 434 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Recommendation for Discharge of Brown 434 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Boetcher v. Nelson, 137 Minn. 265 , 161 N.W.
In re Schwarze 417 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In re Schwarze 417 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Boetcher v. Nelson, 137 Minn. 265, 273 , 163 N.W.
In Re Lateral 2-A of Judicial Ditch No. 36 185 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1971
Bauer v. Redwood County 185 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1971
In Re Lateral 2-A of Judicial Ditch No. 36 185 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1971
Boetcher v. Nelson, 137 Minn. 265 , 163 N.W.
Bauer v. Redwood County 185 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1971
Boetcher v. Nelson, 137 Minn. 265 , , and In re Judicial Ditch No. 9, 167 Minn. 10 , , although decided under earlier statutes governing drainage proceedings, are illustrative of the approach we have taken in these situations.
Johnson v. Board of County Commissioners 182 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 1971
Johnson v. Board of County Commissioners 182 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 1971
Boetcher v. Nelson, 137 Minn. 265, 273 , , , 513, ‘is one that is addressed to the judgment and discretion of the tribunal having jurisdiction of the matter, whose conclusions will be disturbed by the courts only when the evidence, taken as a whole, furnishes no legal basis for the decision of such tribunal.’ ” See, also, S
Black v. Northwestern Nat. Bank of Minneapolis 167 N.W.2d 147 Minn. 1969
Black v. Northwestern Nat. Bank of Minneapolis 167 N.W.2d 147 Minn. 1969
Boetcher v. Nelson, 137 Minn. 265, 273 , , , 513, “is one that is addressed to the judgment and discretion of the tribunal having jurisdiction of the matter, whose conclusions will be disturbed by the courts only when the evidence, taken as a whole, furnishes no legal basis for the decision of such tribunal.” The correctnes
State v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'N OF CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS 154 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1967
State v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'N OF CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS 154 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1967
Boetcher v. Nelson, 137 Minn. 265 , , , as controlling in favor of his contentions.
In Re Judicial Ditch No. 12 36 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1949
State ex rel. Great Northern Railway Co. v. District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District 36 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1949
State ex rel. Great Northern Railway Co. v. District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District 36 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1949
Boetcher v. Nelson, 137 Minn. 265 , , ; State ex rel.
In Re Judicial Ditch No. 12 36 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1949
Boetcher v. Nelson, 137 Minn. 265 , 161 N.W.
In Re Improvement and Repair of Judicial Ditch No. 10 214 N.W. 285 Minn. 1927
In Re Improvement and Repair of Judicial Ditch No. 10 214 N.W. 285 Minn. 1927
Boetcher v. Nelson, 137 Minn. 265 , , ; In re Judicial Ditch No. 12, 147 Minn. 290 , ; In re Judicial Ditch No. 35, 152 Minn. 352 , ; In re Judicial Ditch No. 9, 167 Minn. 10 , .
In Re Judicial Ditch No. 9 208 N.W. 417 Minn. 1926
In Re Judicial Ditch No. 9 208 N.W. 417 Minn. 1926
v. Nelson, 137 Minn. 265 , , ; State ex rel.
In re Judicial Ditch No. 10 194 N.W. 875 Minn. 1923
In re Judicial Ditch No. 10 194 N.W. 875 Minn. 1923
v. Nelson, 137 Minn. 265, 273 , , .
State ex rel. Movitz v. District Court 188 N.W. 1015 Minn. 1922
State ex rel. Movitz v. District Court 188 N.W. 1015 Minn. 1922
State v. Watts, 116 Minn. 326 , ; Rooney v. County of Stearns, 130 Minn. 176 , ; State v. Nelson, 137 Minn. 265 , , ; In re Judicial Ditch No. 12, Renville County, 147 Minn. 290 , 180 N. N. 119.