DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hawley v. Wallace, 163 N.W. 127.

39 citing documents.

  • David Levy, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    8 “cases at law” to mean “ordinary common-law actions as distinguished from equity or admiralty causes and special proceedings.”
  • Riley v. Jankowski 713 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • Riley v. Jankowski 713 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
    See Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183, 184-87 , 163 N.W.
  • Abraham v. County of Hennepin 639 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2002
  • Abraham v. County of Hennepin 639 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2002
    110, 112 (1923); Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183, 187 , 163 N.W.
  • Derus v. Higgins 555 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 1996
  • Derus v. Higgins 555 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 1996
    839, 842 (1940)); Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183, 185 , 163 N.W.
  • Kennedy v. Voss 304 N.W.2d 299 Minn. 1981
  • Kennedy v. Voss 304 N.W.2d 299 Minn. 1981
    See Bank v. Egan, 240 Minn. 192, 194 , Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183, 186 , 163 N.W.
  • Bundlie v. Christensen 276 N.W.2d 69 Minn. 1979
  • Bundlie v. Christensen 276 N.W.2d 69 Minn. 1979
    In Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183, 186 , 163 N.W.
  • State Ex Rel. Holton v. BOARD OF ED., ETC. 222 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1974
  • State Ex Rel. Holton v. BOARD OF ED., ETC. 222 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1974
    276, 277 (1914); Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183 , 163 N.W.
  • Grotjohn v. McCollar 191 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 1971
  • Grotjohn v. McCollar 191 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 1971
    * * * Acts of the candidate which are not serious or material but which are immaterial and trifling are not grounds for avoiding an election.” See, also, Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183
  • Barthel v. Zachman 185 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1971
  • Barthel v. Zachman 185 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1971
    se did not arise from any want of good faith, and under the circumstances it seems to the court to be unjust that the candidate shall forfeit his nomination, position or office, then the nomination or election of such candidate shall not by reason of such offense complained to be void, nor shall the candidate be removed from nor deprived of his nomination, position, or office.” Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183 , .
  • Bank v. Egan 60 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 1953
  • Bank v. Egan 60 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 1953
    Miller v. Maier, 136 Minn. 231 , , 2 A. L. R. 399; Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183 , .
  • Effertz v. Schimelpfenig 291 N.W. 286 Minn. 1940
  • Effertz v. Schimelpfenig 291 N.W. 286 Minn. 1940
    Likewise, in Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183, 184 , , it was held that “the publication of any false statement in relation to a candidate which is intended to affect voting at any election or tends to do so” is what the act prohibits.
  • Miske v. Fischer 259 N.W. 18 Minn. 1935
  • Distinguished Miske v. Fischer 259 N.W. 18 Minn. 1935
    This case is distinguishable from those relied upon and cited by appellant in his brief such as Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183 , ; Exrieder v. O’Keefe, 143 Minn. 278 , ; Flaten v. Kvale, 146 Minn. 463 , 179 * Miller v. Maier, 136 Minn. 231 , , 2 A. L. R.. 399.
  • In Re Disbarment of G. Halvorson 221 N.W. 907 Minn. 1928
  • In Re Disbarment of G. Halvorson 221 N.W. 907 Minn. 1928
    Hanson v. Village of Adrian, 126 Minn. 298 , ; Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183 , .
  • State Ex Rel. Olson v. Guilford 219 N.W. 770 Minn. 1928
  • State Ex Rel. Olson v. Guilford 219 N.W. 770 Minn. 1928
    Wilcox v. Ryder, 126 Minn. 95 , , 5 A. L. R. 1449; Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183 , .
  • Berg v. Penttila 217 N.W. 935 Minn. 1928
  • Berg v. Penttila 217 N.W. 935 Minn. 1928
    Simmons v. Holster, 13 Minn. 232 (249); Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183 , ; 4 Wigmore, Ev.
  • In Re Election Contest of Christian 213 N.W. 48 Minn. 1927
  • In Re Election Contest of Christian 213 N.W. 48 Minn. 1927
    Miller v. Maier, 136 Minn. 231 , , 2 A. L. R. 399; Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183 , .
  • Swanson v. Alworth 209 N.W. 907 Minn. 1926
  • Swanson v. Alworth 209 N.W. 907 Minn. 1926
    Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183 , , and cases cited.
  • Bassi v. Bassi 205 N.W. 947 Minn. 1925
  • Bassi v. Bassi 205 N.W. 947 Minn. 1925
    Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183 (187), .
  • State v. Mason 189 N.W. 452 Minn. 1922
  • State v. Mason 189 N.W. 452 Minn. 1922
    ence even against Mmself if he is not compelled to give it, and it does not prohibit his being compelled to give testimony against another, even though he may be charged with or suspected of the same crime; nor does it prohibit the state from calling before a grand jury one suspected of a crime under investigation, so long as he is not compelled to give evidence against Mmself, Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183 , , and there is notMng in the Constitution which prohibits the grand jury before whic
  • Flour City Fuel & Transfer Co. v. Young 185 N.W. 934 Minn. 1921
  • Flour City Fuel & Transfer Co. v. Young 185 N.W. 934 Minn. 1921
    Hawley v. Wallace, 137 Minn. 183 , , and cases cited; 2 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.