Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Olsson v. Midland Insurance, 165 N.W. 474.
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Wicka 474 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1991
-
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Wicka
474 N.W.2d 324
Minn. 1991
Co., 138 Minn. 424, 430 , 165 N.W.
- Danielson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 98 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 1959
-
Danielson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
98 N.W.2d 72
Minn. 1959
Co. 138 Minn. 424, 429 , .
- Floen v. Sund 96 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1959
-
Floen v. Sund
96 N.W.2d 563
Minn. 1959
Co. 138 Minn. 424, 427 , .
- Blazek v. North American Life & Casualty Co. 87 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1957
- Blazek v. North American Life & Casualty Co. 87 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1957
- Calich v. Consul of the Kingdom 8 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1943
-
Calich v. Consul of the Kingdom
8 N.W.2d 337
Minn. 1943
Co. 138 Minn. 424 , ; Osbon v. Hartfiel, 201 Minn. 347 , , one of the last of a long line of cases so holding.
- Schaedler v. New York Life Insurance 276 N.W. 235 Minn. 1937
- Osbon v. Hartfiel 276 N.W. 270 Minn. 1937
- Schaedler v. New York Life Insurance 276 N.W. 235 Minn. 1937
-
Osbon v. Hartfiel
276 N.W. 270
Minn. 1937
Co. 138 Minn. 424, 427-428
- Domico v. Metropolitan Life Insurance 253 N.W. 538 Minn. 1934
-
Domico v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
253 N.W. 538
Minn. 1934
Co. 138 Minn. 424 , ; Seiler v. Commer *219 cial Acc.
- Marcel v. Cudahy Packing Co. 243 N.W. 265 Minn. 1932
-
Marcel v. Cudahy Packing Co.
243 N.W. 265
Minn. 1932
Co. 138 Minn. 424 , ; Jensen v. Fischer, 134 Minn. 366 , ; Sina v. Carlson, 120 Minn. 283 , ; Burud v. G. N. Ry.
- Osborn v. Will 236 N.W. 197 Minn. 1931
- Osborn v. Will 236 N.W. 197 Minn. 1931
- O'Leary v. Wangensteen 221 N.W. 430 Minn. 1928
-
O'Leary v. Wangensteen
221 N.W. 430
Minn. 1928
Co. 138 Minn. 424 , ; Stephon v. Topic, 147 Minn. 263 , ; Deposit Tr.
- Iblings v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance 215 N.W. 429 Minn. 1927
-
Iblings v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance
215 N.W. 429
Minn. 1927
Co. 138 Minn. 424 , ; Johnson v. National Life Ins.
- Barnard v. Seaman 211 N.W. 473 Minn. 1926
- Barnard v. Seaman 211 N.W. 473 Minn. 1926
- Schmitt v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 210 N.W. 846 Minn. 1926
-
Schmitt v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
210 N.W. 846
Minn. 1926
Co. 138 Minn. 424 , ; Gruberski v. Brotherhood of A. Y. 149 Minn. 49 , .
- Turner v. Gackle 209 N.W. 626 Minn. 1926
- Turner v. Gackle 209 N.W. 626 Minn. 1926
- State Bank of Gibbon v. Walter 208 N.W. 423 Minn. 1926
- MacK v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance 208 N.W. 410 Minn. 1926
-
State Bank of Gibbon v. Walter
208 N.W. 423
Minn. 1926
Co. 138 Minn. 424 , ; Stephon v. Topic, 147 Minn. 263 , .
-
MacK v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance
208 N.W. 410
Minn. 1926
Co. 138 Minn. 424 , ; Ivanesovich v. N. A. Life & C. Co. 145 Minn. 175 , ; First Nat.
- Shaughnessy v. New York Life Insurance 203 N.W. 600 Minn. 1925
- Flikeid v. New York Life Insurance 203 N.W. 598 Minn. 1925
- Flikeid v. New York Life Insurance 203 N.W. 598 Minn. 1925
-
Shaughnessy v. New York Life Insurance
203 N.W. 600
Minn. 1925
Co. 138 Minn. 424 , , but does not require the disclosure of medical consultations or treatment for slight or temporary ailments.
- Aaberg v. Minneapolis Commercial Men's Assn. 201 N.W. 626 Minn. 1925
- Aaberg v. Minneapolis Commercial Men's Assn. 201 N.W. 626 Minn. 1925
- West v. First State Bank 197 N.W. 850 Minn. 1924
- West v. First State Bank 197 N.W. 850 Minn. 1924
- Babich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 195 N.W. 784 Minn. 1923
- Babich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 195 N.W. 784 Minn. 1923
- Kasal v. Picha 156 Minn. 446 Minn. 1923
-
Kasal v. Picha
156 Minn. 446
Minn. 1923
Co. 138 Minn. 424, 425 , .
- Nelson v. Bullard 194 N.W. 308 Minn. 1923
-
Nelson v. Bullard
194 N.W. 308
Minn. 1923
Co. 138 Minn. 424 , , a number of the cases are collated.
- Ames v. New York Life Insurance 191 N.W. 274 Minn. 1922
-
Ames v. New York Life Insurance
191 N.W. 274
Minn. 1922
Co. 138 Minn. 424 , , notwithstanding the uncontradicted testimony of a physician that he had treated the insured 50 or 60 times within the year preceding the application, it was held that the circumstances were such that it should not be declared as a matter of law that the insured had in fact received the treatments to