Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Brazil v. County of Sibley, 166 N.W. 1077.

63 citing documents.

Metropolitan Sewer Board v. Thiss 200 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 1972
Metropolitan Sewer Board v. Thiss 200 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 1972
2 Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458
Lerner v. City of Minneapolis 169 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1969
Lerner v. City of Minneapolis 169 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1969
Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458, 461 , ; Linster v. Luecke, 186 Minn. 386 , .
Lieser v. Town of St. Martin 96 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1959
Lieser v. Town of St. Martin 96 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1959
In Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , , the petition under the statute involved the plea for a change and alteration of an alleged existing public highway which was duly presented to the board of county commissioners.
Thorland v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 44 74 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1956
In Re Certain School Districts, Freeborn County 246 Minn. 96 Minn. 1956
In Re Certain School Districts, Freeborn County 246 Minn. 96 Minn. 1956
869, 1095 ; Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , 166 N.W.
Thorland v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 44 74 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1956
No. 47 v. Meeker County, 143 Minn. 169 , ; Hunstiger v. Kilian, 130 Minn. 474 , ; Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , ; Common School Dist.
Griswold v. County of Ramsey 65 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1954
Griswold v. County of Ramsey 65 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1954
6 See, Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , , and cases cited therein; Linster v. Luecke, 186 Minn. 386 , .
In Re Dissolution of Independent School District No. 27 60 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1953
In Re Dissolution of Independent School District No. 27 60 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1953
Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , ; In re Enlargement of Independent School Dist.
The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna 24 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1946
The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna 24 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1946
Illustrative of such cases are the following: Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , 461 , 166 N.W.
State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of Education 7 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1942
State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of Education 7 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1942
1913B, 785, supra; and see Hunstiger v. Kilian, supra; Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , ; Id.
State, Railroad & Warehouse Commission v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 297 N.W. 189 Minn. 1941
State, Railroad & Warehouse Commission v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 297 N.W. 189 Minn. 1941
See Bennett v. Beaty, 156 Minn. 293 , , and Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , .
Rasmussen v. County of Hennepin 289 N.W. 773 Minn. 1940
Rasmussen v. County of Hennepin 289 N.W. 773 Minn. 1940
§ 397b; Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , ; In re Appeal of Sartell, 149 Minn. 233 , ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Petterson v. Werder 273 N.W. 714 Minn. 1937
Village of Lamberton v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 265 N.W. 801 Minn. 1936
Village of Lamberton v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 265 N.W. 801 Minn. 1936
Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , ; Fohl v. Village of Sleepy Eye Lake, 80 Minn. 67 , ; St.
County of Becker v. Shevlin Land Co. 243 N.W. 433 Minn. 1932
County of Becker v. Shevlin Land Co. 243 N.W. 433 Minn. 1932
Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , ; Mt.
Linster v. Luecke 243 N.W. 395 Minn. 1932
Linster v. Luecke 243 N.W. 395 Minn. 1932
This is clearly and sufficiently demonstrated in Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , , and the cases therein referred to.
In Re Establishment of Judicial Road 222 N.W. 578 Minn. 1928
In re Establishment of Judicial Road 176 Minn. 94 Minn. 1928
In re Establishment of Judicial Road 176 Minn. 94 Minn. 1928
Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , ; Mahoney v. Kelley, 156 Minn. 327 , .
In Re Establishment of Judicial Road 222 N.W. 578 Minn. 1928
Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , 166 N.W.
Packard v. County of Otter Tail 219 N.W. 289 Minn. 1928
Packard v. County of Otter Tail 219 N.W. 289 Minn. 1928
No. 31, 134 Minn. 82 , ; Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , ; Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , ; Hall v. Commrs.
Trout Brook Realty Co. v. Town of Featherstone 217 N.W. 499 Minn. 1928
Trout Brook Realty Co. v. Town of Featherstone 217 N.W. 499 Minn. 1928
We.think appellant failed in this under the settled law in this state as expressed in Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , ; Rolf v. Town of Hancock, 167 Minn. 187 , , and cases therein cited.
State v. Trask 209 N.W. 18 Minn. 1926
State v. Trask 209 N.W. 18 Minn. 1926
This objection was held not well taken; but it was suggested that the review of the courts was of the limited character permitted in the review of administrative questions, as illustrated in Brazil v. Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , 166 N.W.
Rolf v. Town of Hancock 208 N.W. 757 Minn. 1926
Rolf v. Town of Hancock 208 N.W. 757 Minn. 1926
Schweigert v. Abbott, 122 Minn. 383 , ; Hunstiger v. Kilian, 130 Minn. 474 , ; Sorknes v. Board, 131 Minn. 79 , ; School District v. School District, 134 Minn. 82 , ; Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , ; Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , ; Froehling v. Ind.
Mahoney v. Kelley 194 N.W. 775 Minn. 1923
Bennett v. Beaty 194 N.W. 627 Minn. 1923
Mahoney v. Kelley 194 N.W. 775 Minn. 1923
See also School District No. 40 v. Bolstad, 121 Minn. 376 , ; State v. Flaherty, 140 Minn. 19 , ; Hunstiger v. Kilian, 130 Minn. 474 , ; Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , .
Bennett v. Beaty 194 N.W. 627 Minn. 1923
In order to reverse the action of a legislative or administrative body of this sort, where an appeal or review by a court is provided, the only question for the court is whether the body “acted arbitrarily and in disregard of the best interests of the public, or upon an erroneous theory of the law, or whether the evidence is practically conclusive against the order.” Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , ; Sartell v. County of Benton, 149 Minn. 233 , ; Diamond v. City of Mankato, 89 Minn.
Brazil v. County of Sibley 181 N.W. 329 Minn. 1921
Brazil v. County of Sibley 181 N.W. 329 Minn. 1921
Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , .
Paulson v. Board of County Commissioners 179 N.W. 217 Minn. 1920
Paulson v. Board of County Commissioners 179 N.W. 217 Minn. 1920
Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , Common School District No. 85 v. County of Renville, 141 Minn. 300 , .
State v. Koochiching Realty Co. 177 N.W. 940 Minn. 1920