Cited by

Citing another one of our ca ses—In re Wood, 167 N.W. 358 (Minn. 1918)—Bernhard claims that the only exception to this rule arises when post - decision evidence is so compelling that it would require a different outcome.

The matter rests largely in the discretion of the trial court.” Wood v. Wood, 140 Minn. 130, 132

of Granite Falls, 140 Minn. 133 , 167 N.W.

of Granite Falls, 140 Minn. 133 , ; Packard v. County of Otter Tail, 174 Minn. 347 , ; School Dist.

of Granite Falls, 140 Minn. 133 , ; In re Enlargement of Independent School Dist.

of Granite Falls, 140 Minn. 133 , ; In re Appeal of Consolidated School Dist.

See, In re Guardianship of Wood, 140 Minn. 130 , .

In the case of In re Guardianship of Wood, 140 Minn. 130, 132 , , after we bad afflrmed an order denying a motion for a new trial in Wood v. Wood, 137 Minn. 252 , , we held that “A new trial may be granted because of evidence of facts arising after the trial,” and we reversed upon that ground, even though the evidence was newly discovered not only after trial bu

In re Guardianship of Wood, 140 Minn. 130 , ; State v. Myers, 154 Minn. 242 , .

140 Minn. 133 , ; Common School Dist.

In re Guardianship of Wood, 140 Minn. 130 , ; Podgorski v. Kerwin, 147 Minn. 103 , .

of Chippewa County, 140 Minn. 133 , ; Common School Dist.

140 Minn. 71 , 167 N.. W. 108; Hall v. Board, 140 Minn. 133 , ; Common School District v. County of Renville, 141 Minn. 300 , ; Paulson v. Board, 147 Minn. 7 , ; Sartell v. County of Benton, 149 Minn. 233 , ; Severts v. County of Yellow Medicine, 148 Minn. 321 , .

of Chippewa County, 140 Minn. 133 , ; Common School Dist.

Co. 46 Minn. 269, 273 , ; State v. Brooks, 84 Minn. 276 , ; Hanson v. Bailey, 96 Minn. 275 , ; Wood v. Wood, 140 Minn. 130 , .

Wood v. Wood, 140 Minn. 130 , .

of Chippewa County, 140 Minn. 133 , ; Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , .

of Chippewa County, 140 Minn. 133 , , and in Kramer v. County of Renville, 141 Minn. 300 , , citing former decisions, that the county board, in determining the propriety of enlarging -a school district, exercises a discretion that is legislative, not judicial, and that, on appeal to the district court, the determination of

of Chippewa County, 140 Minn. 133 , ; Common School District v. County of Renville, 141 Minn. 300 , ; Independent School District v. Meeker County, 143 Minn. 169 , .

of Chippewa County, 140 Minn. 133 , ; and Common School District No. 85 v. Renville County, 141 Minn. 300 , .