Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Moilen, 167 N.W. 345.

32 citing documents.

Minn. 2020
The Eighth Amendment does not allow us to forbid the Legislature’s policy choice on such a matter when the national consensus and controlling precedent do not ev idence a clear departure from the fundamental law and a punishment that is “manifestly in excess of constitutional limitations.”
State of Minnesota v. Mahdi Hassan Ali 855 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 2014
State v. Rewitzer 617 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 2000
State v. Rewitzer 617 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 2000
1098, 1100 (1894); see also State v. Moilen, 140 Minn. 112, 115 , 167 N.W.
McLaughlin v. State 190 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 1971
McLaughlin v. State 190 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 1971
See, State v. Anderson, 280 Minn. 461 , (upholding a 1-year penalty for prostitution); State v. Moilen, 140 Minn. 112 , (upholding a 5-year penalty for criminal syndicalism) , 1 A second consideration for us is the propriety of overturning the trial judge’s decision.
Oksanen v. State 184 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1971
Oksanen v. State 184 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1971
State v. Moilen, 140 Minn. 112, 117 , .
State v. Dinneen 184 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1971
State v. Dinneen 184 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1971
The wisdom of such acts of the legislature is not for the courts, State v. Moilen, 140 Minn. 112 , , 1 A. L. R. 331; 5A Dunnell, Dig.
Steeves v. State 178 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1970
Steeves v. State 178 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1970
The wisdom of such acts of the legislature is not for the courts, State v. Moilen, 140 Minn. 112 , , 1 A. L. R. 331; 5A Dunnell, Dig.
State v. Edwards 177 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1970
State v. Edwards 177 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1970
Ct. No. 166-1/2, filed June 21, 1968; State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co., 99 Minn. 158 , ; State v. Moilen, 140 Minn. 112 , ; 5A Dunnell Dig.
State v. Anderson 159 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1968
State v. Anderson 159 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1968
The wisdom of such acts of the legislature is not for the courts, State v. Moilen, 140 Minn. 112 , , 1 A. L. R. 331; 5A Dunnell, Dig.
State v. Dietz 119 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1963
State v. Dietz 119 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1963
Minn. Const, art. Í, § 5, reads: “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor shall excessive fines be imposed; nor shall cruel or unusual punishments be inflicted.” In State v. Moilen, 140 Minn. 112, 115 , , 1 A. L. R. 331, 333, in discussing this constitutional provision, we said: “It is the exclusive province of the legislature to declare what acts, deemed by the lawmakers inimical to the public welfare, shall constitute a crime, to prohibit the same and impose appropriate penalties for a vio
State v. Meyer 37 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 1949
State v. Meyer 37 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 1949
In State v. Moilen, 140 Minn. 112, 115 , , 1 A. L. R. 331, we said: “It is the exclusive province of the legislature to declare what acts, deemed by the lawmakers inimical to the public welfare, shall constitute a crime, to prohibit the samé and impose appropriate penalties for a violation thereof.
State v. Hope 3 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 1942
State v. Hope 3 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 1942
State v. Moilen, 140 Minn. 112, 115, 117 , 347 , 1 A. L. R. 331; State v. Ives, 210 Minn. 141, 143 , .
State v. Ives 297 N.W. 563 Minn. 1941
State v. Ives 297 N.W. 563 Minn. 1941
Thus, in State v. Moilen, 140 Minn. 112, 115, 117 , , 1 A. L. R. 331, ive said that it was within the “exclusive province of the legislature to declare what acts, deemed by the lawmakers inimical to the public welfare, shall constitute a crime, to prohibit the same and impose appropriate penalties for a violation thereof.” The only judici
State v. Eich 282 N.W. 810 Minn. 1938
State v. Eich 282 N.W. 810 Minn. 1938
Upon the courts is imposed the duty of respecting the powers conferred upon that department of our government and to the law so enacted unless “there has been a clear departure from the fundamental law and the spirit and purpose thereof and a punishment imposed which is manifestly in excess of constitutional limitations.” State v. Moilen, 140 Minn. 112, 117 , , 1 A. L. R. 331.
State v. Colcord 212 N.W. 894 Minn. 1927
State v. Colcord 212 N.W. 894 Minn. 1927
634; State v. Harris, 134 Minn. 35 , ; State v. Moilen, 140 Minn. 112 , , 1 A. L. R. 331.
State v. Workers' Socialist Publishing Co. 185 N.W. 931 Minn. 1921
State v. Workers' Socialist Publishing Co. 185 N.W. 931 Minn. 1921
This statute was before the court in State v. Moilen, 140 Minn. 112 , , 1 A.L.R.
State v. Dombroski 176 N.W. 985 Minn. 1920
State v. Dombroski 176 N.W. 985 Minn. 1920
Ct. 663, 54 L. ed. 930; State v. Moilen, 140 Minn. 112 , , 1 L.R.A.