Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Carson v. Turrish, 168 N.W. 349.

31 citing documents.

Price v. Amdal 256 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1977
Price v. Amdal 256 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1977
817 (1924); Carson v. Turrish, 140 Minn. 445 , 168 N.W.
Schoeb v. Cowles 156 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1968
Schoeb v. Cowles 156 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1968
Carson v. Turrish, 140 Minn. 445 , , L. R. A. 1918F, 154, cited by plaintiff, is not inconsistent with the - above cases, for it holds only that an expert can give his opinion as to direction indicated by the marks.
Lambach v. Northwestern Refining Co. Inc. 111 N.W.2d 345 Minn. 1961
Carpenter v. Nelson 101 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1960
Carpenter v. Nelson 101 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1960
n v. March, 199 Minn. 376 , ; Wells v. Weed, 197 Minn. 464 , ; Romann v. Bender, 190 Minn. 419 , ; Baufield v. Warburton, 181 Minn. 506 , ; Gau v. J. Borgerding & Co. 175 Minn. 150 , ; Carter v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 170 Minn. 250 , ; Lowe v. Armour Packing Co. 148 Minn. 464 , ; Carson v. Turrish, 140 Minn. 445 , , L. R. A. 1918F, 154; Crozier v. Minneapolis St.
Carmody v. Aho 86 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1957
Penteluk v. Stark 69 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1955
Penteluk v. Stark 69 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1955
Co. 106 Minn. 77 , ; Carson v. Turrish, 140 Minn. 445 , , L. R. A. 1918F, 154; Gau v. J. Borgerding & Co. 175 Minn. 150 , ; Romann v. Bender, 190 Minn. 419 , .
Cameron v. Evans 62 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1954
Cameron v. Evans 62 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1954
Co. 106 Minn. 77 , ; Carson v. Turrish, 140 Minn. 445 , , L. R. A. 1918F, 154; Gau v. J. Borgerding & Co. 175 Minn. 150 , ; Romann v. Bender, 190 Minn. 419 , .
Beckman v. Schroeder 28 N.W.2d 629 Minn. 1947
Beckman v. Schroeder 28 N.W.2d 629 Minn. 1947
In Carson v. Turrish, 140 Minn. 445, 451 , , L. R. A. 1918F, 154, the court said: “A witness who had considerable familiarity with autos, their make, equipment, operation and driving, was at the scene of the collision the morning following.
Oxborough v. the Murphy Transfer Storage Co 260 N.W. 305 Minn. 1935
Oxborough v. the Murphy Transfer Storage Co 260 N.W. 305 Minn. 1935
Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , ; Carson v. Turrish, 140 Minn. 445 , , L. R. A. 1918F, 154.
Gross v. General Investment Co. 259 N.W. 557 Minn. 1935
Gross v. General Investment Co. 259 N.W. 557 Minn. 1935
There certainly is nothing in Carson v. Turrish, 140 Minn. 445 , , L. R. A. 1918F, 154; McMahon v. Flynn, 154 Minn. 326 , ; Hawkins v. Kronick C. & L. Co. 157 Minn. 33 , ; Aubin v. Duluth St.
Romann v. Bender 252 N.W. 80 Minn. 1934
Gau v. J. Borgerding & Co. 220 N.W. 412 Minn. 1928
Gau v. J. Borgerding & Co. 220 N.W. 412 Minn. 1928
Co. 94 Minn. 241 , ; L’Herault v. City of Minneapolis, 69 Minn. 261 , ; Carson v. Turrish, 140 Minn. 445 , , L. R. A. 1918F, 154; Lowe v. Armour Packing Co. 148 Minn. 464 , ; Carter v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 170 Minn. 250 , .
Manos v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 217 N.W. 377 Minn. 1928
Manos v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 217 N.W. 377 Minn. 1928
Co. 137 Minn. 275 , ; Carson v. Turrish, 140 Minn. 445 , ; Kalland v. City of Brainerd, 141 Minn. 119 , ; McKellar v. Yellow Cab Co. 148 Minn. 247 , ; Lundh v. G. N. Ry.
Aubin v. Duluth Street Railway Co. 211 N.W. 580 Minn. 1926
Aubin v. Duluth Street Railway Co. 211 N.W. 580 Minn. 1926
Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , ; Carson v. Turrish, 140 Minn. 445 , , L. R. A. 1918F, 154.
Bradley v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 201 N.W. 606 Minn. 1924
Bradley v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 201 N.W. 606 Minn. 1924
“It does not absolve one having the prior right from independent acts of negligence at such crossings.” Rosenau v. Peterson, 147 Minn. 95 , ; Carson v. Turrish, 140 Minn. 445 , , L. R. A. 1918F, 154; Gibbs v. Almstrom, 145 Minn. 35 , ; Anderson v. A. E. Jenny Motor Co. 150 Minn. 358 , .
Klare v. Peterson 200 N.W. 817 Minn. 1924
Klare v. Peterson 200 N.W. 817 Minn. 1924
Co. 119 Minn. 347 , ; Carson v. Turrish, 140 Minn. 445, 452 , , L. R. A. 1918F, 154.
Syck v. Duluth Street Railway Co. 177 N.W. 944 Minn. 1920
Syck v. Duluth Street Railway Co. 177 N.W. 944 Minn. 1920
Carson v. Turrish, 140 Minn. 445 , , L.R.A.