Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Bossung v. District Court of Hennepin County, 168 N.W. 589.

30 citing documents.

Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Bionics Corp. 630 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Bionics Corp. 630 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Bossung v. District Court, 140 Minn. 494, 498 , 168 N.W.
Rudebeck v. Paulson 612 N.W.2d 450 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Rudebeck v. Paulson 612 N.W.2d 450 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Bossung v. District Court, 140 Minn. 494, 498 , 168 N.W.
St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co. v. Mentor Corp. 503 N.W.2d 511 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co. v. Mentor Corp. 503 N.W.2d 511 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Bossung v. District Court, 140 Minn. 494, 498 , 168 N.W.
Fuhrman v. United America Insurors 269 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1978
Fuhrman v. United America Insurors 269 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1978
Bossung v. District Court, 140 Minn. 494 , 168 N.W.
Hentschel v. Smith 153 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1967
Hentschel v. Smith 153 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1967
This court, in affirming the denial of the motion, stated ( 140 Minn. 403 , ): “* * * The fact that the agreement was reported to the court and by it incorporated in the judgment, does not change the situation, nor the rights of the parties.
Bowen v. Willard 281 N.W. 256 Minn. 1938
Bowen v. Willard 281 N.W. 256 Minn. 1938
Bossung v. District Court, 140 Minn. 494 , , 1 A. L. R. 145, a different situation is presented.
Peterson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad 244 N.W. 823 Minn. 1932
Peterson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad 244 N.W. 823 Minn. 1932
Bossung v. District Court, 140 Minn. 494 , , 1 A. L. R. 145; U. P. R. Co. v. Rule, 155 Minn. 302 , ; Hoch v. Byram, 180 Minn. 298 , .
Hoch v. Byram 230 N.W. 823 Minn. 1930
Hoch v. Byram 230 N.W. 823 Minn. 1930
Bossung v. District Court, 140 Minn. 494 , , 1 A. L. R. 145; Union Pacific R. Co. v. Rule, 155 Minn. 302 , ; State ex rel.
Boright v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. 230 N.W. 457 Minn. 1930
Boright v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. 230 N.W. 457 Minn. 1930
Bossung v. District Court, 140 Minn. 494 , , 1 A. L. R. 145; Dennick v. Central R. Co. 103 U. S. 11 , 26 L. ed. 439; Robb v. Connolly, 111 U. S. 624 , 4 S. Ct. 544 , 28 L. ed. 542; Stewart v. B. & O. R. Co. 168 U. S. 445 , 18 S. Ct. *60 105, 42 L. ed. 537; and see cases cited in paragraph two.
St. Ex Rel. Collins v. Dist. Court for Ramsey County 222 N.W. 931 Minn. 1929
St. Ex Rel. Collins v. Dist. Court for Ramsey County 222 N.W. 931 Minn. 1929
Bossung v. District Court, 140 Minn. 494 , , 1 A. L. R. 145; Davis v. M. St.
Erving v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 214 N.W. 12 Minn. 1927
Erving v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 214 N.W. 12 Minn. 1927
Bossung v. District Court, 140 Minn. 494 , , 1 A. L. R. 145; Davis v. M. St.
Hovel v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 206 N.W. 710 Minn. 1926
Hovel v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 206 N.W. 710 Minn. 1926
State v. District Court, 140 Minn. 494 , , 7 A. L. R. 145; U. P. R. Co. v. Rule, 155 Minn. 302 , ; Frye v. C. R. I. & P. Ry.
Frye v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. 195 N.W. 629 Minn. 1923
Frye v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. 195 N.W. 629 Minn. 1923
Bossung v. District Court, 140 Minn. 494 , ,1 A. L. R. 145.
Union Pacific Railroad v. Rule 193 N.W. 161 Minn. 1923
Union Pacific Railroad v. Rule 193 N.W. 161 Minn. 1923
Bossung v. District Court, 140 Minn. 494 , , 1 A. L. R. 145, and cases there cited.
State ex rel. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Probate Court 184 N.W. 43 Minn. 1921
State ex rel. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Probate Court 184 N.W. 43 Minn. 1921
Bossung v. District Court of Hennepin County, 140 Minn. 494 , , 1 A. L. R. 145, where the action was brought by a foreign administrator.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by