Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Fest v. Olson, 163 N.W. 798.

26 citing documents.

Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 2008
Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 2008
t "[i]n order to estab *373 lish liability for an illegal sale * * *, the liquor sold need not be the sole cause of intoxication but it is enough if it is a co-operating, concurring, or proximately contributing cause.” Hahn v. City of Ortonville, 238 Minn. 428, 432 , -59 (1953); accord Trail v. Village of Elk River, 286 Minn. 380, 390 , Fest v. Olson, 138 Minn. 31, 33-34 , 163 N.W.
Englund v. MN CA Partners/MN Joint Ventures 555 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Englund v. MN CA Partners/MN Joint Ventures 555 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Rambaum, d at 22 (nonmembers or guests of club); (after-hours); Kvanli v. Village of Watson, 272 Minn. 481, 484 , (minors); Strand v. Village of Watson, 245 Minn. 414, 419-20 , d *331 609, 614 (1955) (intoxicated persons); Fest v. Olson, 138 Minn. 31, 33 , 163 N.W.
Rambaum v. Swisher 435 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1989
Rambaum v. Swisher 435 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1989
Fest v. Olson, 138 Minn. 31 , 163 N.W.
Rambaum v. Swisher 423 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Rambaum v. Swisher 423 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See, e.g., Murphy v. Hennen, 264 Minn. 457, 461-62 , (sales to minors); Strand v. Village of Watson, 245 Minn. 414, 422 , (sales to obviously intoxicated persons); Fest v. Olson, 138 Minn. 31, 33 , 163 N.W.
Hollerich v. City of Good Thunder 340 N.W.2d 665 Minn. 1983
Hollerich v. City of Good Thunder 340 N.W.2d 665 Minn. 1983
131 (1917); Fest v. Olson, 138 Minn. 31 , 163 N.W.
Ross v. Ross 200 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 1972
Ross v. Ross 200 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 1972
Benes v. Campion, 186 Minn. 578 , Fest v. Olson, 138 Minn. 31 , Annotation, 4 A. L. R. 3d 1332.
Dahl v. NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK MINNEAPOLIS 121 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1963
Dahl v. NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK MINNEAPOLIS 121 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1963
See, also, Lynch v. Brennan, 131 Minn. 136 , , L. R. A. 1916E, 269, and Fest v. Olson, 138 Minn. 31 , , for actions brought under statutes comparable to § 340.12, referring to the contractual liability thereunder.
Murphy v. Hennen 119 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1963
Murphy v. Hennen 119 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1963
2 Fest v. Olson, 138 Minn. 31 , ; Hartwig v. Loyal Order of Moose, 253 Minn. 347 , 91 N. W. (2d) 794 , 75 A. L. R. (2d) 459.
Hartwig v. Loyal Order of Moose, Brainerd Lodge No. 1246 91 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1958
Hartwig v. Loyal Order of Moose, Brainerd Lodge No. 1246 91 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1958
the act’s application in Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28 , 70 N. W. (2d) 886 , 52 A. L. R. (2d) 875; Hahn v. City of Ortonville, 238 Minn. 428 , 57 N. W. (2d) 254 ; Fox v. Swartz, 228 Minn. 233 , 36 N. W. (2d) 708 ; Philips v. Aretz, 215 Minn. 325 , 10 N. W. (2d) 226 ; Mayes v. Byers, 214 Minn. 54 , 7 N. W. (2d) 403 , 144 A. L. R. 821; Sworski v. Colman, 204 Minn. 474 , ; Fest v. Olson, 138 Minn. 31 , .
Hahn v. City of Ortonville 57 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1953
Hahn v. City of Ortonville 57 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1953
5 Fest v. Olson, 138 Minn. 31 , ; see, Sworski v. Coleman, 208 Minn. 43 , .
Sworski v. Coleman 293 N.W. 297 Minn. 1940
Sworski v. Coleman 293 N.W. 297 Minn. 1940
In Fest v. Olson, 138 Minn. 31, 33 , , where there was no expert testimony, we held that the question of causal connection was for the jury where the evidence showed that the deceased drowned by his boat capsizing while he was attempting to row across a lake in an intoxicated condition.
Pete v. Lampi 203 N.W. 447 Minn. 1925
Pete v. Lampi 203 N.W. 447 Minn. 1925
Miles v. National Surety Co. 149 Minn. 187 , ; Fest v. Olson, 138 Minn. 31 , ; Posch v. Lion B. & S. Co. 137 Minn. 169 , ; Wardell v. McConnell, 23 Neb.
Miles v. National Surety Co. 182 N.W. 996 Minn. 1921
Miles v. National Surety Co. 182 N.W. 996 Minn. 1921
Fest v. Olson, 138 Minn. 31 , .