Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hughes v. Farnsworth, 163 N.W. 525.

26 citing documents.

James M. Carlson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The supreme court’s analysis in a similar case, Hughes v. Farnsworth (In re Marshall Ave.), guides us.
Buettner v. City of St. Cloud 277 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1979
Buettner v. City of St. Cloud 277 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1979
The differing treatment properly afforded when the general reasonableness of a special assessment is challenged, as opposed to when its constitutionality is challenged, is illustrated by a comparison of Hughes v. Farnsworth, 137 Minn. 295 , 163 N.W.
Qvale v. City of Willmar 25 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1946
Qvale v. City of Willmar 25 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1946
v. Bremner, 190 Minn. 534 , , ; In re Improvement of Third Street, 185 Minn. 170 , ; In re Assessment for Widening East Fourth Street, 173 Minn. 67 , ; In re Improvement of Lake of the Isles Park, 152 Minn. 29, 36 , ; Hughes v. Farnsworth, 137 Minn. 295 , 163 N. W. *55 525; In re Assessment for Paving Concord Street, 148 Minn. 329 , ; City of Duluth v. Davidson, 97 Minn. 378 , ; State ex rel.
Board of Park Commissioners v. Bremner 252 N.W. 451 Minn. 1934
Board of Park Commissioners v. Bremner 190 Minn. 634 Minn. 1934
Board of Park Commissioners v. Bremner 190 Minn. 634 Minn. 1934
Hughes v. Farnsworth, 137 Minn. 295 , 163 * .
In Re Improvement of Third Street, St. Paul 240 N.W. 355 Minn. 1932
In Re Improvement of Third Street, St. Paul 240 N.W. 355 Minn. 1932
Hughes v. Farnsworth, 137 Minn. 295 , ; In re Concord Street, 118 Minn. 329 , .
In Re Assessment for Widening East Fourth Street in St. Paul 216 N.W. 907 Minn. 1927
In Re Assessment for Widening East Fourth Street in St. Paul 216 N.W. 907 Minn. 1927
Hughes v. Farnsworth, 137 Minn. 295 , ; Sullwold v. City of St.
In Re Assessment for Improving Superior Street 216 N.W. 318 Minn. 1927
In Re Assessment for Improving Superior Street 216 N.W. 318 Minn. 1927
* * * If the question of what property is benefited is a matter upon which reasonable men may differ, then there is no ground for the application of the rule that the board proceeded upon an illegal principle or an erroneous rule of law.” Hughes v. Farnsworth, 137 Minn. 295 , .
In Re Assessment for Paving Mississippi River Boulevard 211 N.W. 9 Minn. 1926
In Re Assessment for Paving Mississippi River Boulevard 211 N.W. 9 Minn. 1926
Hughes v. Farnsworth, 137 Minn. 295 , , is not in conflict.
In Re Assessment of Benefits From Changing Grade, Paving & Improving Robert & Other Streets 204 N.W. 558 Minn. 1925
In Re Assessment of Benefits From Changing Grade, Paving & Improving Robert & Other Streets 204 N.W. 558 Minn. 1925
Hughes v. Farnsworth, 137 Minn. 295 , .
In re Improvement of Lake of the Isles Park 188 N.W. 54 Minn. 1922
In re Improvement of Lake of the Isles Park 188 N.W. 54 Minn. 1922
State v. Board of Public Works, 27 Minn. 442 , ; State v. District Court Of Ramsey County, 33 Minn. 164 , ; Mayer v. City of Shakopee, 114 Minn. 80 , ; Hughes v. Farnsworth, 137 Minn. 295 , ; Sullwold v. City of St.
In re the Assessment of Benefits, Costs & Expenses 181 N.W. 859 Minn. 1921
In re the Assessment of Benefits, Costs & Expenses 181 N.W. 859 Minn. 1921
Construing the charter we held in Hughes v. Farnsworth, 137 Minn. 295 , , that, while assessments must be in proportion to benefits, the apportionment is a legislative function, and that the determination of the assessing body is not conclusive upon the courts if the assessment is made upon a demonstrable mistake of fact or upon an er *331 roneous or illegal principle of l
City of Duluth v. Duluth Street Railway Co. 176 N.W. 47 Minn. 1920
City of Duluth v. Duluth Street Railway Co. 176 N.W. 47 Minn. 1920
City of Duluth v. Davidson, 97 Minn. 378 , ; Hughes v. Farnsworth, 137 Minn. 295 , .
Sullwold v. City of St. Paul 164 N.W. 983 Minn. 1917
Sullwold v. City of St. Paul 164 N.W. 983 Minn. 1917
Hughes v. Farnsworth, 137 Minn. 295 , .