Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co., 163 N.W. 665.
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Czarnik 759 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 2009
-
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Czarnik
759 N.W.2d 217
Minn. 2009
892, 893 (1927) (citing *223 Helvetia Copper Co. v. Harb-Parr Co., 137 Minn. 321, 324 , 163 N.W.
- Swedeen v. Swedeen 134 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1965
-
Swedeen v. Swedeen
134 N.W.2d 871
Minn. 1965
(3 ed.) § 3818; Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 137 Minn. 321 , ; Dwinnell v. Oftedahl, 235 Minn. 383 , 51 N. W. (2d) 93 .
- Truesdale v. Friedman 132 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1965
- Swanson v. Domning 86 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 1957
-
Swanson v. Domning
86 N.W.2d 716
Minn. 1957
1 See, also, Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 137 Minn. 321 , ; Osborn v. Will, 183 Minn. 205 , ; Moulton v. Norton, 184 Minn. 343 , ; Gaetke v. The Ebarr Co. Inc. 195 Minn. 393 , ; Spiess v. Brandt, 230 Minn. 246 , 41 N. W. (2d) 561 , 27 A. L. R. (2d) 1; Dwinnell v. Oftedahl, 235 Minn. 383 , 51 N. W. (2d) 93 ; Restatemen
- McMillen v. Meyer 74 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1956
- National Equipment Corp. v. Volden 252 N.W. 444 Minn. 1934
-
National Equipment Corp. v. Volden
252 N.W. 444
Minn. 1934
In Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 137 Minn. 321 , 163 N.W.
- Moulton v. Norton 238 N.W. 686 Minn. 1931
-
Moulton v. Norton
238 N.W. 686
Minn. 1931
Shane v. Jacobson, 136 Minn. 386 , ; Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 137 Minn. 321 , ; Tischer v. Bardin, 155 Minn. 361 , ; Osborn v. Will, 183 Minn. 205 , .
- Osborn v. Will 236 N.W. 197 Minn. 1931
-
Osborn v. Will
236 N.W. 197
Minn. 1931
1918A, 355; Schlechter v. Felton, 134 Minn. 143 , , L. R. A. 1917A, 556; Shane v. Jacobson, 136 Minn. 386 , ; Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 137 Minn. 321 , ; Perkins v. Orfield, 145 Minn. 68 , ; Ristvedt v. Watters, 146 Minn. 146 , ; Tischer v. Bardin, 155 Minn. 361 , ; Saupe v. St.
- Bryant v. Rand 227 N.W. 214 Minn. 1929
-
Bryant v. Rand
227 N.W. 214
Minn. 1929
Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 137 Minn. 321 , .
- Mix v. Downing 222 N.W. 913 Minn. 1929
- Mix v. Downing 222 N.W. 913 Minn. 1929
-
Mix v. Downing
222 N.W. 913
Minn. 1929
Co. 136 Minn. 96 , *160 , 2 A. L. R. 530; Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 137 Minn. 321 , ; Smith v. G. N. Ry.
-
Mix v. Downing
222 N.W. 913
Minn. 1929
530 ; Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 137 Minn. 321 , 163 N.W.
- Becker v. Messner 221 N.W. 724 Minn. 1928
-
Becker v. Messner
221 N.W. 724
Minn. 1928
1918A, 355; Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 137 Minn. 321 , .
- Call v. Terminal Supply Co. 213 N.W. 917 Minn. 1927
-
Call v. Terminal Supply Co.
213 N.W. 917
Minn. 1927
1918A, 355; Schlechter v. Felton, 134 Minn. 143 , , L. R. A. 1917A, 556; Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 137 Minn. 321 , .
- Saupe v. St. Paul Trust Co. 212 N.W. 892 Minn. 1927
-
Saupe v. St. Paul Trust Co.
212 N.W. 892
Minn. 1927
See also Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 137 Minn. 321, 324 , .
- Tischer v. Bardin 194 N.W. 3 Minn. 1923
-
Tischer v. Bardin
194 N.W. 3
Minn. 1923
485; Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 137 Minn. 321 , .
- First National Bank v. Blocker 185 N.W. 292 Minn. 1921
-
First National Bank v. Blocker
185 N.W. 292
Minn. 1921
1917A, 556 ; Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 137 Minn. 321 , ; Jacobson v. Chicago, M. & St.
- Schmitt v. Ornes Esswein & Co. 183 N.W. 840 Minn. 1921
-
Schmitt v. Ornes Esswein & Co.
183 N.W. 840
Minn. 1921
The representation defendant is alleged to have made is not materially different from those involved in Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 137 Minn. 321 , ; General Elec.
- Ristvedt v. Watters 178 N.W. 166 Minn. 1920
-
Ristvedt v. Watters
178 N.W. 166
Minn. 1920
1917F, 556 ; Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 137 Minn. 321 , .
- Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 171 N.W. 272 Minn. 1919
-
Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co.
171 N.W. 272
Minn. 1919
On a former appeal, 137 Minn. 321, this court held on the evidence then before it that the question whether plaintiff was entitled to relief from the settlement of April 26, 1910, on the ground of misrepresentation, was a question of fact for submission tó a jury.