Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Petcoff v. Reed, 163 N.W. 984.

38 citing documents.

State Ex Rel. Atkinson v. Tahash 142 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 1966
State Ex Rel. Atkinson v. Tahash 142 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 1966
Petcoff v. Reed, 138 Minn. 465, 467 , , where we said: “The rulings are to the effect that an indeterminate sentence, imposed under a law authorizing such sentences, is a sentence for the maximum term prescribed for the offense committed, coupled with a provision which permits but does not require an earlier release; that, as an
State Ex Rel. Holm v. Tahash 139 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 1965
State Ex Rel. Holm v. Tahash 139 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 1965
Petcoff v. Reed, 138 Minn. 465, 466 , : “* * * [T]he prisoner is not entitled to a discharge on habeas corpus until he has fully performed so much of the sentence as the court had power to impose.” The overall limitations on the scope of the remedy afforded by habeas corpus, often repeated in our decisions, is well summarized in Willo
State Ex Rel. O'Neill v. Tahash 122 N.W.2d 165 Minn. 1963
State Ex Rel. O'Neill v. Tahash 122 N.W.2d 165 Minn. 1963
Petcoff v. Reed, 138 Minn. 465 , ; State ex rel.
State ex rel. Hoffman v. Tahash 116 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1962
State ex rel. Hoffman v. Tahash 116 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1962
Petcoff v. Reed, 138 Minn. 465, 467 , 163 * , we adopted the rale that ‘an indeterminate sentence, imposed under a law authorizing such sentences, is a sentence for the maximum term prescribed for the offense committed, coupled with a provision which permits but does not require an earlier release; that, as an earlier release cann
State Ex Rel. Alm v. Tahash 111 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1961
State Ex Rel. Alm v. Tahash 111 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1961
Petcoff v. Reed, 138 Minn. 465 , ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. O'Neill v. Rigg 98 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 1959
State Ex Rel. Flynn v. Rigg 98 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1959
State Ex Rel. O'Neill v. Rigg 98 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 1959
Petcoff v. Reed, 138 Minn. 465 , ; Breeding v. Swenson, 240 Minn. 93 , 60 N. W. (2d) 4 .
State Ex Rel. Flynn v. Rigg 98 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1959
Petcoff v. Reed, 138 Minn. 465 , .
State Ex Rel. Soward v. Rigg 97 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1959
State Ex Rel. Soward v. Rigg 97 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1959
Petcoff v. Reed, 138 Minn. 465 , .
State Ex Rel. Adams v. Rigg 89 N.W.2d 898 Minn. 1958
State Ex Rel. Adams v. Rigg 89 N.W.2d 898 Minn. 1958
Petcoff v. Reed, 138 Minn. 465 , ; Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82 , 43 N. W. (2d) 781 .
State v. Pederson 88 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1958
State v. Pederson 88 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1958
Petcoff v. Reed, 138 Minn. 465 , ; State v. Mamer, 139 Minn. 265 , ; Mims v. State, 26 Minn. 494 , ; State v. Framness, 43 Minn. 490 , ; 5 Dunnell, Dig.
State Ex Rel. Richter v. Swenson 63 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1954
State Ex Rel. Richter v. Swenson 63 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1954
Petcoff v. Reed, 138 Minn. 465 , ; Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82 , 43 N. W. (2d) 781 .
State ex rel. Hansen v. Utecht 40 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 1950
State ex rel. Hansen v. Utecht 40 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 1950
Petcoff vs. Reed, 138 Minn. 465 [ ], *580 “The sentence if erroneous is subject to correction.
State Ex Rel. Shetsky v. Utecht 36 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1949
State Ex Rel. Shetsky v. Utecht 36 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1949
Petcoff v. Reed, 188 Minn. 465, 467 , , where this court said: “If the sentence is valid in part and void in part and the two are not severable, or if it is wholly void because not such as the court was authorized to impose, the prisoner will be remanded for the imposition of a lawful sentence.
Willoughby v. Utecht 27 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 1947
Willoughby v. Utecht 27 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 1947
Petcoff v. Reed, 138 Minn. 465 , .
State v. Kaufman 214 N.W. 785 Minn. 1927
State v. Kaufman 214 N.W. 785 Minn. 1927
Petcoff v. Reed, 138 Minn. 465 , , the point not being available on appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
State Ex Rel. Plaster v. Maher 204 N.W. 955 Minn. 1925
State Ex Rel. Plaster v. Maher 204 N.W. 955 Minn. 1925
State v. Reed, 138 Minn. 465 , , and cases cited; State v. Langum, 125 Minn. 304 , , and cases cited.
State v. Mamer 166 N.W. 345 Minn. 1918
State v. Radke 166 N.W. 346 Minn. 1918
State v. Mamer 166 N.W. 345 Minn. 1918
State v. Reed, 138 Minn. 465 , .
State v. Radke 166 N.W. 346 Minn. 1918
State v. Reed, 138 Minn. 465 , ; State v. Mamer, supra, p. 265, .
State ex rel. Henderson v. Reed 163 N.W. 985 Minn. 1917
State ex rel. Henderson v. Reed 163 N.W. 985 Minn. 1917
This case is in all respects similar to that of State v. Reed, supra, page 468, .