Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Snider v. Peters Home Building Co., 167 N.W. 108.
-
All Around Property Preservation, LLC v. Ronald Clark, Bank of America, N.A., ...
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
states the 9 principle that “[i]t is the law of this state that the builder who has in good faith substantially performed, though there are minor defects, if they are of a character which may be so remedied that the owner will have that for which he contracted, may recover on the contract the agreed price less such sum as will cure the defects.”
- Paving Plus, Inc. v. Professional Investment, Inc. 382 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Paving Plus, Inc. v. Professional Investment, Inc.
382 N.W.2d 912
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
at 390 , d at 318 ; see Snider v. Peters Home Building Co., 139 Minn. 413, 415 , 167 N.W.
- HP Droher & Sons v. Toushin 85 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1957
-
HP Droher & Sons v. Toushin
85 N.W.2d 273
Minn. 1957
Co. 139 Minn. 413, 415 , , we said: “It is the law of this state that the builder who has in good faith substantially performed, though there are minor defects, if they are of a character which may be so remedied that the owner will have that for which he contracted, may recover on the contract the agreed price less
- Sward v. Nash 40 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1950
-
Sward v. Nash
40 N.W.2d 828
Minn. 1950
Co. 139 Minn. 413 , ; McClure v. Village of Browns Valley, *103 143 Minn. 339 , , 5 A. L. R. 1168; Independent School Dist.
- Knutson v. Lasher 18 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1945
-
Knutson v. Lasher
18 N.W.2d 688
Minn. 1945
Co. 139 Minn. 413 , ; Leeds v. Little, 42 Minn. 414 , .
- Independent School District No. 35 v. A. Hedenberg & Co. 7 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 1943
-
Independent School District No. 35 v. A. Hedenberg & Co.
7 N.W.2d 511
Minn. 1943
Co. 139 Minn. 413 , ; Brown v. Hall, 121 Minn. 61 , ; Elliott v. Caldwell, 43 Minn. 357 , , 9 L. R. A. 52.
- Service & Security, Inc. v. St. Paul Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 300 N.W. 811 Minn. 1941
- Service & Security, Inc. v. St. Paul Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 300 N.W. 811 Minn. 1941
- Groves v. John Wunder Co. 286 N.W. 235 Minn. 1939
-
Groves v. John Wunder Co.
286 N.W. 235
Minn. 1939
Co. 139 Minn. 413 , 414 , 416 , 167 N.W.
-
In Re Appeal of Consolidated School District No. 16
229 N.W. 585
Minn. 1930
No. 20, 140 Minn. 71 , ; Hall v. Board of Co. Commrs.
- Sampson v. Brince 177 N.W. 933 Minn. 1920
-
Sampson v. Brince
177 N.W. 933
Minn. 1920
Leeds v. Little, 42 Minn. 414 , ; Snider v. Peters Home Building Co. 139 Minn. 413 , , and cases cited.
- Middelstadt v. Kostendick 175 N.W. 553 Minn. 1919
-
Middelstadt v. Kostendick
175 N.W. 553
Minn. 1919
The doctrine of substantial performance of a contract as stated in such cases as Leeds v. Little, 42 Minn. 414 , , and Snider v. Peters H. B. Co. 139 Minn. 413 , , was, without doubt, properly applied here.
- McClure v. Village of Browns Valley 173 N.W. 672 Minn. 1919
- McClure v. Village of Browns Valley 173 N.W. 672 Minn. 1919
-
Hall v. Board of County Commissioners
167 N.W. 358
Minn. 1918
James, supra, page 71, ; Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , ; School District No. 36 v. School District No. 31, 134 Minn. 82 , ; Sorknes v. Board of Co. Commrs.