Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. District Court of Hennepin County, 166 N.W. 185.

53 citing documents.

Hutchins v. Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc. 331 N.W.2d 761 Minn. 1983
Hutchins v. Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc. 331 N.W.2d 761 Minn. 1983
Chambers v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205 , 166 N.W.
Follese v. Eastern Airlines 271 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1978
Follese v. Eastern Airlines 271 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1978
Chambers v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205 , 166 N.W.
City of St. Paul v. Sorenson 167 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1969
City of St. Paul v. Sorenson 167 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1969
Chambers v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205, 207 , , 3 A. L. R. 1347; and the fact that it had to carry compensation insurance in order to fulfill that obligation was incident to the contract obligation to its employe.” The oblique light which the Northern States Contracting case casts on our present problem comes from the circumstance that we rec
Houle v. Stearns-Rogers Manufacturing Co. 157 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1968
Houle v. Stearns-Rogers Manufacturing Co. 157 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1968
Chambers v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205 , , 3 A. L. R. 1347; Hubbard v. Midland Constructors, Inc. 269 Minn. 425 , 131 N. W. (2d) 209 ; Rice v. Keystone View Co. 210 Minn. 227 , ; Aleckson v. Kennedy Motor Sales Co. 238 Minn. 110 , 55 N. W. (2d) 696 ; Fitzgerald v. Economic Laboratory, Inc. 216 Minn. 296 , 12 N. W. (2d) 621 ; Mar
Hubbard v. Midland Constructors, Inc. 131 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1964
Hubbard v. Midland Constructors, Inc. 131 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1964
Chambers v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205, 209 , , 3 A. L. R. 1347, 4 where we said: “A basic thought underlying the compensation act is that the business or industry shall in the first instance pay for accidental injuries as a business expense or a part of the cost of production.
Fogarty v. Martin Hotel Co. 101 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1960
Fogarty v. Martin Hotel Co. 101 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1960
Chambers v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205, 207 , , 3 A. L. R. 1347, 1349, we said: “* * * It is unimportant whether the cause of the accident is referable to a tortious or a blameless act, or whether if tortious the employer or some third person is blameworthy, or even that the employee is at fault if not wilfully so.
Marrier v. National Painting Corp. 82 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1957
Marrier v. National Painting Corp. 82 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1957
Chambers v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205 , , 3 A. L. R. 1347; Krekelberg v. M. A. Floyd Co. 166 Minn. 149 , ; Bradtmiller v. Liquid Carbonic Co. 173 Minn. 481 , ; Brameld v. Albert Dickinson Co. 186 Minn. 89 , .
Aleckson v. Kennedy Motor Sales Co. 55 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1952
Aleckson v. Kennedy Motor Sales Co. 55 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1952
Chambers v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205, 209 , , 3 A. L. R. 1347, wherein the localization theory was first set forth and applied, we said: “* * * When a business is localized in a state there is nothing inconsistent with the principle of the compensation act in requiring the employer to compensate for injuries in a service incident to it
Derosier v. Jay W. Craig Co. 14 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1944
Fitzgerald v. Economic Laboratory, Inc. 12 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1943
Fitzgerald v. Economic Laboratory, Inc. 12 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1943
Chambers v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205 , , 3 A. L. R. 1347, this court has held that where a business is localized in this state it is the purpose of the statute to compensate for injuries in a service incidental to its conduct, though sustained beyond the borders of the state.
Rice v. Keystone View Co. 297 N.W. 841 Minn. 1941
Rice v. Keystone View Co. 297 N.W. 841 Minn. 1941
Chambers v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205 , , 3 A. L. R. 1347; State ex rel.
McGough v. McCarthy Improvement Co. 287 N.W. 857 Minn. 1939
McGough v. McCarthy Improvement Co. 287 N.W. 857 Minn. 1939
Chambers v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205 , 207 , 166 N.W.
Howlett v. Midwest Distributors, Inc. 277 N.W. 913 Minn. 1938
Howlett v. Midwest Distributors, Inc. 277 N.W. 913 Minn. 1938
Chambers v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205 , , 3 A. L. R. 1347; State ex rel.
Northern States Contracting Co. v. Oakes 253 N.W. 371 Minn. 1934
Northern States Contracting Co. v. Oakes 253 N.W. 371 Minn. 1934
Chambers v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205, 207 , 166 * A. L. R. 1347; and the fact that it had to carry compensation insurance in order to fulfill that obligation was incident to the contract obligation to its employe.
Brown v. City of Pipestone 245 N.W. 145 Minn. 1932
Brown v. City of Pipestone 245 N.W. 145 Minn. 1932
Chambers v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205 , 166 N.W.
Brameld v. Albert Dickinson Co. 242 N.W. 465 Minn. 1932
Brameld v. Albert Dickinson Co. 242 N.W. 465 Minn. 1932
Chambers v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205 , , 3 A. L. R. 1347; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Wharton v. Babcock 232 N.W. 718 Minn. 1930
State Ex Rel. Wharton v. Babcock 232 N.W. 718 Minn. 1930
Chambers v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205 , , 3 A. L. R. 1347.
Aase v. Langston 220 N.W. 421 Minn. 1928
Aase v. Langston 220 N.W. 421 Minn. 1928
Chambers v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205 , , 3 A. L. R. 1347; 6 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
Bradtmiller v. Liquid Carbonic Co. 217 N.W. 680 Minn. 1928
Bradtmiller v. Liquid Carbonic Co. 217 N.W. 680 Minn. 1928
Chambers v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205 , , 3 A. L. R. 1347; Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co. 150 Minn. 1 , , 20 A. L. R. 316; State ex rel.
Ginsburg v. Byers 214 N.W. 55 Minn. 1927
Ginsburg v. Byers 214 N.W. 55 Minn. 1927
Chambers v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205 , , 3 A. L. R. 1347.
Angell v. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co. 210 N.W. 1004 Minn. 1926
Angell v. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co. 210 N.W. 1004 Minn. 1926
State v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205 , , 3 A. L. R. 1347; State v. District Court, 141 Minn. 61 , ; Stansberry v. Monitor S. Co. 150 Minn. 1 , , 20 A. L. R. 316.
Krekelberg v. M. A. Floyd Co. 207 N.W. 193 Minn. 1926
Krekelberg v. M. A. Floyd Co. 207 N.W. 193 Minn. 1926
Chambers v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205 , , 3 A. L. R. 1347; State ex rel.
Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co. 183 N.W. 977 Minn. 1921
Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co. 183 N.W. 977 Minn. 1921
Chambers v. District Court of Hennepin County, 139 Minn. 305 , , 3 A. R. L. 1347; (distinguishing Johnson v. Nelson, 128 Minn. 158 , ); State ex rel.
State ex rel. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America v. District Court 170 N.W. 218 Minn. 1919
State ex rel. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America v. District Court 170 N.W. 218 Minn. 1919
One phase of the case was considered in State v. District Court of Hennepin County, 139 Minn. 205 , .
State ex rel. McCarthy Bros. v. District Court 169 N.W. 274 Minn. 1918
State ex rel. McCarthy Bros. v. District Court 169 N.W. 274 Minn. 1918
The case comes within the rules announced in State v. District Court of Hennepin County, 139 Minn. 205 , .
State ex rel. Maryland Casualty Co. v. District Court of Rice County 168 N.W. 177 Minn. 1918