Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co., 167 N.W. 800.

42 citing documents.

Diebold, Inc. v. Roadway Express, Inc. 538 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Diebold, Inc. v. Roadway Express, Inc. 538 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Co., 140 Minn. 229, 233 , 167 N.W.
Logefeil v. Logefeil 367 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Logefeil v. Logefeil 367 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Fidelity and Casualty Co. v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co., 140 Minn. 229 , 167 N.W.
Jack Frost, Inc. v. Engineered Building Components Co. 304 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1981
Jack Frost, Inc. v. Engineered Building Components Co. 304 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1981
The rule in Minnesota regarding the award of attorneys fees in an indemnity action was first stated in Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co., 140 Minn. 229, 233 , 167 N.W.
Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc. 255 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1977
Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc. 255 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1977
Co., 140 Minn. 229 , 167 N.W.
Sorenson v. Safety Flate, Inc. 235 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 1975
Sorenson v. Safety Flate, Inc. 235 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 1975
Co. 140 Minn. 229, 233 , where the Minnesota court recited the holding of Inhabitants of Westfield v. Mayo, 122 Mass. 100 , 23 Am.
Hillman v. Ellingson 215 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1974
Hillman v. Ellingson 215 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1974
Co. 140 Minn. 229, 231 , Larson v. City of Minneapolis, 262 Minn. 142, 148
Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Company 179 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 1970
Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Company 179 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 1970
Co. 140 Minn. 229 , ; Inhabitants of Westfield v. Mayo 122 Mass. 100 , 23 Am.
Jack v. Applebaum's Food Markets, Inc. 158 N.W.2d 857 Minn. 1968
Jack v. Applebaum's Food Markets, Inc. 158 N.W.2d 857 Minn. 1968
Co. 140 Minn. 229 , ; Prosser, Torts (3 ed.) § 48.'In spite of this rule, we are persuaded that under the facts of the present case Applebaum’s is not entitled to recover indemnity as a matter of law.
O'CONNELL v. Jackson 140 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 1966
O'CONNELL v. Jackson 140 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 1966
Co.] 140 Minn. 229 , as follows: “ ‘If a party is obliged to defend against the act of another, against whom he has a remedy over and defends solely and exclusively the act of such other party, and is compelled to defend no misfeasance of his own, he may notify such party of the pendency of the suit and may call upon him to defend it; i
White v. Johnson 137 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 1965
White v. Johnson 137 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 1965
Co. 140 Minn. 229 , ; Waylander-Peterson Co. v. G. N. Ry.
Thill v. Modern Erecting Company 136 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1965
Thill v. Modern Erecting Company 136 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1965
Co. 140 Minn. 229 , ; Minneapolis Mill Co. v. Wheeler, 31 Minn. 121 , *228 ; see, Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. 258 Minn. 368 , 104 N. W. (2d) 843 .
Brasch v. Wesolowsky 138 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 1965
Brasch v. Wesolowsky 138 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 1965
Co. 140 Minn. 229 , ; Minneapolis Mill Co. v. Wheeler, 31 Minn. 121 , .
Daly v. Bergstedt 126 N.W.2d 242 Minn. 1964
Daly v. Bergstedt 126 N.W.2d 242 Minn. 1964
Co. 140 Minn. 229, 231 , , is particularly appropriate here.
Larson v. City of Minneapolis 114 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1962
Larson v. City of Minneapolis 114 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1962
Co. 140 Minn. 229, 231 , , we expressed the rule as follows: “Generally, one of two joint tort-feasors cannot have contribution from the other.
DeVries v. City of Austin 110 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1961
DeVries v. City of Austin 110 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1961
Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. 258 Minn. 368 Minn. 1960
Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. 258 Minn. 368 Minn. 1960
Co. 140 Minn. 229 , 167 N.W.
Hanson v. Bailey 83 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1957
Hanson v. Bailey 83 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1957
Co. 140 Minn. 229 , , which is an example of indemnity for one who fails to discover the negligence of another.
Lunderberg v. Bierman 63 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1954
Lunderberg v. Bierman 63 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1954
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Dahl 278 N.W. 591 Minn. 1938
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Dahl 278 N.W. 591 Minn. 1938
Co. 140 Minn. 229, 233 , .
Southern Surety Co. v. Tessum 228 N.W. 326 Minn. 1929
Southern Surety Co. v. Tessum 228 N.W. 326 Minn. 1929
Co. 140 Minn. 229 , 231 , 167 N.W.
Board of Trade Livery Co. v. Georgia Casualty Co. 200 N.W. 633 Minn. 1924
Board of Trade Livery Co. v. Georgia Casualty Co. 200 N.W. 633 Minn. 1924