Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Dunn, 168 N.W. 2.

40 citing documents.

State v. Daniels 380 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1986
State v. Daniels 380 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1986
State v. Dunn, 140 Minn. 308 , 168 N.W.
State v. Thompson 139 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1966
State v. Thompson 139 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1966
The rule under which such testimony becomes admissible once a conspiracy is established is probably as well stated in State v. Dunn, 140 Minn. 308, 317 , , as anywhere.
State v. Mathiasen 127 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1964
State v. Mathiasen 127 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1964
9 See, State v. Dunn, 140 Minn. 308 , ; State v. Star, 248 Minn. 571 , 81 N. W. (2d) 94 ; State v. Briggs, 122 Minn. 493 , .
State v. Guy 105 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1960
State v. Guy 105 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1960
14 State v. Dunn, 140 Minn. 308 , .
State Ex Rel. Redenbaugh v. Rigg 96 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1959
State Ex Rel. Redenbaugh v. Rigg 96 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1959
“Mr. Houston: Well, I think that is perhaps true.” Other evidence before this court relates to the testimony of respondent in State v. Dunn, 140 Minn. 308 , .
State v. Connelly 82 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1957
State v. Connelly 82 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1957
7 State v. Kahner, 217 Minn. 574, 581 , 15 N. W. (2d) 105, 109 , certiorari denied, 323 U. S. 768 , 65 S. Ct. 121 , 89 L. ed. 614; see, State v. Tennyson, 212 Minn. 158 , 2 N. W. (2d) 833 , 139 A. L. R. 987; State v. Dunn, 140 Minn. 308 , ; 5 Dunnell, Dig.
State v. Gulbrandsen 57 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1953
State v. Gulbrandsen 57 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1953
485 ; State v. Dunn, *512 140 Minn. 308 , 168 N.W.
State v. Kahner 15 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 1944
State v. Kahner 15 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 1944
State v. Tennyson, 212 Minn. 158 , 2 N. W. (2d) 833 , 139 A. L. R. 987; State v. Dunn, 140 Minn. 308 , .
State v. Tennyson 2 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1942
State v. Tennyson 2 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1942
See State v. Dunn, 140 Minn. 308 , ; 15 C. J. S., Conspiracy, § 92(c).
State v. Soltau 2 N.W.2d 155 Minn. 1942
State v. Soltau 2 N.W.2d 155 Minn. 1942
State v. Dunn, 140 Minn. 308 , .
State v. Heffelfinger 274 N.W. 234 Minn. 1937
State v. Heffelfinger 274 N.W. 234 Minn. 1937
Nor is he forbidden in an argument to state his opinion as to the conclusions or inferences which the human mind may reasonably draw from the evidence.” State v. Dunn, 140 Minn. 308, 322 , .
State v. Binder 251 N.W. 665 Minn. 1933
State v. Binder 251 N.W. 665 Minn. 1933
State v. Evans, 88 Minn. 262 , *312 268, ; State v. Dunn, 140 Minn. 308, 317 , ; State v. Smith, 144 Minn. 348, 356 , .
State v. Kaufman 214 N.W. 785 Minn. 1927
State v. Kaufman 214 N.W. 785 Minn. 1927
State v. Lewis, 86 Minn. 174 , ; State v. Ames, 90 Minn. 183, 196 , ; State v. Henriksen, 116 Minn. 366, 370 , ; State v. Dunn, 140 Minn. 308, 320 , .
State v. Korsch 210 N.W. 10 Minn. 1926
State v. Korsch 210 N.W. 10 Minn. 1926
State v. Lawlor, 28 Minn. 216 , ; State v. Clements, 82 Minn. 434 , ; State v. Briggs, 122 Minn. 493 , ; State v. Christianson, 131 Minn. 276 , ; State v. Price, 135 Minn. 159 , ; State v. Dunn, 140 Minn. 308 , ; State v. Ettenberg, 145 Minn. 39 , ; State v. Huebsch, 146 Minn. 34 , .
State v. Ryan 194 N.W. 396 Minn. 1923
State v. Ryan 194 N.W. 396 Minn. 1923
State v. Thaden, 43 Minn. 253 , ; State v. Dunn, 140 Minn. 308 , ; State v. Smith, 144 Minn. 348 , .
State v. Anderson 192 N.W. 934 Minn. 1923
State v. Anderson 192 N.W. 934 Minn. 1923
State v. Evans, 88 Minn. 262 , ; State v. Ames, 90 Minn. 183 , ; State v. Dunn, 140 Minn. 308 , ; State v. Ettenberg, 145 Minn. 39 , ; State v. Townley, 149 Minn. 5 , , 17 A. L. R. 253.
State v. Smith 190 N.W. 48 Minn. 1922
State v. Smith 190 N.W. 48 Minn. 1922
We think that the evidence tending to show that defendant and Mrs. Craighead were acting in concert in furtherance of a common purpose to induce Tatro to give the false testimony, was sufficient to make this evidence admissible under the rule applied in State v. Dunn, 140 Minn. 308 , ; State v. Lyons, 144 Minn. 348 , , and other cases.
State v. Townley 182 N.W. 773 Minn. 1921
State v. Townley 182 N.W. 773 Minn. 1921
State v. Thaden, 43 Minn. 253 , ; State v. Palmer, 79 Minn. 428 , ; State v. Dunn, 140 Minn. 308 , ; State v. Lyons, 144 Minn. 348 , ; Hyde v. U. S. 225 U. S. 347 , 32 Sup.
State v. Shea 182 N.W. 445 Minn. 1921
State v. Shea 182 N.W. 445 Minn. 1921
An appeal involving the conviction of one of the defendants is reported in 140 Minn. 308
State v. Smith 175 N.W. 689 Minn. 1919
State v. Smith 175 N.W. 689 Minn. 1919
State v. Cline, 27 S. D. 573, 132 N W. 160; State v. Evans, 88 Minn. 262 , ; State v. Dunn, 140 Minn. 308 , .