DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co., 169 N.W. 541.

32 citing documents.

  • Lemieux v. Bishop 209 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 1973
  • Lemieux v. Bishop 209 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 1973
    See, Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 141 Minn. 154 , Briggs v. Chicago G. W. Ry.
  • Klingbeil v. Truesdell 98 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 1959
  • Klingbeil v. Truesdell 98 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 1959
    2 Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 141 Minn. 154 , ; Lund v. Olson, 182 Minn. 204 , , 75 A. L. R. 371.
  • Monson v. Arcand 58 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1953
  • Monson v. Arcand 58 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1953
    Co. 96 Minn. 213 , ; Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 141 Minn. 154 , ; 5 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Briggs v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. 57 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 1953
  • Briggs v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. 57 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 1953
    1913D, 244; Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 141 Minn. 154 , .” (Italics supplied.)
  • Butler v. Northwestern Hospital 278 N.W. 37 Minn. 1938
  • Butler v. Northwestern Hospital 278 N.W. 37 Minn. 1938
    No wrongdoer should be allowed to apportion or qualify his own wrong; and, if a loss occurs while his wrongful act is in operation and force, and which is attributable thereto, he should be held liable.” In Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 141 Minn. 154, 156 , , defendant drug company had furnished impure ether.
  • Taylor v. Northern States Power Co. 256 N.W. 674 Minn. 1934
  • Taylor v. Northern States Power Co. 256 N.W. 674 Minn. 1934
    P. R. Co. 37 Minn. 485 , , 5 A. S. R. 867 (where prior decisions are cited and the reason for the rule is well stated); Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 141 Minn. 154 , ; Id.
  • Benes v. Campion 244 N.W. 72 Minn. 1932
  • Benes v. Campion 244 N.W. 72 Minn. 1932
    And had Mr. Benes sued the Wrabeks, the following decisions of this court would sustain a recovery: Meshbesher v. Channellene O. & M. Co. 107 Minn. 104 , , 131 A. S. R. 441; Neiman v. Channellene O. & M. Co. 112 Minn. 11 , , 140 A. S. R. 458; Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 141 Minn. 154 , ; McCrossin v. Noyes Bros. & Cutler, Inc. 143 Minn. 181 , ; Ellis v. Lindmark, 177 Minn. 390 , .
  • Peterson v. Langsten 242 N.W. 549 Minn. 1932
  • Peterson v. Langsten 242 N.W. 549 Minn. 1932
    Coultas v. Hennepin Paper Co. 114 Minn. 309 , ; Healy v. Hoy, 115 Minn. 321 ,132 K. W. 208; Wendt v. Bowman & Libby, 126 Minn. 509 , ; Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 141 Minn. 154 , ; Hansman v. Western Union Tel.
  • Beehler v. Fawcett Publications, Inc. 229 N.W. 87 Minn. 1930
  • Beehler v. Fawcett Publications, Inc. 229 N.W. 87 Minn. 1930
    Co. 96 Minn. 213 , ; Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 141 Minn. 154 , .
  • Ellis v. Lindmark 225 N.W. 395 Minn. 1929
  • Ellis v. Lindmark 225 N.W. 395 Minn. 1929
    Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 141 Minn. 154 , ; Meshbesher v. Channellene O. & M. Co. 107 Minn. 104 , , 131 A. S. R. 441; Farrell v. G. O. Miller Co. 147 Minn. 52 , ; Kentucky Ind.
  • Ruud v. Hendrickson 222 N.W. 904 Minn. 1929
  • Ruud v. Hendrickson 222 N.W. 904 Minn. 1929
    1913D, 244; Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 141 Minn. 154 , .
  • Boyle v. Boileau 219 N.W. 866 Minn. 1928
  • Boyle v. Boileau 219 N.W. 866 Minn. 1928
    303; Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 141 Minn. 154 , .
  • Winans v. Northern States Power Co. 196 N.W. 811 Minn. 1924
  • Winans v. Northern States Power Co. 196 N.W. 811 Minn. 1924
    Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 141 Minn. 154 , .
  • State v. Eidsvold Creamery Co. 194 N.W. 17 Minn. 1923
  • State v. Eidsvold Creamery Co. 194 N.W. 17 Minn. 1923
    Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 141 Minn. 154 , .
  • Pete v. Lampi 185 N.W. 653 Minn. 1921
  • Pete v. Lampi 185 N.W. 653 Minn. 1921
    Co. 70 Minn. 278 , ; Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 141 Minn. 154 , .
  • Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 176 N.W. 169 Minn. 1920
  • Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 176 N.W. 169 Minn. 1920
    taken by defendant Parke, Davis & Company [ 141 Minn. 154 , ], This court held that there was evidence to sustain a finding that the ether was unfit for use; that its use was dangerous to life; that defendant Parke, Davis & Company, was negligent in putting it on sale, and that its use was a proximate cause of decedent’s death-.