Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Greenfield v. Hill City Land, Loan & Lumber Co., 170 N.W. 343.

25 citing documents.

Wilmington Trust, National Association, Minn. 2023
The property in his possession is in custodia legis.”); Greenfield v. Hill City Land, Loan & Lumber Co., (“A receiver is in law the arm of the court.
Bifulk v. Evans 353 N.W.2d 258 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Bifulk v. Evans 353 N.W.2d 258 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The trial court found appellants were in privity based in part on Greenfield v. Hill City Land, L & L Co., 141 Minn. 393, 395 , 170 N.W.
Aronovitch v. Levy 56 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 1953
Aronovitch v. Levy 56 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 1953
Co. 141 Minn. 393 , ; Vadnais v. State, 224 Minn. 439 , 28 N. W. (2d) 694 .
Vadnais v. State 28 N.W.2d 694 Minn. 1947
Vadnais v. State 28 N.W.2d 694 Minn. 1947
Greenfield v. Hill City Land, L. & L. Co. 141 Minn. 393 , ; Shearer v. Christy, 136 Minn. 111 , .
State Ex Rel. Claude v. District Court Fourth Judicial District 283 N.W. 738 Minn. 1939
State Ex Rel. Claude v. District Court Fourth Judicial District 283 N.W. 738 Minn. 1939
Haugan v. Netland, 51 Minn. 552 , ; Greenfield v. Hill City Land, L. & L. Co. 141 Minn. 393 , .
Northwestern Fuel Co. v. Live Stock State Bank 234 N.W. 304 Minn. 1931
Northwestern Fuel Co. v. Live Stock State Bank 234 N.W. 304 Minn. 1931
And the point is also made that appellants cannot question the order appointing the receiver on this appeal, citing Greenfield v. Hill City L. L. & L. Co. 141 Minn. 393 , , and cases therein referred to.
Robie v. Holdahl 219 N.W. 945 Minn. 1928
Robie v. Holdahl 219 N.W. 945 Minn. 1928
Co. 141 Minn. 393 , ; Farwell, O. K. & Co. v. Goodhue Co. Co-op.
Windom National Bank v. Reno 214 N.W. 886 Minn. 1927
Windom National Bank v. Reno 214 N.W. 886 Minn. 1927
We do not think Greenfield v. Hill City L. L. & L. Co. 141 Minn. 393 , , cited by appellants, support their right to attack the appointment, but the reverse.
In Re Receivership of Southwestern Minnesota Land Co. 202 N.W. 69 Minn. 1925
In Re Receivership of Southwestern Minnesota Land Co. 202 N.W. 69 Minn. 1925
Greenfield v. Hill City L. L. & L. Co. 141 Minn. 393 , .
Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co. v. Goodhue County Co-Operative Co. 199 N.W. 436 Minn. 1924
Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co. v. Goodhue County Co-Operative Co. 199 N.W. 436 Minn. 1924
Harrison v. Carman, 149 Minn. 365 , ; Greenfield v. Hill City L. L. & L. Co. 141 Minn. 393 ; Finch, Van Slyck & McConville v. Vanasek, 132 Minn. 9 , ; Straw & Ellsworth Mnfg.
Phelps v. Consolidated Vermillion & Extension Co. 195 N.W. 923 Minn. 1923
Phelps v. Consolidated Vermillion & Extension Co. 195 N.W. 923 Minn. 1923
Greenfield v. Hill City Land, L. & L. Co. 141 Minn. 393 , ; Bernheimer v. Converse, 206 U. S. 516 , 27 Sup.
Henderson v. Crosby 194 N.W. 641 Minn. 1923
Henderson v. Crosby 194 N.W. 641 Minn. 1923
Farmers L. & T. Co. v. Minneapolis E. & M. Works, 35 Minn. 543 , ; Greenfield v. Hill City L. L. & L. Co. 141 Minn. 393 , .
Harrison v. Carman 183 N.W. 826 Minn. 1921
Harrison v. Carman 183 N.W. 826 Minn. 1921
Co. v. Kilbourne B. & S. Co. 80 Minn. 125 , ; Pinch, Van Slyck & M. v. Vanasek, 132 Minn. 9 , ; Greenfield v. Hill City L. L. & L. Co. 141 Minn. 393 , .