Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Seamer v. Great Northern Railway Co., 172 N.W. 765.

46 citing documents.

Thomas Oil, Inc. v. Onsgaard 215 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1974
Thomas Oil, Inc. v. Onsgaard 215 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1974
Williams v. Rolfe 114 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1962
Williams v. Rolfe 114 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1962
Co. 142 Minn. 376 , ; State ex rel.
Laurie v. Mueller 78 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 1956
Laurie v. Mueller 78 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 1956
In that case this court said ( 142 Minn. 375 , ): “In the instant case defendant did not own or control the revolver, and had no previous knowledge of its presence on the premises.
City of Duluth v. Northland Greyhound Lines 52 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1952
City of Duluth v. Northland Greyhound Lines 52 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1952
Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth 48 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1951
Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth 48 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1951
Co. 142 Minn. 376 , ; Minnesota W. G. Co-op.
Dimke v. Finke 295 N.W. 75 Minn. 1940
Dimke v. Finke 295 N.W. 75 Minn. 1940
Co. 142 Minn. 376 , ; Magoun v. Illinois T. & S. Bank, 170 U. S. 283, 300 , 18 S. Ct. 594 , 42 L. ed. 1037; Bosley v. McLaughlin, 236 U. S. 385 , 35 S. Ct. 345 , 59 L. ed. 632.
State Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate Court 287 N.W. 297 Minn. 1939
State Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate Court 287 N.W. 297 Minn. 1939
Stritzke v. Chicago Great Western Railroad 251 N.W. 532 Minn. 1933
Stritzke v. Chicago Great Western Railroad 251 N.W. 532 Minn. 1933
Co. 142 Minn. 376 , 172 N.W.
Independent School District No. 35 v. Borgen 246 N.W. 119 Minn. 1932
Independent School District No. 35 v. Borgen 246 N.W. 119 Minn. 1932
Co. 142 Minn. 376, 383 , .
State Ex Rel. Williams v. St. Paul Fire Department Relief Ass'n 222 N.W. 283 Minn. 1928
State Ex Rel. Williams v. St. Paul Fire Department Relief Ass'n 222 N.W. 283 Minn. 1928
Ryan v. St. Paul Union Depot Co. 210 N.W. 32 Minn. 1926
Ryan v. St. Paul Union Depot Co. 210 N.W. 32 Minn. 1926
Minnesota Wheat Growers Co-Operative Marketing Ass'n v. Huggins 203 N.W. 420 Minn. 1925
Minnesota Wheat Growers Co-Operative Marketing Ass'n v. Huggins 203 N.W. 420 Minn. 1925
Co. 142 Minn. 376 , ; Mathison v. Minneapolis St.
State v. Fairmont Creamery Co. 202 N.W. 714 Minn. 1925
State v. Fairmont Creamery Co. 202 N.W. 714 Minn. 1925
State v. Pocock 201 N.W. 610 Minn. 1925
State v. Pocock 201 N.W. 610 Minn. 1925
Co. 142 Minn. 376 , ; State v. Dirnberger, 152 Minn. 44 , ; State ex rel.
Lombard v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 199 N.W. 887 Minn. 1924
Lombard v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 199 N.W. 887 Minn. 1924
Co. 142 Minn. 376 , , and the cases there cited.
State ex rel. Greenberg v. Erickson 198 N.W. 1000 Minn. 1924
State ex rel. Greenberg v. Erickson 198 N.W. 1000 Minn. 1924
Co. 142 Minn. 376 , , and cases cited; Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
State v. Cloudy & Traverse 198 N.W. 457 Minn. 1924
State v. Cloudy & Traverse 198 N.W. 457 Minn. 1924
Ct. 273, 63 L. ed. 597; Seamer v. Great Northern Railway Co. 142 Minn. 376 , .
Dushaw v. Great Northern Railway Co. 195 N.W. 893 Minn. 1923
Dushaw v. Great Northern Railway Co. 195 N.W. 893 Minn. 1923
Fullerton-krueger Lumber Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 194 N.W. 9 Minn. 1923
Fullerton-krueger Lumber Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 194 N.W. 9 Minn. 1923
Co. 142 Minn. 376 , ; Herr v. Chicago, M. & St.
Herr v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 191 N.W. 607 Minn. 1923
Herr v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 191 N.W. 607 Minn. 1923
Sinderson v. Payne 186 N.W. 237 Minn. 1922
Sinderson v. Payne 186 N.W. 237 Minn. 1922
Strand v. Chicago Great Western Railroad 179 N.W. 369 Minn. 1920
Strand v. Chicago Great Western Railroad 179 N.W. 369 Minn. 1920
Larson v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. 172 N.W. 762 Minn. 1919
Larson v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. 172 N.W. 762 Minn. 1919
Co. infra, page 376, , and after full and careful consideration it was held that the statute of 1915 changed the former rule in this state, and imposed on the railway company liability for injury to an employee caused by the negligence of a coemployee, although the injury did not result from a “railroad hazard.” It follows that, although