DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Finberg v. St. Paul Gas Light Co., 170 N.W. 696.

13 citing documents.

  • Zuelch v. Droege 56 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 1953
    752; Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , ; Kins v. Ginzky, 135 Minn. 327 , ; Ham v. Johnson, 55 Minn. 115 , ; 5 Dunnell, Dig.
  • McCarty v. Nelson 47 N.W.2d 595 Minn. 1951
    Carlson v. Carlson, 211 Minn. 297 , ; Jannetta v. Jannetta, 205 Minn. 266 , ; Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , .
  • Blacktin v. McCarthy 42 N.W.2d 818 Minn. 1950
    As stated in the Stenshoel case ( 142 Minn. 16 , ): “* * * Though technically the plaintiff lost no wages, for she was getting none, it was proper for the jury in fixing her damages to take into consideration her earning capacity, what her services were worth, and the loss or decrease of her ability to continue for a time any performance, or the full performance, of
  • Anderson v. Anderson 266 N.W. 841 Minn. 1936
    These cases are cited from this court: *255 Fiske v. Lawton, 124 Minn. 85 , ; Kins v. Ginzky, 135 Minn. 327 , ; Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , ; Hinkle v. Berg, 156 Minn. 307 , ; Smith v. Erlandson, 160 Minn. 168 , ; Sheehan v. Nelson, 168 Minn. 426 , .
  • In Re Estate of Empenger 259 N.W. 795 Minn. 1935
    Examples of such are Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , ; Hinkle v. Berg, 156 Minn. 307 , 194 N.W.
  • Hanefeld v. Fairbrother 254 N.W. 821 Minn. 1934
    Plaintiff has not established that she made partial performance, by way of services or otherwise, to entitle her now to 'a decree of specific performance, under the rule of such cases as Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , .
  • Smith v. Hansen 219 N.W. 151 Minn. 1928
    As supporting the contention of error appellant cites Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , ; Wagner v. Seaberg, 138 Minn. 37 , ; Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , ; In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , .
  • Sheehan v. Nelson 210 N.W. 284 Minn. 1926
    Powers v. Johnson, 107 Minn. 476 , ; Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , ; Hinkle v. Berg, 156 Minn. 307 , ; Smith v. Erlandson, 160 Minn. 168 , , and cases cited in those cases.
  • Estate of Havenmaier v. Rengstorf 203 N.W. 958 Minn. 1925
    In Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , , there was a finding of no contract.
  • Smith v. Erlandson 199 N.W. 927 Minn. 1924
    609; Haubrich v. Haubrich, 118 Minn. 394 , ; Robertson v. Corcoran, 125 Minn. 118 , ; Kins v. Ginzky, 135 Minn. 327 , ; Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , ; Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , .
  • Kempe v. Hack 196 N.W. 180 Minn. 1923
    Brasch v. Reeves, 124 Minn. 114 , ; Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , .
  • Hinkle v. Berg 194 N.W. 637 Minn. 1923
    The psychology of these cases, as much as anything, has led to the adoption of the rule that the evidence therein will receive strict scrutiny, and that the defendant must prevail unless the plaintiff has established a case by evidence “clear, satisfactory and convincing.” See Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , , and cases cited.
  • Colby v. Street 178 N.W. 599 Minn. 1920
    420; Robertson v. Corcoran, 125 Minn. 118 , ; and *295 Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , .