Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. McCarthy Bros. v. District Court, 169 N.W. 274.

39 citing documents.

Aleckson v. Kennedy Motor Sales Co. 55 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1952
Aleckson v. Kennedy Motor Sales Co. 55 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1952
McCarthy Brothers Co. v. District Court, 141 Minn. 61 , , as an example of a case where no issue was made of the ref erability.
Derosier v. Jay W. Craig Co. 14 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1944
Fitzgerald v. Economic Laboratory, Inc. 12 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1943
Fitzgerald v. Economic Laboratory, Inc. 12 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1943
McCarthy Brothers Co. v. District Court, 141 Minn. 61 , ; Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co. 150 Minn. 1 , , 20 A. L. R. 316; Krekelberg v. M. A. Floyd Co. 166 Minn. 149 , ; Bradtmiller v. Liquid Carbonic Co. 173 Minn. 481 , ; Brameld v. Albert Dickinson Co. 186 Minn. 89 , ; Rice v. Keystone View Co. 210
Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 6 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1942
Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 6 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1942
McCarthy Brothers Co. v. District Court, 141 Minn. 61 , .
Rice v. Keystone View Co. 297 N.W. 841 Minn. 1941
Rice v. Keystone View Co. 297 N.W. 841 Minn. 1941
McCarthy Bros. Co. v. District Court, 141 Minn. 61 , ; Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co. 150 Minn. 1 , , 20 A. L. R. 316; Krekelberg v. M. A. Floyd Co. 166 Minn. 149 , ; Bradtmiller v. Liquid Carbonic Co. 173 Minn. 481 , ; Brameld v. Albert Dickinson Co. 186 Minn. 89 , .
Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council No. 32 297 N.W. 4 Minn. 1941
Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council No. 32 297 N.W. 4 Minn. 1941
McCarthy Bros. Co. v. District Court, 141 Minn. 61 , .” Bearing upon the question whether Corcoran was killed while “in the course of his employment,” testimony was admitted that his hours were unlimited and that he was subject to call any time during the day or night.
Howlett v. Midwest Distributors, Inc. 277 N.W. 913 Minn. 1938
Howlett v. Midwest Distributors, Inc. 277 N.W. 913 Minn. 1938
McCarthy Bros. Co. v. District Court, 141 Minn. 61 , .
Brameld v. Albert Dickinson Co. 242 N.W. 465 Minn. 1932
Brameld v. Albert Dickinson Co. 242 N.W. 465 Minn. 1932
McCarthy Brothers Co. v. District Court, 141 Minn. 61 , ; State ex rel.
Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 225 N.W. 428 Minn. 1929
Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 225 N.W. 428 Minn. 1929
McCarthy Bros. Co. v. *506 District Court, 141 Minn. 61 , ; Hansen v. N. W. Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , ; Wold v. Chevrolet Motor Co. 147 Minn. 17 , ; Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co. 150 Minn. 1 , , 20 A. L. R. 516; Bookman v. Lyle C. & R. E Co. 153 Minn. 479 , ; Reese v. National Surety Co 162 Minn. 49
Bradtmiller v. Liquid Carbonic Co. 217 N.W. 680 Minn. 1928
Bradtmiller v. Liquid Carbonic Co. 217 N.W. 680 Minn. 1928
McCarthy Brothers Co. v. District Court, 141 Minn. 61 , ; Krekelberg v. M. A. Floyd Co. 166 Minn. 149 , .
Ginsburg v. Byers 214 N.W. 55 Minn. 1927
Ginsburg v. Byers 214 N.W. 55 Minn. 1927
McCarthy v. District Court, 141 Minn. 61 , ; State ex rel.
Behr v. Soth 212 N.W. 461 Minn. 1927
Behr v. Soth 212 N.W. 461 Minn. 1927
McCarthy Bros. Co. v. District Court, 141 Minn. 61 , ; Stevens v. Village of Nashwauk, 161 Minn. 20 , .
Angell v. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co. 210 N.W. 1004 Minn. 1926
Angell v. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co. 210 N.W. 1004 Minn. 1926
State v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205 , , 3 A. L. R. 1347; State v. District Court, 141 Minn. 61 , ; Stansberry v. Monitor S. Co. 150 Minn. 1 , , 20 A. L. R. 316.
Krekelberg v. M. A. Floyd Co. 207 N.W. 193 Minn. 1926
Krekelberg v. M. A. Floyd Co. 207 N.W. 193 Minn. 1926
McCarthy Bros. v. District Court, 141 Minn. 61 , .
Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 198 N.W. 290 Minn. 1924
Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 198 N.W. 290 Minn. 1924
McCarthy Bros. Co. v. District Court, 141 Minn. 61 , .
Patterson v. O'Neil 185 N.W. 948 Minn. 1921
Patterson v. O'Neil 185 N.W. 948 Minn. 1921
McCarty Bros. Co. v. District Court, 141 Minn. 61 , .
Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co. 183 N.W. 977 Minn. 1921
Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co. 183 N.W. 977 Minn. 1921
McCarthy Bros. v. District Court of Hennepin County, 141 Minn. 61 , .
Wold v. Chevrolet Motor Co. of Minnesota, Inc. 179 N.W. 219 Minn. 1920
Wold v. Chevrolet Motor Co. of Minnesota, Inc. 179 N.W. 219 Minn. 1920
He was wholly free as to time, place or weather.” Under those circumstances it was held that “the injury cannot be said reasonably to have been contemplated as the result of the exposure of the employment.” In the case at bar the employee was engaged as a traveling salesman, and under such cases as State v. District Court of Hennepin County, 141 Minn. 61 , , and State v. District Court of Hennepin County, 141 Minn. 348 , , we think he was protected when on the trip he was taking.
Hansen v. Northwestern Fuel Co. 174 N.W. 726 Minn. 1919
Hansen v. Northwestern Fuel Co. 174 N.W. 726 Minn. 1919
Mahowald v. Thompson-Starrett Co. 134 Minn. 113 , ; State v. District Court of Hennepin County, 141 Minn. 61 , ; State v. District Court, 143 Minn. 144 , ; Grieb v. Hammerle, 222 N. Y. 382 , 118 N. E. 805 ; Mueller Const. Co. v. Industrial Board, 283 Ill.
State ex rel. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America v. District Court 170 N.W. 218 Minn. 1919
State ex rel. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America v. District Court 170 N.W. 218 Minn. 1919
It is much stronger than the evidence in State v. District Court of Hennepin County, supra, page 61, , which is in some respects similar.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by