DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hartigan v. Hartigan, 171 N.W. 925.

26 citing documents.

  • Abbott v. Abbott 282 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1979
  • Abbott v. Abbott 282 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1979
    Hartigan v. Hartigan, 142 Minn. 274 , 171 N.W.
  • Schmidt v. Schmidt 146 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 1966
  • Schmidt v. Schmidt 146 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 1966
    Hartigan v. Hartigan, 142 Minn. 274 , ; Plankers v. Plankers, 178 Minn. 31 , ; Conklin v. Conklin, 223 Minn. 449 , 27 N. W. (2d) 275 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 1274.
  • Zieman v. Zieman 121 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 1963
  • Zieman v. Zieman 121 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 1963
    8 Conklin v. Conklin, 223 Minn. 449 , 27 N. W. (2d) 275 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 1274; Hartigan v. Hartigan, 142 Minn. 274 , .
  • Southdale Center, Inc. v. Lewis 110 N.W.2d 857 Minn. 1961
  • Criticized Southdale Center, Inc. v. Lewis 110 N.W.2d 857 Minn. 1961
    The court criticized decisions adopting a contrary theory by observing that many of them seemed to be ( 142 Minn. 266 , ) “but offshoots of judicial tenderness in dealing with the rights and liabilities of sureties” and specifically decided: “* * * no notice of acceptance is necessary where the contract of guaranty on its face acknowledges the receipt of a valuable consideration by the guarantor, however small, is definite as to time a
  • Boiteau v. Boiteau 33 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1948
  • Boiteau v. Boiteau 33 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1948
    Thus, in Hartigan v. Hartigan, 142 Minn. 274, 277 , , we stated: “That a divorced wife’s remarriage, while not ipso facto canceling either future or accrued alimony granted for support merely, strongly impels the court to cut off the future, and permit judicial discretion to annul the accrued, is held in Cohen v. Cohen [ 150 Cal.
  • Conklin v. Conklin 27 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1947
  • Conklin v. Conklin 27 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1947
    Hartigan v. Hartigan, 142 Minn. 274 , ; Bensel v. Hall, 177 Minn. 178 , .
  • Wilcox v. Wilcox 24 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1946
  • Wilcox v. Wilcox 24 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1946
    In Hartigan v. Hartigan, 142 Minn. 274 , 277, 171 N.W.
  • Quist v. Quist 290 N.W. 561 Minn. 1940
  • Quist v. Quist 290 N.W. 561 Minn. 1940
    Where the divorced husband, as here, Avith full knowledge of the facts, sits by without requesting a revision of the decree, “he has not much claim upon judicial discretion as to the instalments accruing in the meantime.” Hartigan v. Hartigan, 142 Minn. 274, 278 , .
  • Lindbloom v. Lindbloom 230 N.W. 117 Minn. 1930
  • Lindbloom v. Lindbloom 230 N.W. 117 Minn. 1930
    Hartigan v. Hartigan, 142 Minn. 274 , , cited by plaintiff, involved no misconduct of the wife subsequent to the decree.
  • Plankers v. Plankers 225 N.W. 913 Minn. 1929
  • Plankers v. Plankers 225 N.W. 913 Minn. 1929
    Hartigan v. Hartigan, 142 Minn. 274 , ; Bensel v. Hall, 177 Minn. 178 , .
  • Bensel v. Hall 225 N.W. 104 Minn. 1929
  • Bensel v. Hall 225 N.W. 104 Minn. 1929
    Hartigan v. Hartigan, 142 Minn. 274 , .
  • Holton v. Holton 190 N.W. 542 Minn. 1922
  • Holton v. Holton 190 N.W. 542 Minn. 1922
    Our own statute received practically the same construction in Hartigan v. Hartigan, 142 Minn. 274 , ; S. C. 145 Minn. 27 , .
  • Hartigan v. Hartigan 176 N.W. 180 Minn. 1920
  • Hartigan v. Hartigan 176 N.W. 180 Minn. 1920
    Hartigan v. Hartigan, 142 Minn. 274 , .