Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Roerig v. Houghton, 175 N.W. 542.

33 citing documents.

Arianna Anderson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See, (discussing official immunity with no exception for equitable relief); (same).
In re Request for Adoption of Findings of Fact & Conclusions Setting Forth the Reasons for the December … 439 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re Winona Cty. Mun. Solid Waste 439 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re Winona Cty. Mun. Solid Waste 439 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Roerig *58 v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 231 , 175 N.W.
In re Request for Adoption of Findings of Fact & Conclusions Setting Forth the Reasons for the December … 439 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Roerig *58 v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 231 , 175 N.W.
Cairl v. State 323 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1982
Cairl v. State 323 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1982
Cf. Roerig v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 231 , 175 N.W.
Hage v. Stade 304 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1981
Peterson v. Knutson 233 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 1975
Peterson v. Knutson 233 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 1975
916 (1930); Roerig v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 231 , 175 N.W.
DePalma v. Rosen 199 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1972
DePalma v. Rosen 199 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1972
Stewart v. Case, 53 Minn. 62 , cited with approval in Roerig v. Hough *16 ton, 144 Minn. 231
Hoffert v. Owatonna Inn Towne Motel, Inc. 199 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 1972
Hoffert v. Owatonna Inn Towne Motel, Inc. 199 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 1972
This court in Roerig v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 231, 235 , held that a building inspector acts exclusively for the benefit of the public.
Anderson v. City of Minneapolis 178 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1970
Anderson v. City of Minneapolis 178 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1970
Paul, 240 Minn. 522 , 62 N. W. (2d) 363 ; Lowry v. City of Mankato, 231 Minn. 108 , 42 N. W. (2d) 553 ; Roerig v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 231 , ; Lerch v. City of Duluth, 88 Minn. 295 , .
McCorkell v. City of Northfield 123 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 1963
McCorkell v. City of Northfield 123 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 1963
He also held, apparently under the authority of Roerig v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 231 , , and Stevens v. North States Motor, Inc. 161 Minn. 345 , , 40 A. L. R. 36, that the city officials named as defendants could not be liable because the activity did not involve an exercise of ministerial duties required to be performed by them in obedience to a mandate of legal authority.
Hoppe v. Klapperich 28 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1947
Hoppe v. Klapperich 28 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1947
See, Roerig v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 231 , ; 30 Am.
Robinette v. Price 8 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1943
Robinette v. Price 8 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1943
Cook v. Trovatten, 200 Minn. 221 , ; Nelson v. Babcock, 188 Minn. 584 , , 90 A. L. R. 1472; Roerig v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 231 , ; 43 Am.
Linder v. Foster 295 N.W. 299 Minn. 1940
Linder v. Foster 295 N.W. 299 Minn. 1940
142 Minn. 194 , ; Roerig v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 231 , ; Wilbrecht v. Babcock, 179 Minn. 263 , .
Barmel v. Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary District 277 N.W. 208 Minn. 1938
Barmel v. Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary District 277 N.W. 208 Minn. 1938
In Roerig v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 231, 233 , , this court, speaking through Commissioner Lees, said: “It is well settled that a municipal corporation cannot be held in damages for the manner in which it exercises its discretionary *628 powers of a public, legislative or quasi-judicial nature.
State Ex Rel. Smiley v. Holm 243 N.W. 133 Minn. 1932
State Ex Rel. Smiley v. Holm 243 N.W. 133 Minn. 1932
The principle in these cases may be analogous to that in Roerig v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 231, 236 , .
Wilbrecht v. Babcock 228 N.W. 916 Minn. 1930
Wilbrecht v. Babcock 228 N.W. 916 Minn. 1930
Stevens v. North States Motor, Inc. 161 Minn. 345 , , 40 A. L. R. 36; Roerig v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 231 , ; Bolland v. Gihlstorf, 134 Minn. 41 , ; Christensen v. Plummer, 130 Minn. 440 , ; Stewart v. Case, 53 Minn. 62 , , 39 A. S. R. 575; Stewart v. Cooley, 23 Minn. 347 , 23 Am.
State v. Chandler 197 N.W. 847 Minn. 1924
Miller v. Reiter 192 N.W. 740 Minn. 1923
Miller v. Reiter 192 N.W. 740 Minn. 1923
His situation is not that of the defendant in Roerig v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 231 , , who was exercising governmental discretion.