Cited by

See, e.g., Hansen v. Northwestern Fuel Co., 144 Minn. 105, 108 , 174 N.W.

Hansen v. Northwestern Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , ; Uotila v. Oliver Iron Min.

Hansen v. N. W. Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , ; Lindell v. Minnesota American Legion Pub.

Mahowald v. ThompsonStarrett Co. 134 Minn. 113, 117 , , ; Hansen v. Northwestern Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , ; Bookman v. Lyle C. & R. E. Co. 153 Minn. 479 , ; Annotation, 51 A. L. R. 514; Horovitz, Workmen’s Compensation, pp. 95-105.

Hansen v. Northwestern Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , ; Johnston v. W. S. Nott Co. 183 Minn. 309 , .

Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 .

London & L. I. Co. v. District Court, 141 Minn. 348 , ; Hansen v. N. W. Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , ; Kaletha v. Hall Mercantile Co. 157 Minn. 290 , ; Behr v. Soth, 170 Minn. 278 , ; Moore v. J. A. McNulty Co. 171 Minn. 75 , ; Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 172 Minn. 439 , .

Peoples C. & I. Co. v. District Court, 129 Minn. 502 , , L. R. A. 1916A, 344; Hansen v. N. W. Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , .

Rau v. District Court, 138 Minn. 250 , , L. R. A. 1918F, 918; Hansen v. N. W. Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , ; State ex rel.

In Hansen v. N. W. Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , , the court definitely committed itself to the proposition that an injury from a so-called street risk, in the course of employment, that is, when the employe is on his job or at his work, is one arising out of his employment.

McCarthy Bros. Co. v. *506 District Court, 141 Minn. 61 , ; Hansen v. N. W. Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , ; Wold v. Chevrolet Motor Co. 147 Minn. 17 , ; Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co. 150 Minn. 1 , , 20 A. L. R. 516; Bookman v. Lyle C. & R. E Co. 153 Minn. 479 , ; Reese v. National Surety Co 162 Minn. 493 , ; Meyer v. Royalton Oil Co. 167 Minn 51

& M. Co. v. District Court, 129 Minn. 176 , ; Hansen v. Northwestern Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , ; Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 158 Minn. 495 , ; Olson v. Robinson, Straus & Co. 168 Minn. 114 , ; Orcutt v. Trustees of Wesley M. E. Church, 170 Minn. 97 , ; Moore v. J. A. McNulty Co. 171 Minn. 75 , ; Nygaard v. Throndson Brothers, 173

Hansen v. N. W. Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , ; Bookman v. Lyle C. & R. Eq.

Co. 126 Minn. 286 , , L. R. A. 1916D, 412; Mahowald v. Thompson-Starrett Co. 134 Minn. 113 , , ; Hansen v. N. W. Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , .

Co. 143 Minn. 129 , ; Hansen v. N. W. Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , ; Podgorski v. Kerwin, 144 Minn. 313 , 175 N. W. *393 694; Gibbs v. Almstrom, 145 Minn. 35 , , 11 A. L. R. 227; Metropolitan Milk Co. v. M. St.

Paul G. L. Co. 152 Minn. 197 , ; Hansen v. Northwestern Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , ; Metropolitan Milk Co. v. M. St.

L. & L. I. Co. v. District Court, 141 Minn. 348 , ; Hansen v. N. W. Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , .

Mahowald v. Thompson-Starrett Co. 134 Minn. 113 , , ; State v. District Court of Wilkin County, 136 Minn. 151 , ; Hansen v. Northwestern Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , ; Katzenmeier v. Doeren, 150 Minn. 521 , .

In Hansen v. N. W. Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , , the court definitely committed itself to the doctrine that an injury to an employe, engaged in his employer’s service in a duty calling him upon the street, by what is usually called a street risk to which his work subjects him, arises as a matter of law out of his employment, although others so empl

Co. 143 Minn. 129 , ; that the statute gives no right to proceed against the third party under the compensation act, Hansen v. Northwestern Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , ; and in Metropolitan Milk Co. v. Minneapolis St.