Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Bank v. Strandberg, 180 N.W. 1006.

30 citing documents.

Texas Commerce Bank v. Olson 416 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Texas Commerce Bank v. Olson 416 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
911, 912 (1927) (transfers between husband and wife are prima facie fraudulent as to existing creditors); State Bank of Winsted v. Strandberg, 148 Minn. 108, 111 , 180 N.W.
Bigelow v. Galway 281 N.W.2d 835 Minn. 1979
Bigelow v. Galway 281 N.W.2d 835 Minn. 1979
See, also, State Bank of Winsted v. Strandberg, 148 Minn. 108 , 180 N.W.
Erickson v. Paulson 87 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1957
Distinguished Erickson v. Paulson 87 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1957
See, also, State Bank of Winsted v. Strandberg, 148 Minn. 108 , .
LaBelle v. Swanson 78 N.W.2d 358 Minn. 1956
LaBelle v. Swanson 78 N.W.2d 358 Minn. 1956
1 See, State Bank v. Strandberg, 148 Minn. 108 , ; Ohrmann v. Chicago & N. W. Ry.
Anderson v. Birkeland 38 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1949
Anderson v. Birkeland 38 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1949
State Bank v. Strandberg, 148 Minn. 108 , .
Johnson v. Farrell 298 N.W. 256 Minn. 1941
Johnson v. Farrell 298 N.W. 256 Minn. 1941
State Bank v. Strandberg, 148 Minn. 108, 111 , ; Trainor v. Buchanan Coal Co. 154 Minn. 204 , ; McKnight v. City of Duluth, 181 Minn. *355 450, .
Weese v. Weese 254 N.W. 816 Minn. 1934
Weese v. Weese 254 N.W. 816 Minn. 1934
Benson v. Nash, 75 Minn. 341 , ; Manwaring v. O’Brien, 75 Minn. 542 , ; Carson v. Hawley, 82 Minn. 204 , ; Dyer v. Rowe, 82 Minn. 223 , ; State Bank of Winsted v. Strandberg, 148 Minn. 108 , ; State Bank of Gibbon v. Walter, 167 Minn. 37 , ; Schumacher v. Streich, 168 Minn. 497 , ; Barnard v. Seaman, 169 Minn. 409 , ; Nash v. Bengtson, 179 Minn. 7 , .
Dougherty v. Garrick 239 N.W. 153 Minn. 1931
Dougherty v. Garrick 239 N.W. 153 Minn. 1931
In State Bank v. Strandberg, 148 Minn. 108 , , an interested Avitness testified to a conversation with a living person, but in that conversation recited to the living person a conversation had by the Avitness Avitli a person since deceased.
McKnight v. City of Duluth 232 N.W. 795 Minn. 1930
McKnight v. City of Duluth 232 N.W. 795 Minn. 1930
State Bank v. Strandberg, 148 Minn. 108 , ; Trainor v. Buchanan Coal Co. 154 Minn. 204 , .
State v. Sweeney 231 N.W. 225 Minn. 1930
State v. Sweeney 231 N.W. 225 Minn. 1930
§ 1770; Fredin v. Richards, 66 Minn. 46 , ; McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 42 , ; State Bank v. Strandberg, 148 Minn. 108 , ; State Bank v. Fassbender, 164 Minn. 317 , ; Pleason R. & I. Co. v. Kleinman, 165 Minn. 342 , .
Pleason Realty & Investment Co. v. Kleinman 206 N.W. 645 Minn. 1925
Pleason Realty & Investment Co. v. Kleinman 206 N.W. 645 Minn. 1925
State Bank v. Strandberg, 148 Minn. 108 , ; McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 42 , ; Fredin v. Richards, 66 Minn. 46 , ; Farnham v. Kennedy, 28 Minn. 365 , .
State Bank of Gibbon v. Fassbender 204 N.W. 953 Minn. 1925
State Bank of Gibbon v. Fassbender 204 N.W. 953 Minn. 1925
Fredin v. Richards, 66 Minn. 46 , ; McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 42 , ; State Bank v. Strandberg, 148 Minn. 108 , .
Sund v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. 204 N.W. 628 Minn. 1925
Sund v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. 204 N.W. 628 Minn. 1925
was proper to receive such statements made by tbe plaintiff to bis doctor as showing tbe basis upon which tbe doctor based his opinion as to tbe plaintiff’s mental condition.” But tbe witness was not “his doctor.” Tbe suggestion *27 that tbe testimony was properly in tbe case for tbe limited purpose is untenable, and therefore cannot be within the doctrine of State Bank of Winsted v. Strandberg, 148 Minn. 108 , .
Morrow v. Porter 202 N.W. 53 Minn. 1925
Morrow v. Porter 202 N.W. 53 Minn. 1925
It is not controlled by State Bank v. Strandberg, 148 Minn. 108 , .
Hanson v. Johnson 201 N.W. 322 Minn. 1924
Hanson v. Johnson 201 N.W. 322 Minn. 1924
Fredin v. Richards, 66 Minn. 46 , ; State Bank of Winsted v. Strandberg, 148 Minn. 108 , ; Hughes, Ev.