Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Banner Grain Co. v. Houghton, 170 N.W. 853.

28 citing documents.

Thomas Coleman v. City of Stillwater, RMR of Stillwater, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Thomas Coleman v. City of Stillwater, RMR of Stillwater, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2023
), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Hoskin v. City of Eagan 632 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Hoskin v. City of Eagan 632 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Banner Grain Co. v. Houghton, 142 Minn. 28, 30 , 170 N.W.
Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 589 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 589 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Banner Grain Co. v. Houghton, 142 Minn. 28, 30 , 170 N.W.
Mauer v. Kircher 587 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Mauer v. Kircher 587 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Banner Grain Co. v. Houghton, 142 Minn. 28, 30 , 170 N.W.
Coyle v. City of Delano 526 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Coyle v. City of Delano 526 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Banner Grain Co. v. Houghton, 142 Minn. 28, 30 , 170 N.W.
Haen v. Renville County Board of Commissioners 495 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Haen v. Renville County Board of Commissioners 495 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Banner Grain Co. v. Houghton, 142 Minn. 28, 30 , 170 N.W.
Northwest Publications, Inc. v. City of Saint Paul 435 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Northwest Publications, Inc. v. City of Saint Paul 435 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Banner Grain Co. v. Houghton, 142 Minn. 28, 30 , 170 N.W.
Popp v. County of Winona 430 N.W.2d 19 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Popp v. County of Winona 430 N.W.2d 19 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Banner Grain Co. v. Houghton, 142 Minn. 28, 30 , 170 N.W.
Tyo v. Ilse 380 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Tyo v. Ilse 380 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Banner Grain Co. v. Houghton, 142 Minn. 28, 30 , 170 N.W.
State Ex Rel. v. Houghton 204 N.W. 569 Minn. 1925
State ex rel. Beery v. Houghton 204 N.W. 569 Minn. 1925
State Ex Rel. v. Houghton 204 N.W. 569 Minn. 1925
In State v. Houghton, 142 Minn. 28 , 170 N.W.
State ex rel. Beery v. Houghton 204 N.W. 569 Minn. 1925
In State v. Houghton, 142 Minn. 28 , , the exclusion of a cereal mill, disturbing a residential district through dust and unwholesome odors and noise, was sustained.
City of St. Paul v. Kessler 178 N.W. 171 Minn. 1920
City of St. Paul v. Kessler 178 N.W. 171 Minn. 1920
1917F, 1050 , that “cities may also prescribe districts within which no business or occupation of a noxious or offensive character, or which tends to interfere with the comfort and prosperity of others, may be carried on.” In State v. Houghton, 142 Minn. 28 , , an ordinance excluding a cereal mill from what had been declared to be a residence district was sustained as being a proper exercise of the police power for the general welfare.
Roerig v. Houghton 175 N.W. 542 Minn. 1919
Roerig v. Houghton 175 N.W. 542 Minn. 1919
1917F, 1050 ; State v. Houghton, 142 Minn. 28 , .
State ex rel. Twin City Building & Investment Co. v. Houghton 174 N.W. 885 Minn. 1919
State ex rel. Twin City Building & Investment Co. v. Houghton 174 N.W. 885 Minn. 1919
The tendency noted is illustrated in State v. Houghton, 142 Minn. 28 , , where we held that the exclusion of a factory manufacturing cereal products from a restricted residence district, created pursuant to Laws 1913, pp. 102, 618, cc.