Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Twin City Building & Investment Co. v. Houghton, 174 N.W. 885.

41 citing documents.

Wegner v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Wegner v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Co. v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 1, 16 , 176 N.W.
Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of Chanhassen 342 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 1984
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency v. Hatfield 210 N.W.2d 298 Minn. 1973
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency v. Hatfield 210 N.W.2d 298 Minn. 1973
Twin City B. & I. Co. v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 1 , 144 Minn. 13, 16 , , 161 (1920): “The notion of what is public use changes from time to time.
Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of Minnetonka 162 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 1968
Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of Minnetonka 162 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 1968
& Investment Co. v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 1, 13 , , , 8 A. L. R. 585.
PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF SAINT PAUL v. Fisher 145 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1966
PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF SAINT PAUL v. Fisher 145 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1966
Twin City B. & I. Co. v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 1, 16 , , 161, 8 A. L. R. 585, applies equally to the “governmental function” concept.
Filister v. City of Minneapolis 133 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 1964
Filister v. City of Minneapolis 133 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 1964
& Investment Co. v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 1, 19 , , , 162, 8 A. L. R. 585, and in State ex rel.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ST. PAUL v. Greenman 96 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1959
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ST. PAUL v. Greenman 96 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1959
Twin City B. & I. Co. v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 1 , , , 8 A. L. R. 585.
In Re Condemnation by Dairyland Power Cooperative 82 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1957
In Re Condemnation by Dairyland Power Cooperative 82 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1957
Twin City B. & I. Co. v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 1 , , , 8 A. L. R. 585.
Western States Utilities Co. v. City of Waseca 65 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1954
Western States Utilities Co. v. City of Waseca 65 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1954
Twin City B. & I. Co. v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 1 , , , 8 A. L. R. 585; State ex rel.
Burger v. City of St. Paul 64 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1954
Burger v. City of St. Paul 64 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1954
Twin City B. & I. Co. v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 1 , , , 8 A. L. R. 585.
Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth 48 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1951
Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth 48 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1951
Twin City B. & I. Co. v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 1 , , , 8 A. L. R. 585, would appear to have settled the matter in Minnesota as far as the issues involv *238 ing eminent domain in litigation are concerned.
Oscar P. Gustafson Co. v. City of Minneapolis 42 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1950
Oscar P. Gustafson Co. v. City of Minneapolis 42 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1950
Twin City B. & I. Co. v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 1, 20 , , , 162, 8 A. L. R. 585, decided over 30 years ago, the validity of the statute which authorized cities of the first class to establish restricted residence districts was involved.
Burnquist v. Cook 19 N.W.2d 394 Minn. 1945
Blaisdell v. Home Building & Loan Ass'n 249 N.W. 334 Minn. 1933
Blaisdell v. Home Building & Loan Ass'n 249 N.W. 334 Minn. 1933
Twin City B. & I. Co. v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 1 , , , 8 A. L. R. 585; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Madsen v. Houghton 233 N.W. 831 Minn. 1930
State Ex Rel. Madsen v. Houghton 233 N.W. 831 Minn. 1930
Twin City B. & I. Co. v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 1 , , , 8 A. L. R. 585.
State Ex Rel. Olson v. Guilford 219 N.W. 770 Minn. 1928
State Ex Rel. Olson v. Guilford 219 N.W. 770 Minn. 1928
Twin City B. & I. Co. v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 1 , , , 8 A. L. R. 585.
State Ex Rel. v. Houghton 204 N.W. 569 Minn. 1925
State ex rel. Beery v. Houghton 204 N.W. 569 Minn. 1925
State Ex Rel. v. Houghton 204 N.W. 569 Minn. 1925
The case of State v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 1 , 174 N.W.
State ex rel. Beery v. Houghton 204 N.W. 569 Minn. 1925
The case of State v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 1 , , , 8 A. L. R. 585, involved the condemnation of property against its use for an apartment building under the authority of L. 1915, p. 180, c. 128.
Vacation of Part of Town of Hibbing 204 N.W. 534 Minn. 1925
In re Hull 163 Minn. 439 Minn. 1925
In re Hull 163 Minn. 439 Minn. 1925
This court struggled with the question of what is a public use in State v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 1 , , , 8 A. L. R. 585.
Vacation of Part of Town of Hibbing 204 N.W. 534 Minn. 1925
This court struggled with the question of what is a public use in State v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 1 , 174 N.W.
Sundquist v. Fraser 191 N.W. 931 Minn. 1923
Dexner v. Houghton 190 N.W. 179 Minn. 1922
Dexner v. Houghton 190 N.W. 179 Minn. 1922
Its provisions were set forth and some of them considered in State v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 1 , , , 8 A. L. R. 585, but it was not decided when a district is created within the meaning of the act.