Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Seastrand v. D. A. Foley & Co., 175 N.W. 117.
- MOAC Mall Holdings, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Serene E. Warren, as beneficiary of the 2011 Arizona NG Trust 102, 8008 Meadow Trust 102, 2011 Lafayette … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- David Carl Hepfl v. Jodine Patrice Meadowcroft 9 N.W.3d 567 Minn. 2024
- David Carl Hepfl v. Jodine Patrice Meadowcroft 9 N.W.3d 567 Minn. 2024
- Explained Paul Herlache, Minn. 2023
- Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc. 628 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 2001
- Klass v. Twin City Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n 190 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1971
-
Klass v. Twin City Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n
190 N.W.2d 493
Minn. 1971
Co. 133 Minn. 360, 363 , ; Seastrand v. D. A. Foley & Co. 144 Minn. 239, 243 , ; Restatement, Restitution, § 1.
- Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout 124 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1963
-
Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout
124 N.W.2d 328
Minn. 1963
Farm Loan Assn. 182 Minn. 115 , ; Seastrand v. D. A. Foley & Co. 144 Minn. 239 , ; Grand Lodge A.O.U.W.
- St. Paul Hospital Workers Health & Welfare, Inc. v. Bethesda Lutheran Hospital 121 N.W.2d 325 Minn. 1963
-
St. Paul Hospital Workers Health & Welfare, Inc. v. Bethesda Lutheran Hospital
121 N.W.2d 325
Minn. 1963
Seastrand v. D. A. Foley & Co. 144 Minn. 239 , ; Restatement, Judgments, § 45, comments c and d, and § 49, comments a and b.
- Roske v. Ilykanyics 45 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1951
-
Roske v. Ilykanyics
45 N.W.2d 769
Minn. 1951
The right to recover is governed by principles of equity, Seastrand v. D. A. Foley & Co. 144 Minn. 239 , , but the remedy is governed by the law, much as if an actual contract had been established.
- Twenty Associates, Inc. v. First National Bank & Trust Co. 273 N.W. 696 Minn. 1937
-
Twenty Associates, Inc. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.
273 N.W. 696
Minn. 1937
1932, 1934) § 1613; Seastrand v. D. A. Foley & Co. 144 Minn. 239 , .
- Wunder v. Wunder 244 N.W. 682 Minn. 1932
-
Wunder v. Wunder
244 N.W. 682
Minn. 1932
Seastrand v. D. A. Foley & Co. 144 Minn. 239, 243, 244 , .
- Kubat v. Zika 242 N.W. 477 Minn. 1932
-
Kubat v. Zika
242 N.W. 477
Minn. 1932
502 , ; Seastrand v. D. A. Foley Co. 144 Minn. 239 , .
- W. G. Reddingius Co. v. Enkema 194 N.W. 646 Minn. 1923
-
W. G. Reddingius Co. v. Enkema
194 N.W. 646
Minn. 1923
1918D, 241, and again in Sea-strand v. D. A. Foley & Co. 144 Minn. 239 , .
- Faltis v. Berkner 193 N.W. 457 Minn. 1923
-
Faltis v. Berkner
193 N.W. 457
Minn. 1923
Brand v. Williams, 29 Minn. 238 , Seastrand v. D. A. Foley & Co. 144 Minn. 239 , .
- Hoven v. Leedham 189 N.W. 601 Minn. 1922
-
Hoven v. Leedham
189 N.W. 601
Minn. 1922
1918D, 241; Seastrand v. D. A. Foley & Co. 144 Minn. 239 , .
- Seastrand v. D. A. Foley & Co. 187 N.W. 413 Minn. 1922
-
Seastrand v. D. A. Foley & Co.
187 N.W. 413
Minn. 1922
On a former appeal, Seastrand v. D. A. Foley & Co. 144 Minn. 239 , , it was held that such an action will lie.
- Nelson v. Rohweder 180 N.W. 223 Minn. 1920
-
Nelson v. Rohweder
180 N.W. 223
Minn. 1920
1917E, 344 ; Seastrand v. D. A. Foley & Co. 144 Minn. 239 , .