DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co., 176 N.W. 169.

30 citing documents.

  • Christy v. Saliterman 179 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1970
  • Christy v. Saliterman 179 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1970
    Schulz v. Feigal, 273 Minn. 470 , 142 N. W. (2d) 84 ; Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 145 Minn. 100 , .
  • Miller v. Raaen 139 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1966
  • Miller v. Raaen 139 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1966
    ed a grinding disc to slip and cut membranes and tissues at the base of the tongue, Ellering v. Gross, 189 Minn. 68 , ; where a dentist continued to administer gas as an anesthetic after cyanosis appeared, Harris v. Wood, 214 Minn. 492 , 8 N. W. (2d) 818 ; where ether was administered as an anesthetic after cyanosis appeared as a danger signal, Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 145 Minn. 100 , ; where X-ray burn resulted from the improper administration of X ray, Holt v. Ten Broeck, 134 Min
  • McKenzie v. Siegel 112 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1961
  • McKenzie v. Siegel 112 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1961
    Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 145 Minn. 100 , ; Moratzky v. Wirth, 74 Minn. 146 , .
  • Jensen v. Linner 108 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1961
  • Jensen v. Linner 108 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1961
    In Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 145 Minn. 100, 103 , , this court said: “Appellants insist that, since no expert witness testified that appellants did or omitted to do anything contrary to good surgery and practice, it was the duty of the court to direct a verdict in their favor.
  • Harris v. Wood 8 N.W.2d 818 Minn. 1943
  • Harris v. Wood 8 N.W.2d 818 Minn. 1943
    In speaking of the liability of a physician in such case, in Moehlen *499 brock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 145 Minn. 100, 102, 103 , , we said: “When that condition [cyanosis] appears it is a signal of warning to a physician that, if the ether is persisted in, it is dangerous, and if persisted in too much it will cause the death of the patient.
  • Johnson v. Colp 300 N.W. 791 Minn. 1941
  • Johnson v. Colp 300 N.W. 791 Minn. 1941
    A careful examination of the opinions and records in the Minnesota cases relied upon by defendant discloses that Moratzky v. Wirth, 67 Minn. 46 , Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 145 Minn. 100 , ; and Brossard v. Koop, 200 Minn. 410 , each contained testimonial or circumstantial evidence entitling plaintiff to reach the jury without the benefit of res ipsa loquitur.
  • Simon v. Larson 298 N.W. 33 Minn. 1941
  • Simon v. Larson 298 N.W. 33 Minn. 1941
    Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 145 Minn. 100 , ; Myrlie v. Hill, 58 S. D. 330, .
  • Cassidy v. McLaughlin 285 N.W. 889 Minn. 1939
  • Cassidy v. McLaughlin 285 N.W. 889 Minn. 1939
    In Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 145 Minn. 100 , , there was evidence that the doctors noticed something was wrong with the anesthetic being used in time to have averted death had they acted with due care.
  • Nelson v. Nicollet Clinic 276 N.W. 801 Minn. 1937
  • Nelson v. Nicollet Clinic 276 N.W. 801 Minn. 1937
    Quickstad v. Tavenner, 196 Minn. 125 , ; Yates v. Gamble, 198 Minn. 7 , ; Williamson v. Andrews, 198 Minn. 349 , ; Walker v. Holbrook, 130 Minn. 106 , ; Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 145 Minn. 100 , ; Nelson v. Dahl, 174 Minn. 574 , ; Harju v. Allen, 146 Minn. 23 , .
  • Taylor v. Northern States Power Co. 256 N.W. 674 Minn. 1934
  • Taylor v. Northern States Power Co. 256 N.W. 674 Minn. 1934
    145 Minn. 100 , ; Asplind v. Fred W. Pearce Corp. 175 Minn. 445 , ; Ellis v. Lindmark, 177 Minn. 390 , .
  • Bush v. Cress 233 N.W. 317 Minn. 1930
  • Bush v. Cress 233 N.W. 317 Minn. 1930
    Harju v. Allen, 146 Minn. 23 , ; Getchell v. Hill, 21 Minn. 464 ; Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 145 Minn. 100 , ; Fowler v. Scheldrup, 166 Minn. 164 , .
  • Nelson v. Dahl 219 N.W. 941 Minn. 1928
  • Nelson v. Dahl 219 N.W. 941 Minn. 1928
    Martin v. Courtney, 75 Minn. 255, 261 , ; Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 145 Minn. 100 , ; Clark v. George, 148 Minn. 52 , ; Berkholz v. Benepe, 153 Minn. 335 , .
  • Clark v. George 180 N.W. 1011 Minn. 1921
  • Clark v. George 180 N.W. 1011 Minn. 1921
    1917E, 678; Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 145 Minn. 100 , ; Harju v. Allen, 146 Minn. 23 , .
  • Harju v. Allen 177 N.W. 1015 Minn. 1920
  • Harju v. Allen 177 N.W. 1015 Minn. 1920
    1917E, 678; Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. 145 Minn. 100 , .
  • Villiott v. Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of World 177 N.W. 356 Minn. 1920
  • Villiott v. Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of World 177 N.W. 356 Minn. 1920
    Moratzky v. Wirth, 74 Minn. 146 , ; Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co. supra, page 100, .