DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Colby v. Street, 178 N.W. 599.

46 citing documents.

  • Carlson v. Cohen 223 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1974
  • Carlson v. Cohen 223 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1974
    See, also, Gallagher v. Moffet, 233 Minn. 330 , Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60 , Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , for the theory that the municipal court has no jurisdiction to afford affirmative equitable relief and that therefore the enforcement of such claims should be sought in the district court.
  • Miller v. Benner 196 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1972
  • Miller v. Benner 196 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1972
    1 See, also, Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60 , Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290
  • Gallagher v. Moffet 46 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 1951
  • Gallagher v. Moffet 46 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 1951
    See, Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , .
  • Goette v. Howe 44 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1950
  • Goette v. Howe 44 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1950
    Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , ; Newton v. Newton, 46 Minn. 33 , .
  • Downing v. Maag 10 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1943
  • Downing v. Maag 10 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1943
    812 ; Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , 178 N.W.
  • Seitz v. Sitze 10 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1943
  • Seitz v. Sitze 10 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1943
    Robertson v. Corcoran, 125 Minn. 118 , ; Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , ; Morrow v. Porter, 161 Minn. 396 , .
  • Dill v. Kucharsky 3 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1942
  • Dill v. Kucharsky 3 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1942
    Hanson v. Bowman, 199 Minn. 70 , ; Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , ; Morrow v. Porter, 161 Minn. 396 , , and cases cited.
  • Hanson v. Bowman 271 N.W. 127 Minn. 1937
  • Hanson v. Bowman 271 N.W. 127 Minn. 1937
    Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , ; Morrow v. Porter, 161 Minn. 396 , ; Olsen v. Dixon, 165 Minn. 124 , .” The services are not like those in Simonson v. Moseley, 183 Minn. 525 , , where there was no finding that the services rendered were not such as could be compensated in money.
  • Anderson v. Anderson 266 N.W. 841 Minn. 1936
  • Anderson v. Anderson 266 N.W. 841 Minn. 1936
    That specific performance of an agreement, either written or oral, of the nature of the one here found to have been made may be decreed by the district court Avas held in Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , ; Simonson v. Moseley, 183 Minn. 525 , ; *259 Smithers v. Bell, 183 Minn. 608 , .
  • Koch v. Koch 264 N.W. 791 Minn. 1936
  • Koch v. Koch 264 N.W. 791 Minn. 1936
    Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , .
  • Happel v. Happel 238 N.W. 783 Minn. 1931
  • Happel v. Happel 238 N.W. 783 Minn. 1931
    Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , ; Morrow v. Porter, 161 Minn. 396 , ; Olsen v. Dixon, 165 Minn. 124 , .
  • Reichert v. Pure Oil Co. 214 N.W. 669 Minn. 1927
  • Reichert v. Pure Oil Co. 214 N.W. 669 Minn. 1927
    Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , .
  • Colby v. Street 209 N.W. 537 Minn. 1926
  • Colby v. Street 209 N.W. 537 Minn. 1926
    Lees, C. The nature of the litigation, of which this appeal is the final chapter, is disclosed by Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , , 151 Minn. 25 , , and 155 Minn. 157 , .
  • Sieger v. Sieger 202 N.W. 742 Minn. 1925
  • Sieger v. Sieger 202 N.W. 742 Minn. 1925
    27, note 88; Nester v. Gross, 66 Minn. 371 , ; Merritt v. Joyce, 117 Minn. 235 , ; Twohy M. Co. v. Melbye, 78 Minn. 357 , ; Arnold v. Smith, 121 Minn. 116 , ; Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290, 296 , .
  • Morrow v. Porter 202 N.W. 53 Minn. 1925
  • Morrow v. Porter 202 N.W. 53 Minn. 1925
    Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , , and cases cited; Odenbreit v. Utheim, 131 Minn. 56 , , L. R. A. 1916D, 421; Robertson v. Corcoran, 125 Minn. 118 , ; Brasch v. Reeves, 124 Minn. 114 , ; Haubrich v. Haubrich, 118 Minn. 394 , .
  • O'Brien v. Lien 199 N.W. 914 Minn. 1924
  • O'Brien v. Lien 199 N.W. 914 Minn. 1924
    In Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , , we held that a contract for the conveyance of real estate in consideration of the plaintiff living with and caring for decedent was enforceable in district court, and it was said: “If the contract is one which may be specifically enforced, we think an action to enforce it may properly be brought in t
  • Smith v. Erlandson 199 N.W. 927 Minn. 1924
  • Smith v. Erlandson 199 N.W. 927 Minn. 1924
    609; Haubrich v. Haubrich, 118 Minn. 394 , ; Robertson v. Corcoran, 125 Minn. 118 , ; Kins v. Ginzky, 135 Minn. 327 , ; Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , ; Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , .
  • Higgins v. Lamoreaux 198 N.W. 408 Minn. 1924
  • Higgins v. Lamoreaux 198 N.W. 408 Minn. 1924
    Co. 115 Minn. 434 , , L. R. A. 1918A, 3; Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , .
  • Wade v. Citizens State Bank 197 N.W. 277 Minn. 1924
  • Wade v. Citizens State Bank 197 N.W. 277 Minn. 1924
    Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , .
  • Gray v. Hoover Grain Co. 190 N.W. 794 Minn. 1922
  • Gray v. Hoover Grain Co. 190 N.W. 794 Minn. 1922
    § 7724 and 1916 Supp.; Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , ; Fish v. Berkey, 10 Minn. 161 (199); Fairmont Cement Stone Mnfg.
  • In re the Estate of Alms 190 N.W. 253 Minn. 1922
  • In re the Estate of Alms 190 N.W. 253 Minn. 1922
    Peavey v. Wells, 136 Minn. 180 , ; C. S. Brackett Co. v. Lofgren, 140 Minn. 52 , , L. R. A. 1918F, 998; Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , ; Kauffman v. Kauffman, 137 Minn. 457 , .
  • William Weisman Holding Co. v. Miller 188 N.W. 732 Minn. 1922
  • William Weisman Holding Co. v. Miller 188 N.W. 732 Minn. 1922
    A plea in abatement, “is not good where the nature of the two actions is essentially different though they relate to the same subject matter.” Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , ; Piper v. Sawyer, 82 Minn. 474 , ; Mathews v. Hennepin County Sav.
  • Colby v. Street 185 N.W. 954 Minn. 1921
  • Colby v. Street 185 N.W. 954 Minn. 1921
    Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , .