Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Koivisto v. Bankers & Merchants Fire Insurance, 181 N.W. 580.

39 citing documents.

State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co., 181 N.W. 580, 582 (Minn. 1921)).
Pesina Ex Rel. Pesina v. Juarez 181 N.W.2d 109 Minn. 1970
Pesina Ex Rel. Pesina v. Juarez 181 N.W.2d 109 Minn. 1970
Co. 148 Minn. 255, 259 , , where we said, with respect to an oral agreement fixing the effective date of a policy: “ * * The contract Mattson made with plaintiff was directly connected with and essential to the transaction of the business in hand.
Dukeman v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Company 174 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1970
Dukeman v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Company 174 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1970
Co. 148 Minn. 255 , , 17 Minn. L. Rev. 572 ; Nehring v. Bast, 258 Minn. 193 , 103 N. W. (2d) 368 , 85 A. L. R. (2d) 1400.
Morrison v. Swenson 142 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1966
Morrison v. Swenson 142 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1966
Co. 148 Minn. 255, 259 , , where we said, with respect to an oral agreement fixing the effective date of a policy: “* * * The contract Mattson made with plaintiff was directly connected with and essential to the transaction of the business in hand.
Humenik v. Siwek 124 N.W.2d 191 Minn. 1963
Humenik v. Siwek 124 N.W.2d 191 Minn. 1963
Lindstrom v. Minnesota Liquid Fertilizer Co. 119 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1963
Lindstrom v. Minnesota Liquid Fertilizer Co. 119 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1963
Co. 148 Minn. 255 , 181 N. *497 W. 580; Watts v. Howard, 70 Minn. 122 , ; see, Rausch, v. Aronson, 211 Minn. 272 , 1 N. W. (2d) 371 .
Nehring v. Bast 103 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1960
Nehring v. Bast 103 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1960
Co. 148 Minn. 255, 258 , , Mr. Justice Lees emphasized that the public at large is not bound by the restrictions contained in an agency contract and noted that: “We may not close our eyes to the fact that the local agent of an insurance company is the medium through whom the business of making insurance contracts is
Gulbrandson v. EMPIRE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. 87 N.W.2d 850 Minn. 1958
Gulbrandson v. EMPIRE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. 87 N.W.2d 850 Minn. 1958
Co. 148 Minn. 255 , ; Rommel v. New Brunswick Fire Ins.
Johnson v. Ostenso Ex Rel. Ostenso 84 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1957
Johnson v. Ostenso Ex Rel. Ostenso 84 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1957
Co. 148 Minn. 255, 260 , .
Boehne v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America 28 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1947
Boehne v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America 28 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1947
Rommel v. New Brunswick Fire Insurance Co. 8 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1943
Rommel v. New Brunswick Fire Insurance Co. 8 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1943
Co. 148 Minn. 255 , , furnishes an adequate solution.
Rein v. New York Life Insurance Co. 299 N.W. 385 Minn. 1941
Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. D. A. Swanstrom Co. 279 N.W. 845 Minn. 1938
Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. D. A. Swanstrom Co. 279 N.W. 845 Minn. 1938
Co. 148 Minn. 255 , ; Nertney v. National F. Ins.
Schmidt v. Agricultural Insurance 252 N.W. 671 Minn. 1934
Schmidt v. Agricultural Ins. Co. 252 N.W. 671 Minn. 1934
Schmidt v. Agricultural Insurance 252 N.W. 671 Minn. 1934
Co. 148 Minn. 255 , ; Quinn-Shepherdson Co. v. U. S. F. & G. Co. 142 Minn. 428 , ; Ganser v. Fireman’s Fund Ins.
National Radiator Corp. v. Shea 234 N.W. 648 Minn. 1931
National Radiator Corp. v. Shea 234 N.W. 648 Minn. 1931
Union Central Life Insurance v. Star Insurance Co. of America 227 N.W. 850 Minn. 1929
Union Central Life Insurance v. Star Insurance Co. of America 227 N.W. 850 Minn. 1929
Co. 148 Minn. 255 , , which is sufficiently distinguished from the case at bar by the single statement that in that case the agent took the plaintiff’s application, received and receipted for the premium, and stated to the plaintiff that the insurance then went into effect; these statements were believed and relied upon b
Cauger v. Gray Motor Co. 217 N.W. 347 Minn. 1928
Cauger v. Gray Motor Co. 217 N.W. 347 Minn. 1928
Olson v. American Central Life Insurance 216 N.W. 225 Minn. 1927
Olson v. American Central Life Insurance 216 N.W. 225 Minn. 1927
Co. 148 Minn. 255 , , in support of the claim that the insurance took effect on the date of the application.
Eberlein v. Stockyards Mortgage & Trust Co. 204 N.W. 961 Minn. 1925
Eberlein v. Stockyards Mortgage & Trust Co. 204 N.W. 961 Minn. 1925
James B. Clow & Sons v. A. W. Scott Co. 203 N.W. 410 Minn. 1925
James B. Clow & Sons v. A. W. Scott Co. 203 N.W. 410 Minn. 1925