Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite McNamee v. Hines, 184 N.W. 675.

30 citing documents.

Muckler v. Buchl 150 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1967
Muckler v. Buchl 150 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1967
Co. 124 Minn. 487 , ; McNamee v. Hines, 150 Minn. 97 , ; Alling v. Northwestern Bell Tel.
Hagsten v. Simberg 44 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 1950
Hagsten v. Simberg 44 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 1950
Lewis v. Chicago G. W. R. Co. 124 Minn. 487 , ; and cases cited.” See, also, McNamee v. Hines, 150 Minn. 97 , .
Christensen v. Northern States Power of Wisconsin 25 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 1946
Christensen v. Northern States Power of Wisconsin 25 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 1946
McNamee v. Hines, 150 Minn. 97, 102 , , where the court quoted with approval the following language: “The burden of proof is upon the plaintiff to prove that some negligent act of defendant caused the death of deceased.
Smock v. Mankato Elks Club 280 N.W. 851 Minn. 1938
Smock v. Mankato Elks Club 280 N.W. 851 Minn. 1938
Co. 138 Minn. 278 , ; Lares v. C. B. & Q. R. Co. 144 Minn. 170 , ; Skillings v. Allen, 148 Minn. 88 , ; McNamee v. Hines, 150 Minn. 97 , ; MacIntosh v. G. N. Ry.
Benson v. Northland Transportation Co. 274 N.W. 532 Minn. 1937
Benson v. Northland Transportation Co. 274 N.W. 532 Minn. 1937
Defendant contends that a neAV trial should have been granted because plaintiff failed to establish the manner in which the accident occurred, claiming that her evidence was in equilibrio, citing Swenson v. Erlandson, 86 Minn. 263 , ; McNamee v. Hines, 150 Minn. 97 , ; Ailing v. N. W. Bell Tel.
Nolan v. Newfert 229 N.W. 97 Minn. 1930
Nolan v. Newfert 229 N.W. 97 Minn. 1930
On this feature of the case McNamee v. Hines, 150 Minn. 97 , ; Nealis v. C. R. I. & P. Ry.
Robertson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. 225 N.W. 160 Minn. 1929
Robertson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. 225 N.W. 160 Minn. 1929
Co. 173 Minn. 587 , ; McNamee v. Hines, 150 Minn. 97 , ; MacIntosh v. G. N. Ry.
Nealis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. 218 N.W. 125 Minn. 1928
Nealis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. 218 N.W. 125 Minn. 1928
McNamee v. Hines, 150 Minn. 97 , , and cases therein cited; Bruckman v. C. St.
Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 215 N.W. 678 Minn. 1927
Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 215 N.W. 678 Minn. 1927
McNamee v. Hines, 150 Minn. 97, 102 , .
Schendel v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 206 N.W. 436 Minn. 1925
Schendel v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 206 N.W. 436 Minn. 1925
The rule has been recently stated by this court, and the authorities are cited in McNamee v. Hines, 150 Minn. 97 , , and need not be repeated here.
Breen v. Hines 202 N.W. 726 Minn. 1925
Breen v. Hines 202 N.W. 726 Minn. 1925
L. R. Co. 159 Minn. 70 , , and McNamee v. Hines, 150 Minn. 97 , , and the cases there cited.
McCann v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 198 N.W. 300 Minn. 1924
McCann v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 198 N.W. 300 Minn. 1924
Co. 107 Minn. 242 , , 26 L. R. A. (N. S.) 600; McNamee v. Hines, 150 Minn. 97 , .
Ardell v. Great Northern Railway Co. 189 N.W. 939 Minn. 1922
Ardell v. Great Northern Railway Co. 189 N.W. 939 Minn. 1922
McNamee v. Hines, 150 Minn. 97 , , and cases there cited.
MacIntosh v. Great Northern Railway Co. 188 N.W. 551 Minn. 1922
MacIntosh v. Great Northern Railway Co. 188 N.W. 551 Minn. 1922
In McNamee v. Hines, 150 Minn. 97 , , where it was held that a causal connection between the negligence alleged and the injuries suffered was not shown, a number of cases are collected.
Outcelt v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad 185 N.W. 495 Minn. 1921
Outcelt v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad 185 N.W. 495 Minn. 1921
McNamee v. Hines, supra, page 97, ; 2 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.