Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Clark, 182 N.W. 452.

25 citing documents.

Minn. 2023
(holding that possession of a firearm by an ineligible person is a continuing offense); (holding that “concealing or possessing stolen goods” is a continuing offense); (holding that “[e]scape is a continuing offense”); (holding that the unlawful failure to support dependent children is a continuing offense).
State v. Washington 908 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 2018
State v. Washington 908 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 2018
ate v. Banks , , 494 (Minn. 1983) (holding that possession of a firearm by an ineligible person is a continuing offense); State v. Lawrence , , 253 (Minn. 1981) (holding that "concealing or possessing stolen goods" is a continuing offense); State v. Burnett , 292 Minn. 484 , , 189 (1972) (holding that "escape is a continuing offense"); State v. Clark , 148 Minn. 389 , 182 N.W.
Petition of MG 375 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Petition of MG 375 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
at 505 , d at 713 (quoting State v. Clark, 148 Minn. 389, 391 , 182 N.W.
Mad v. Pr 277 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1979
M. A. D. v. P. R. 277 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1979
M. A. D. v. P. R. 277 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1979
812 ; State v. Clark, 148 Minn. 389 , 182 N.W.
Mad v. Pr 277 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1979
812 ; State v. Clark, 148 Minn. 389 , 182 N.W.
Hennepin County Welfare Department v. Staat 178 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1970
Hennepin County Welfare Department v. Staat 178 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1970
Thus, in State v. Clark, 148 Minn. 389, 391 , , we stated: “We think there is an abandonment when the desertion is accompanied by an intention to entirely forsake the child.
State Ex Rel. Sargent v. Tahash 160 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1968
State Ex Rel. Sargent v. Tahash 160 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1968
In State v. Clark, 148 Minn. 389 , , we recognized that the crime of child abandonment or desertion is a continuing offense.
State v. Townsend 108 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1961
State v. Townsend 108 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1961
As to the element of intentional abandonment Mr. Commissioner Lees, in State v. Clark, 148 Minn. 389 , , stated that there might be some uncertainty as to the meaning of the statute and that possibly a father who has been convicted of wholly abandoning his child may not be prosecuted a second time on a similar charge unless he had resumed the performance of his parental obligations and had thereafter re
In Re Guardianship of Kowalke 46 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1950
In Re Guardianship of Kowalke 46 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1950
617.55; State v. Clark, 148 Minn. 389 , 182 N.W.
State v. Johnson 13 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1944
State v. Johnson 13 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1944
Krueger v. Krueger, 210 Minn. 144 , ; State v. Ford, 151 Minn. 382 , ; State v. Clark; 148 Minn. 389 , .
State v. Sweet 228 N.W. 337 Minn. 1929
State v. Sweet 228 N.W. 337 Minn. 1929
State v. Clark, 148 Minn. 389 , ; State v. Wood, 168 Minn. 34 , .
State v. Wood 209 N.W. 529 Minn. 1926
State v. Wood 209 N.W. 529 Minn. 1926
State v. Clark, 148 Minn. 389 , ; State v. Ford, 151 Minn. 382 , ; State v. Morgan, 155 Iowa, 482 , , 40 L. R. A. (N. S.) 615.
City of Duluth v. Nordin 208 N.W. 189 Minn. 1926
City of Duluth v. Nordin 208 N.W. 189 Minn. 1926
G. S. 1923, § 10644; State v. Clark, 148 Minn. 389 , .