Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hollister v. Hines, 184 N.W. 856.

30 citing documents.

Perkins v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. 289 N.W.2d 462 Minn. 1979
Perkins v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. 289 N.W.2d 462 Minn. 1979
The extrahazardous doctrine was first enunciated in Hollister v. Hines, 150 Minn. 185 , 184 N.W.
Burdick v. Bongard 96 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1959
Burdick v. Bongard 96 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1959
14 Olson v. Kennedy Trading Co. 199 Minn. 493 , ; Kokesh v. Price, 136 Minn. 304 , , 23 A. L. R. 643; Hollister v. Hines, 150 Minn. 185 , ; Truso v. Ehnert, 177 Minn. 249 , ; Prosser, Torts (2 ed.) § 65, p. 365; 13 Dunnell, Dig.
Jorgenson v. M. ST. P. & SSM RY. CO. 231 Minn. 121 Minn. 1950
Jorgenson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 42 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1950
Jorgenson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 42 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1950
Co. 179 Minn. 480 , ; Hollister v. Hines, 150 Minn. 185 , ; Lawson v. M. St.
Jorgenson v. M. ST. P. & SSM RY. CO. 231 Minn. 121 Minn. 1950
797 ; Hollister v. Hines, 150 Minn. 185 , 184 N.W.
Blaske v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 37 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1949
Blaske v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 37 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1949
Co. 187 Minn. 263 , ; Hollister v. Hines, 150 Minn. 185 , ; Massmann v. G. N. Ry.
Doll v. Scandrett 276 N.W. 281 Minn. 1937
Doll v. Scandrett 276 N.W. 281 Minn. 1937
616 ; Hollister v. Hines, 150 Minn. 185 , 184 N.W.
Olson v. Kennedy Trading Co. 272 N.W. 381 Minn. 1937
Olson v. Kennedy Trading Co. 272 N.W. 381 Minn. 1937
Co. 82 Minn. 120 , ; Hollister v. Hines, 150 Minn. 185 , ; Brubaker v. Iowa County, 174 Wis.
O'Connor v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 251 N.W. 674 Minn. 1933
O'Connor v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 251 N.W. 674 Minn. 1933
Hollister v. Hines, 150 Minn. 185 , .
Martin v. Schiska 236 N.W. 312 Minn. 1931
Martin v. Schiska 236 N.W. 312 Minn. 1931
Kokesh v. Price, 136 Minn. 304 , 161 H. W. 715, 23 A. L. R. 643; Hollister v. Hines, 150 Minn. 185 , .
Central States Investment Co. v. Boettcher 230 N.W. 120 Minn. 1930
Central States Investment Co. v. Boettcher 230 N.W. 120 Minn. 1930
Reed v. Lammel, 40 Minn. 397 , ; Hollister v. Hines, 150 Minn. 185 , ; 5 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
Franklin v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 229 N.W. 797 Minn. 1930
Franklin v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 229 N.W. 797 Minn. 1930
Plachetko v. C. B. & Q. R. Co. 139 Minn. 278 , ; Hollister v. Hines, 150 Minn. 185 , ; Lawson v. M. St.
Asklund v. Chicago Great Western Railroad 223 N.W. 95 Minn. 1929
Asklund v. Chicago Great Western Railroad 223 N.W. 95 Minn. 1929
Co. 139 Minn. 288 , ; Hollister v. Hines, 150 Minn. 185 , ; Hinkle v. M. A. & C. R. Ry.
Lawson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 219 N.W. 554 Minn. 1928
Lawson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 219 N.W. 554 Minn. 1928
Hollister v. Hines, 150 Minn. 185 , , and the cases there cited; and see Perkins v. C. M. & St.
Lundh v. Great Northern Railway Co. 206 N.W. 43 Minn. 1925
Lundh v. Great Northern Railway Co. 206 N.W. 43 Minn. 1925
Co. 144 Minn. 309 , ; Hollister v. Hines, 150 Minn. 185 , ; Moody v. C. N. Ry.
Perkins v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 197 N.W. 758 Minn. 1924
Perkins v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 197 N.W. 758 Minn. 1924
Hollister v. Hines, 150 Minn. 185 , ; Zenner v. Great Northern Ry.