Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Albrecht v. Rathai, 185 N.W. 259.

30 citing documents.

Annis v. Annis 84 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 1957
Annis v. Annis 84 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 1957
15 See, Albrecht v. Rathai, 150 Minn. 256 , ; State v. Horr, 163 Minn. 141, 148, 149 , ; Terzian v. Carlson, 176 Minn. 219 , ; McCormick, Evidence, § 164; 2 Wigmore, Evidence (3 ed.) § 304.
Grocers, Inc. v. Horstman 46 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1951
Grocers, Inc. v. Horstman 46 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1951
& Supp. §§ 879, 952a; McWethy v. Norby, 143 Minn. 386 , ; State Bank v. Missia, 144 Minn. 410 , ; Albrecht v. Rathai, 150 Minn. 256 , ; St.
Keough v. St. Paul Milk Co. 285 N.W. 809 Minn. 1939
Keough v. St. Paul Milk Co. 285 N.W. 809 Minn. 1939
Albrecht v. Rathai, 150 Minn. 256 , 185 N.W.
M & M Securities Co. v. Dirnberger 250 N.W. 801 Minn. 1933
M & M Securities Co. v. Dirnberger 250 N.W. 801 Minn. 1933
913 ; Albrecht v. Rathai, 150 Minn. 256 , 185 N.W.
Wismo Company v. Martin 244 N.W. 76 Minn. 1932
Wismo Company v. Martin 244 N.W. 76 Minn. 1932
In this connection we cite the following cases without analyzing or discussing them: Simerman v. Habisch, 178 Minn. 15 , ; Simerman v. Hackenkamp, 178 Minn. 19 , ; Manahan v. Puttbrese, 169 Minn. 98 , ; Farm M. & L. Co. v. Pederson, 164 Minn. 425 , ; Albrecht v. Rathai, 150 Minn. 256 , ; Owosso Sugar Co. v. Drong, 163 Minn. 216 , ; Hinkley v. Freick, 112 Minn. 239 , ; Sibley County Bank v. Schaus, 104 Minn. 438 , ; Stevens v. Pearson, 138 Minn. 72 , ; Johnson County Sav.
State v. Sweeney 231 N.W. 225 Minn. 1930
State v. Sweeney 231 N.W. 225 Minn. 1930
Albrecht v. Rathai, 150 Minn. 256 , ; State v. Horr, 163 Minn. 141, 148-149 , ; Schmitt v. U. S. F. & G. Co. 169 Minn. 106 , ; Terzian v. Carlson, 176 Minn. 219 , .
Simerman v. Habisch 225 N.W. 913 Minn. 1929
Simerman v. Habisch 225 N.W. 913 Minn. 1929
Hinckley v. Freick, 112 Minn. 239 , ; Albrecht v. Rathai, 150 Minn. 256 , .
Terzian v. Carlson 222 N.W. 921 Minn. 1929
Terzian v. Carlson 222 N.W. 921 Minn. 1929
See also Hinkley v. Freick, 112 Minn. 239, 243 , , where it is said: “Fraud opens wide the door for all fairly relevant evidence including evidence as to similar but unconnected facts in order to show systematically fraudulent intention on the part of the party sought to be charged.” Albrecht v. Rathai, 150 Minn. 256 , , applies the same rule and cites numerous authorities, including some criminal cases in this state where evidence was received upon the same principle.
State v. Kiewel 217 N.W. 598 Minn. 1928
State v. Kiewel 217 N.W. 598 Minn. 1928
State v. Wilson, 72 Minn. 522 , ; State v. Monroe, 142 Minn. 394 , ; State v. Ettenberg, 145 Minn. 39 , ; State v. Friedman, 146 Minn. 373 , ; Albrecht v. Rathai, 150 Minn. 256 , ; State v. Hacker, 153 Minn. 538 , ; State v. Rosenberg, 155 Minn. 37 , ; State v. Horr, 163 Minn. 141, 148 , ; State v. Sabatini, 171 Minn. 137 , ; State v. Holmes, 65 Minn. 230 , ; 16 C. J. 586, 589.
Schmitt v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 210 N.W. 846 Minn. 1926
Schmitt v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 210 N.W. 846 Minn. 1926
In Albrecht v. Bathai, 150 Minn. 256 , , the court gave careful consideration to the question whether proof of other similar fraudulent acts is receivable to show an intent or design to defraud.
Farm Mortgage & Loan Co. v. Pederson 205 N.W. 286 Minn. 1925
Farm Mortgage & Loan Co. v. Pederson 205 N.W. 286 Minn. 1925
Albrecht v. Rathai, 150 Minn. 256 , .
Owosso Sugar Co. v. Drong 203 N.W. 610 Minn. 1925
Owosso Sugar Co. v. Drong 203 N.W. 610 Minn. 1925
A late case under the statute is Albrecht v. Rathai, 150 Minn. 256 , , where some of the cases are noted.
State v. Horr 203 N.W. 979 Minn. 1925
State v. Horr 203 N.W. 979 Minn. 1925
940 ; Albrecht v. Rathai, 150 Minn. 256 , 185 N.W.
Merchants State Bank v. Umlauf 199 N.W. 819 Minn. 1924
Merchants State Bank v. Umlauf 199 N.W. 819 Minn. 1924
Albrecht v. Rathai, 150 Minn. 256 , .
Henning v. Carlson 186 N.W. 799 Minn. 1922
Henning v. Carlson 186 N.W. 799 Minn. 1922
Bank of Phillips v. Denfeld, 143 Minn. 281 , ; McWethy v. Norby, 143 Minn. 386 , ; State Bank of Rogers v. Missia, 144 Minn. 410 , ; *421 Albrecht v. Rathai, 150 Minn. 256 , .