Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wall v. Borgen, 188 N.W. 159.

26 citing documents.

Fichtner v. Schiller 135 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1965
Fichtner v. Schiller 135 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1965
In distinguishing the Fairley case we said in Wall v. Borgen, 152 Minn. 106, 109 , , 160: “* * * For the reason that the method of enforcing collection of the tax was drastic; that no adequate or satisfactory legal remedy was available; and that an equitable action would avoid loading the courts with a multiplicity of suits, it was held that one or more of the persons aggrieved
Adelman v. Onischuk 135 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1965
Adelman v. Onischuk 135 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1965
We said in Rosso v. Village of Brooklyn Center, 214 Minn. 364, 368 , 8 N. W. (2d) 219 , 221: “* * * It has been held by this court on numerous occasions that a taxpayer may not maintain a suit in equity to enjoin the collection of a tax or an assessment when he has an adequate remedy at law available to contest the proceeding or the collection of the tax or the assessment.” See, Wall v. Borgen, 152 Minn. 106, 108 , ; Schultz v. City of North Mankato, 176 Minn. 76 , .
Land O' Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of Sebeka 31 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1948
Land O' Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of Sebeka 31 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1948
Wall v. Borgen, 152 Minn. 106 , 188 N.W.
Rosso v. Village of Brooklyn Center 8 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1943
Rosso v. Village of Brooklyn Center 8 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1943
This principle is set forth in Wall v. Borgen, 152 Minn. 106, 108 , , as follows: “It has been consistently held that the property owner is given an adequate, speedy, simple and inexpensive remedy against any illegal or wrongful tax in the tax proceeding itself, and that he must seek his remedy in that proceeding and cannot maintain a suit in equity to enjoin
In Re Petitions for Cancellation of Ditch Assessments 5 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 1942
In re Slaughter 5 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 1942
In re Slaughter 5 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 1942
See Slingerland v. Conn, 113 Minn. 214 , ; In re Delinquent Taxes for 1921, Aitkin County, 175 Minn. 206 , ; Wall v. Borgen, 152 Minn. 106 , .
In Re Petitions for Cancellation of Ditch Assessments 5 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 1942
608 ; Wall v. Borgen, 152 Minn. 106 , 188 N.W.
Sloan v. City of Duluth 259 N.W. 393 Minn. 1935
Sloan v. City of Duluth 259 N.W. 393 Minn. 1935
1918D, 241; Wall v. Borgen, 152 Minn. 106 , ; Braddock I. Min.
Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Borgen 245 N.W. 615 Minn. 1932
Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Borgen 245 N.W. 615 Minn. 1932
Wall v. Borgen, 152 Minn. 106 , ; Braddock I. Min.
Schultz v. City of North Mankato 222 N.W. 518 Minn. 1928
Schultz v. City of North Mankato 222 N.W. 518 Minn. 1928
Brown v. City of Red Wing, 134 Minn. 204 , ; Wall v. Borgen, 152 Minn. 106 , ; County of Rock v. McDowell, 157 Minn. 296 , .
Minnehaha Parkway v. City of Minneapolis 208 N.W. 998 Minn. 1926
State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. Canfield 208 N.W. 181 Minn. 1926
State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. Canfield 208 N.W. 181 Minn. 1926
A reading of Wall v. Borgen, 152 Minn. 106 , , which was a proceeding by injunction, sufficiently indicates tbe impropriety of an extraordinary remedy here.
County of Rock v. McDowell 196 N.W. 178 Minn. 1923
County of Rock v. McDowell 196 N.W. 178 Minn. 1923
v. City of Red Wing, 134 Minn. 204 , ; Re Delinquent Taxes in Polk County, 147 Minn. 344 , ; Wall v. Borgen, 152 Minn. 106 , ; and the cases cited in above cases.
In re the Proceeding's to Obtain Judgment for Delinquent Real Estate Taxes for the Year 1920 193 N.W. 459 Minn. 1923
Braddock Iron Mining Co. v. Erskine 192 N.W. 193 Minn. 1923
Braddock Iron Mining Co. v. Erskine 192 N.W. 193 Minn. 1923
This court has recently held in Wall v. Borgen, 152 Minn. 106 , , that, where a tax can be enforced only in the manner and by the procedure provided by the general tax laws, those laws afford an adequate, remedy, if the tax be illegal because of invalidity o'f the law authorizing it, and a suit in equity to enjoin the levy of the tax cannot be maintained.