Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Klessig v. Lea, 189 N.W. 424.

32 citing documents.

In Re Estate of Beecham 378 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1985
In Re Estate of Beecham 378 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1985
See, e.g., In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , 189 N.W.
In Re Estate of Tilghman 61 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1953
In Re Estate of Tilghman 61 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1953
815 , this court made the following comment after referring to the general rule set out in In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , 189 N.W.
Caskey v. Lewandowski 46 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1951
Caskey v. Lewandowski 46 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1951
6 See, also, Shaughnessy v. Shaughnessy, 135 Minn. 262 , ; In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , ; Allen v. Peterson, 192 Minn. 459 , ; Cloutier v. Charest, 208 Minn. 453 , .
Docken v. Ryan 6 N.W.2d 98 Minn. 1942
In Re Estate of Edward Hirt 6 N.W.2d 98 Minn. 1942
Docken v. Ryan 6 N.W.2d 98 Minn. 1942
1914B, 381; Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , ; In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , ; In re Estate of Anderson, 199 Minn. 588 , .
In Re Estate of Edward Hirt 6 N.W.2d 98 Minn. 1942
941 ; In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , 189 N.W.
In re Estate of Anderson 273 N.W. 89 Minn. 1937
In re Estate of Anderson 273 N.W. 89 Minn. 1937
In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , ; In re Estate of Johnson, 170 Minn. 451 , .
Hage v. Crookston Trust Co. 272 N.W. 777 Minn. 1937
Hage v. Crookston Trust Co. 272 N.W. 777 Minn. 1937
1917C, 1015; Wagner v. Seaberg, 138 Minn. 37 , ; In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , ; Larson v. Larson, 161 Minn. 289 , ; In re Estate of Havenmaier, 163 Minn. 218 , ; In re Estate of Johnson, 170 Minn. 451 , .
Hanefeld v. Fairbrother 254 N.W. 821 Minn. 1934
Hanefeld v. Fairbrother 254 N.W. 821 Minn. 1934
See In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , ; Carlson v. Krantz, 172 Minn. 242 , , 54 A. L. R. 545.
First National Bank v. Fox 254 N.W. 8 Minn. 1934
First National Bank v. Fox 254 N.W. 8 Minn. 1934
Co. 152 Minn. 445 , ; In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , ; Hannan v. M. St.
Smith v. Hansen 219 N.W. 151 Minn. 1928
Smith v. Hansen 219 N.W. 151 Minn. 1928
As supporting the contention of error appellant cites Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , ; Wagner v. Seaberg, 138 Minn. 37 , ; Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , ; In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , .
Street v. Rosebrock 217 N.W. 939 Minn. 1928
Street v. Rosebrock 217 N.W. 939 Minn. 1928
In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , ; Hannan v. M. St.
Opperud v. Byram 217 N.W. 379 Minn. 1928
Opperud v. Byram 217 N.W. 379 Minn. 1928
Co. 139 Minn. 288 , ; Schmidt v. Capital Candy Co. 139 Minn. 378 , ; In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , ; Beaton v. D. W. & P. Ry.
Neutgens v. Rehmann 212 N.W. 943 Minn. 1927
Neutgens v. Rehmann 212 N.W. 943 Minn. 1927
1917C, 1015; Wagner v. Seaberg, 138 Minn. 37 , ; Lansing v. Gregory, 128 Minn. 496 , ; In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , ; Larson v. Larson, 161 Minn. 289 , ; In re Estate of Havenmaier, 163 Minn. 218 , ; In re Estate of Johnson, supra, page 451.
In Re Estate of Johnson 212 N.W. 815 Minn. 1927
In Re Estate of Johnson 212 N.W. 815 Minn. 1927
The *453 presumption that the services are gratuitously rendered by a child, so long as it remains in the parental home a partaker of its benefits and comforts, may be overcome by facts and circumstances from which an implied promise to compensate may be inferred.” In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , ; In re Estate of Havenmaier, 163 Minn. 218 , .
Estate of Havenmaier v. Rengstorf 203 N.W. 958 Minn. 1925
Estate of Havenmaier v. Rengstorf 203 N.W. 958 Minn. 1925
On the controlling point, In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , , was very different, for the record there was “absolutely barren” of proof of the contract necessary to.a recovery.
Klessig v. Lea 196 N.W. 655 Minn. 1924
Klessig v. Lea 196 N.W. 655 Minn. 1924
In re Estate of Klessig, 158 Minn. 27 , .