Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Eberhart v. Eberhart, 189 N.W. 592.

51 citing documents.

Distinguished In re the Matter of: Bamidele Adetifa, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State Ex Rel. Southwell v. Chamberland 361 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1985
State Ex Rel. Southwell v. Chamberland 361 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1985
203 (1937); Eberhart v. Eberhart, 153 Minn. 66 , 189 N.W.
State on Behalf of McDonnell v. McCutcheon 337 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1983
State on Behalf of McDonnell v. McCutcheon 337 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1983
Although earlier Minnesota cases held that no child support was payable during such times as custodial parents had wrongfully removed the children from the state, see, e.g., Hasse v. Hasse, 232 Minn. 234, 237 , Eberhart v. Eberhart, 153 Minn. 66, 68 , 189 N.W.
Ryan v. Ryan 219 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 1974
Ryan v. Ryan 219 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 1974
Eberhart v. Eberhart, 153 Minn. 66 , Fjeld v. Fjeld, 201 Minn. 512 , Anderson v. Anderson, 207 Minn. 338 , Hasse v. Hasse, 232 Minn. 234 , State of Illinois ex rel.
Smith v. Smith 163 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 1968
Smith v. Smith 163 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 1968
This rationale seems to be the underlying theoretical basis for the well-established and oft-cited Minnesota rule first promulgated in Eberhart v. Eberhart, 153 Minn. 66 , , that, absent unusual circumstances, where a mother by wrongful or malicious conduct deprives the father of visitation rights or where she removes the child to another state and does not inform the father of the removal or the whereabouts *194 of the child, the father is relieved of the obligation to
Fish v. Fish 159 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1968
Fish v. Fish 159 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1968
Eberhart v. Eberhart, 153 Minn. 66 , ; State of Illinois ex rel.
Curry v. Felix 149 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1967
Curry v. Felix 149 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1967
See, Eberhart v. Eberhart, 153 Minn. 66 , ; Anderson v. Anderson, 207 Minn. 338 , ; Iverson v. Iverson, 243 Minn. 54 , 66 N. W. (2d) 549 ; Hasse v. Hasse, 232 Minn. 234 , 45 N. W. (2d) 383 .
Town of Burnsville v. City of Bloomington 128 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1964
Town of Burnsville v. City of Bloomington 128 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1964
Hilton v. City of Nashwauk, 151 Minn. 534 , , .
Michalson v. Michalson 116 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1962
Michalson v. Michalson 116 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1962
The defendant contends that he has been denied right of visitation of his children and is excused from payment of support money under authority of Eberhart v. Eberhart, 153 Minn. 66 , .
Gannon v. Gannon 102 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1960
Gannon v. Gannon 102 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1960
Eberhart v. Eberhart, 153 Minn. 66 , ; Anderson v. Anderson, 207 Minn. 338 , ; Levell v. Levell, 183 Ore.
Remington Arms Co. v. G. E. M. of St. Louis, Inc. 102 N.W.2d 528 Minn. 1960
Remington Arms Co. v. G. E. M. of St. Louis, Inc. 102 N.W.2d 528 Minn. 1960
Hilton v. City of Nashwauk, 151 Minn. 534 , , , the act provides for a lawful delegation of power.
Grudnosky v. Bislow 88 N.W.2d 847 Minn. 1958
Grudnosky v. Bislow 88 N.W.2d 847 Minn. 1958
State of Illinois Ex Rel. Shannon v. Sterling 80 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1956
State of Illinois Ex Rel. Shannon v. Sterling 80 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1956
duty of support imposed or imposable by law or any court order, decree, or judgment, whether interlocutory, final, or incidental to a proceeding for divorce, legal or judicial separation, separate maintenance, or otherwise.” The Minnesota law as to the liability of the husband for the payment of unpaid installments of support money which have already accrued is set forth in Eberhart v. Eberhart, 153 Minn. 66, 68 , , wherein we said: “The plaintiff has taken the child from the jurisdiction of the
Iverson v. Iverson 66 N.W.2d 549 Minn. 1954
Iverson v. Iverson 66 N.W.2d 549 Minn. 1954
In support of this contention, the defendant directs our attention to Eberhart v. Eberhart, 153 Minn. 66, 68 , , where this court, in holding that a father was relieved from the duty to pay support while his child was kept out of the state by the mother, stated: “The plaintiff has taken the child from the jurisdiction of the court.
State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Village of Mound 48 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1951
State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Village of Mound 48 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1951
Hilton v. City of Nashwauk, 151 Minn. 534 , , ; State ex rel.
Hassler v. Engberg 48 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1951
Hassler v. Engberg 48 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1951
Hilton v. City of Nash-wauk, 151 Minn. 534 , , .
Hasse v. Hasse 45 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 1950
Hasse v. Hasse 45 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 1950
In Eberhart v. Eberhart, 153 Minn. 66, 68 , , we stated: *237 “The plaintiff has taken the child from the jurisdiction of the court.
State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. So-Called Village of St. Anthony 26 N.W.2d 193 Minn. 1947
State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. So-Called Village of St. Anthony 26 N.W.2d 193 Minn. 1947
Hilton v. City of Nashwauk, 151 Minn. 534, 544 , , .
State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Village of North Pole 6 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1942
State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Village of North Pole 6 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1942
Hilton v. City of Nashwauk, 151 Minn. 534, 549 , , , 595: “It is a fundamental requirement that the territory incorporated be so conditioned as to be subjected properly to municipal government.
State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Village of Leetonia 298 N.W. 717 Minn. 1941
Distinguished State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Village of Leetonia 298 N.W. 717 Minn. 1941
Hilton v. City of Nashwauk, 151 Minn. 534, 549 , , .
Anderson v. Anderson 291 N.W. 508 Minn. 1940
Anderson v. Anderson 291 N.W. 508 Minn. 1940
The decision of this court in the present matter Avas so clearly forecast by Eberhart v. Eberhart, 153 Minn. 66 , , especially after the explanation in Fjeld v. Fjeld, 201 Minn. 512 , , that little basis even for speculation remained.
Fjeld v. Fjeld 277 N.W. 203 Minn. 1937
Fjeld v. Fjeld 277 N.W. 203 Minn. 1937
Relying upon Eberhart v. Eberhart, 153 Minn. 66 , , it is urged that defendant should be relieved from contributing to their support as long as they are kept out of the state of Minnesota.
State Ex Rel. Benson v. Board of County Commissioners 243 N.W. 851 Minn. 1932
State Ex Rel. Benson v. Board of County Commissioners 243 N.W. 851 Minn. 1932
Hilton v. City of Nashwauk, 151 Minn. 534 , , .
State Ex Rel. v. So-Called "Village of Minnewashta" 206 N.W. 455 Minn. 1925
State Ex Rel. v. So-Called "Village of Minnewashta" 206 N.W. 455 Minn. 1925
v. City of Nashwauk, 151 Minn. 534 (549), , .
Schulte v. Fitch 202 N.W. 719 Minn. 1925
Schulte v. Fitch 202 N.W. 719 Minn. 1925
State v. City of Nashwauk, 151 Minn. 534 , , ; Wil *192 liams v. Evans, 189 Minn. 32 , , , L. R. A. 1918F, 542; State v. Sullivan, 67 Minn. 379 , ; State v. Andrew Brothers, 144 Minn. 337 , ; State v. Rogers, 97 Minn. 322 , ; Elwell v. Comstock, 99 Minn. 261 , , 7 L. R. A.
In re Norrish 193 N.W. 947 Minn. 1923