Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ganley v. City of Pipestone, 191 N.W. 738.

26 citing documents.

In re the Receivership of United Prairie Bank, Respondent, vs. Molnau Trucking LLC, et al., Defendants, Granite Re, … Minn. 2025
In re the Receivership of United Prairie Bank, Respondent, vs. Molnau Trucking LLC, et al., Defendants, Granite Re, … Minn. 2025
Missouri Valley Steel Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 148 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1966
Missouri Valley Steel Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 148 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1966
If it was due to his deliberate defalcation, that is one of the hazards covered by the bond.” We find the fact situation here distinct from the facts involved in Ganley v. City of Pipestone, 154 Minn. 193 , , relied upon by defendants.
First Nat. Bank of St. Paul v. McHasco Electric, Inc. 141 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1966
First Nat. Bank of St. Paul v. McHasco Electric, Inc. 141 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1966
Co. v. Wurtz, 145 Minn. 438 , , and Ganley v. City of Pipestone, 154 Minn. 193 , .
General Electric Co. v. Anchor Casualty Co. 87 N.W.2d 639 Minn. 1958
General Electric Co. v. Anchor Casualty Co. 87 N.W.2d 639 Minn. 1958
He also stated ( 28 Minn. 89 , ): “* * * It is true that, where the parties have not made any spe *310 cific application of payments, courts will make it according to the justice and equity of the case; * * The rule is again stated in L. J. Mueller Furnace Co. v. Burkhart, 149 Minn. 68 , , in which a number of cases are cited; Ganley v. City of Pipestone, 154 Minn. 193 , ; County of Lyon v. First Nat.
Farmers State Bank v. Anderson 263 N.W. 443 Minn. 1935
Farmers State Bank v. Anderson 263 N.W. 443 Minn. 1935
Co. v. Wurtz, 145 Minn. 438 , ; Ganley v. City of Pipestone, 154 Minn. 193 , ; and Standard Oil Co. v. Remer, 167 Minn. 352 , , the rights and equities of the plaintiff bank were superior to those of Anderson and of the Western Surety Company in the particular fund covered by the order accepted by Anderson and given to the plaintiff.
Investors Syndicate v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. 223 N.W. 139 Minn. 1929
First National Bank of Chisholm v. O'Neil 223 N.W. 298 Minn. 1929
First National Bank of Chisholm v. O'Neil 223 N.W. 298 Minn. 1929
Co. v. Wurtz, 145 Minn. 438 , ; Ganley v. City of Pipestone, 154 Minn. 193 , ; and Standard Oil Co. v. Remer, 167 Minn. 352 , , cited by plaintiff, are not in point.
Investors Syndicate v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. 223 N.W. 139 Minn. 1929
Co. v. Wurtz, 145 Minn. 438 , ; Ganley v. City of Pipestone, 154 Minn. 193 , , and similar cases.
Strimling v. McDonald 210 N.W. 388 Minn. 1926
Strimling v. McDonald 210 N.W. 388 Minn. 1926
Ganley v. City of Pipestone, 154 Minn. 193 , .
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Federal Construction Co. 209 N.W. 911 Minn. 1926
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Federal Construction Co. 209 N.W. 911 Minn. 1926
In Ganley v. City of Pipestone, 154 Minn. 193 , , a similar conclusion was reached upon substantially the same state of facts, the court saying that the agreement between the bank' and *205 the contractors was that they should deposit with the hank the funds received from the city and that the hank should make advances to pay for labor and materials
Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co. 210 N.W. 37 Minn. 1926
Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co. 210 N.W. 37 Minn. 1926
Co. v. Wurtz, 145 Minn. 438 , ; Ganley v. City of Pipestone, 154 Minn. 193 , ; Standard Oil Co. v. Day, 161 Minn. 281 , , 41 A. L. R. 1291; Standard Oil Co. v. Remer, supra, page 352.
Standard Oil Co. v. Remer 209 N.W. 315 Minn. 1926
Standard Oil Co. v. Remer 209 N.W. 315 Minn. 1926
The recent cases of Ganley v. Pipestone, 154 Minn. 193 , , and New Amsterdam Cas.
Barrett Bros. Co. v. County of St. Louis 206 N.W. 49 Minn. 1925
Barrett Bros. Co. v. County of St. Louis 206 N.W. 49 Minn. 1925
Surety Co. v. Berggren, 126 Minn. 188 , ; New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Wurtz, 145 Minn. 438 , ; or Ganley v. City of Pipestone, 154 Minn. 193 , .
Standard Oil Co. v. Day 201 N.W. 410 Minn. 1924
Standard Oil Co. v. Day 201 N.W. 410 Minn. 1924
Co. v. Herber, supra; Ganley v. City of Pipestone, 154 Minn. 193 , .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by