Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co., 186 N.W. 123.

38 citing documents.

Anderson v. Burdick Grain Co. 363 N.W.2d 797 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Anderson v. Burdick Grain Co. 363 N.W.2d 797 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co., 150 Minn. 515, 517-518 , 186 N.W.
Young v. Caspers 249 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 1977
Young v. Caspers 249 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 1977
It is obvious that the stronger the inference of negligence raised by the circumstantial evidence, the more difficult it is to disprove.” In an earlier case, Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co. 150 Minn. 515, 518 , we stated that the legal effect of res ipsa loquitur is to create an inference of negligence: “* * * Whether the res ipsa doctrine, which permits an inference of negligence from the fact of an explosion, should apply is largely a question of how justice in such cases is most practical
Bassett v. Rybak 200 N.W.2d 399 Minn. 1972
Bassett v. Rybak 200 N.W.2d 399 Minn. 1972
Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co. 150 Minn. 515 , , 23 A. L. R. 479; Rosenfield v. Arrol, 44 Minn. 395 , .
Segal v. Bloom Brothers Co. 82 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1957
Segal v. Bloom Brothers Co. 82 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1957
Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co. 150 Minn. 515 , , 23 A. L. R. 479; Rosenfield v. Arrol, 44 Minn. 395 , .
Seeden v. Great Northern Railway Co. 65 N.W.2d 178 Minn. 1954
Seeden v. Great Northern Railway Co. 65 N.W.2d 178 Minn. 1954
Co. 161 Minn. 45 , ; Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co. 150 Minn. 515 , , 23 A. L. R. 479; Martin v. Southern Pac.
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. JR Clark Co. 59 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1953
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. JR Clark Co. 59 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1953
318, 90 P. (2d) 1067 ; cf. Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co. 150 Minn. 515 , , 23 A. L. R. 479; 30 Am.
Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 47 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1951
Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 47 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1951
Heffter v. Northern States Power Co. 173 Minn. 215 , ; Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co. 150 Minn. 515 , , 23 A. L. R. 479.
White v. Maurice L. Rothschild & Co. 11 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1943
White v. Maurice L. Rothschild & Co. 11 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1943
The case of Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co. 150 Minn. 515 , , 23 A. L. R. 479, arose from the explosion of the tenant’s steam boiler damaging the landlord’s building.
Peterson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. 291 N.W. 705 Minn. 1940
Peterson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. 291 N.W. 705 Minn. 1940
Whether it should apply is “largely a question of how justice in such cases is most practically and fairly administered.” Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co. 150 Minn. 515, 518 , , 23 A. L. R. 479.
State v. Sprague 276 N.W. 744 Minn. 1937
State v. Sprague 276 N.W. 744 Minn. 1937
Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co. 150 Minn. 515 , , 23 A. L. R. 479.
Birdsall v. Duluth-Superior Transit Co. 267 N.W. 363 Minn. 1936
Birdsall v. Duluth-Superior Transit Co. 267 N.W. 363 Minn. 1936
5 Wigmore, EAddence (2 ed.) § 2509; Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co. 150 Minn. 515 , , 23 A. L. R. 479.
Hector Construction Co. Inc. v. Butler 260 N.W. 496 Minn. 1935
Hector Construction Co. Inc. v. Butler 260 N.W. 496 Minn. 1935
Heffter v. Northern States Power Co. 173 Minn. 215 , ; Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co. 150 Minn. 515 , , 23 A. L. R. 479.
Cullen v. Pearson 253 N.W. 117 Minn. 1934
Cullen v. Pearson 253 N.W. 117 Minn. 1934
The well considered case of Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co. 150 Minn. 515 , 186 N.W.
Bibeau v. Fred W. Pearce Corp. 217 N.W. 874 Minn. 1928
Bibeau v. Fred W. Pearce Corp. 217 N.W. 874 Minn. 1928
104 , 189 S. W. 805 , L. R. A. 1917B, 1091, where the application of the rule was rejected because: (1) The state of Missouri holds the doctrine inapplicable where specific acts of negligence are pleaded — a rule, as pointed out in Heffter v. Northern States Power Co. supra, p. 215, which was rejected by us in Kleinman v. Banner *335 Laundry Co. 150 Minn. 515 , , where general negligence is alleged, as in the instant case; and (2) the proofs failed to show an unusual occurrence.
Heffter v. Northern States Power Co. 217 N.W. 102 Minn. 1927
Heffter v. Northern States Power Co. 217 N.W. 102 Minn. 1927
Heffter v. Northern States Power Co. 217 N.W. 102 Minn. 1927
Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co. 150 Minn. 515 , , 23 A. L. R. 479.
Heffter v. Northern States Power Co. 217 N.W. 102 Minn. 1927
Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co. 150 Minn. 515 , 186 N.W.
Ryan v. St. Paul Union Depot Co. 210 N.W. 32 Minn. 1926
Ryan v. St. Paul Union Depot Co. 210 N.W. 32 Minn. 1926
1918E, 256; Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co. 150 Minn. 515 , , 23 A. L. R. 479.
Nelson v. Zamboni 204 N.W. 943 Minn. 1925
Nelson v. Zamboni 204 N.W. 943 Minn. 1925
We consider the case ruled) by Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co. 150 Minn. 515 , , 23 A. L. R. 479.
Mathews v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 202 N.W. 896 Minn. 1925
Mathews v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 202 N.W. 896 Minn. 1925
Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co. 150 Minn. 515 , , 23 A. L. R. 479.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by