Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Morris, 182 N.W. 721.

30 citing documents.

State v. Hooks 752 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Hooks 752 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Morris, 149 Minn. 41 , 182 N.W.
State v. Holbrook 233 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1975
State v. Holbrook 233 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1975
And, see, State v. Morris, 149 Minn. 41 , upholding the jury’s power to find a defendant guilty of a lesser offense even though the evidence is such that the defendant, if guilty at all, is guilty of the greater offense.
State v. Gafner 168 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1969
State v. Gafner 168 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1969
State v. Nelson, 91 Minn. 143 , ; State v. Morris, 149 Minn. 41 , .
State v. Jordan 136 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1965
State v. Jordan 136 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1965
See, State v. Morris, 149 Minn. 41 , .
State v. Mathiasen 127 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1964
State v. Mathiasen 127 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1964
17 See, State v. Oelschlegel, 173 Minn. 598 , ; State v. Jackson, 198 Minn. 111 , ; State v. Morris, 149 Minn. 41 , ; State v. Christianson, 131 Minn. 276 , .
State v. Hanson 123 N.W.2d 173 Minn. 1963
State v. Hanson 123 N.W.2d 173 Minn. 1963
A careful reading of State v. Morris, 149 Minn. 41 , , relied upon by defendant, indicates a number of distinctions.
Simon v. Carroll 62 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1954
Simon v. Carroll 62 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1954
See, State v. Lee, 22 Minn. 407 ; Bingham v. Bernard, 36 Minn. 114 , ; State v. Lockerby, 50 Minn. 363 , ; State v. Morris, 149 Minn. 41 , .
State v. Pankratz 57 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1953
State v. Pankratz 57 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1953
State v. Nelson, 91 Minn. 143 , ; State v. Morris, 149 Minn. 41 , .
State v. Gavle 48 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 1951
State v. Gavle 48 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 1951
Defendant submitted a request asking that the trial court instruct the jury “that the only permissible verdicts are guilty of the crime of murder in the first degree, as charged, or not guilty.” This request was apparently submitted pursuant to the advice contained in State v. Morris, 149 Minn. 41, 45 , , 723: “* * * If, * * * the accused desires to relinquish his chance of escaping with a conviction of a lesser offense in the hope that the jury will refuse to convict him of a greater, he should
State v. Stevens 238 N.W. 673 Minn. 1931
State v. Stevens 238 N.W. 673 Minn. 1931
State v. Nelson, 91 Minn. 143 , ; State v. Morris, 149 Minn. 41 , .
State v. Barnard 223 N.W. 452 Minn. 1929
State v. Barnard 223 N.W. 452 Minn. 1929
839; State v. Morris, 149 Minn. 41 , ; State v. Cavett, 171 Minn. 222 , ; State v. Humphrey, 173 Minn. 410 , .
State v. Kaufman 214 N.W. 785 Minn. 1927
State v. Kaufman 214 N.W. 785 Minn. 1927
State v. Morris, 149 Minn. 41 , .
State v. Tuomi 208 N.W. 528 Minn. 1926
Followed State v. Tuomi 208 N.W. 528 Minn. 1926
We follow State v. Morris, 149 Minn. 41 , , and hold that the defendant cannot now claim that only the first degree should have been submitted.
State v. Nelson 208 N.W. 129 Minn. 1926
State v. Nelson 208 N.W. 129 Minn. 1926
The refusal of the testimony cannot be held without prejudice, within State v. Morris, 149 Minn. 41 , , where a large number of witnesses were permitted to testify, and one was excluded.
State v. Abdo 183 N.W. 143 Minn. 1921
State v. Abdo 183 N.W. 143 Minn. 1921
G. S. 1913, §§ 8476, 9213; State v. Smith, 56 Minn. 78 , ; State, v. Gaularpp, 144 Minn. 86 , ; State v. Brinkman, 145 Minn. 18 , ; State v. Morris, supra, p. 41, .