Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re the Assessment of Benefits, Costs & Expenses, 181 N.W. 859.

25 citing documents.

James M. Carlson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. Paul 884 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2016
First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. Paul 884 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2016
See In re Concord Street Assessment, 148 Minn. 329, 331-32, 181 N.W.
Dosedel v. City of Ham Lake 414 N.W.2d 751 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Dosedel v. City of Ham Lake 414 N.W.2d 751 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Paul, 148 Minn. 329, 332 , 181 N.W.
Buettner v. City of St. Cloud 277 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1979
Buettner v. City of St. Cloud 277 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1979
Paul, 148 Minn. 329 , 181 N.W.
Village of Edina v. Joseph 119 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1962
Village of Edina v. Joseph 119 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1962
In In re Assessment for Paving Concord Street, 148 Minn. 329 , , and again in the Qvale case we said that the principle that the apportionment of assessments is a legislative function is to be given effect.
Seidlitz v. County of Faribault 55 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1952
Seidlitz v. County of Faribault 55 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1952
In accord, see In re Assessment for Paving Concord Street, 148 Minn. 329, 331 , , in which we said: “* * * But it is not to be overlooked that charging private property with a lien for public improvements is a taking for public use, and that, if property not benefited is assessed, or if an assessment is greatly in excess of benefits, the taking is without just compensation an
Qvale v. City of Willmar 25 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1946
Qvale v. City of Willmar 25 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1946
v. Bremner, 190 Minn. 534 , , ; In re Improvement of Third Street, 185 Minn. 170 , ; In re Assessment for Widening East Fourth Street, 173 Minn. 67 , ; In re Improvement of Lake of the Isles Park, 152 Minn. 29, 36 , ; Hughes v. Farnsworth, 137 Minn. 295 , 163 N. W. *55 525; In re Assessment for Paving Concord Street, 148 Minn. 329 , ; City of Duluth v. Davidson, 97 Minn. 378 , ; State ex rel.
In Re Improvement of Third Street, St. Paul 240 N.W. 355 Minn. 1932
In Re Improvement of Third Street, St. Paul 240 N.W. 355 Minn. 1932
Hughes v. Farnsworth, 137 Minn. 295 , ; In re Concord Street, 118 Minn. 329 , .
In Re Appeal of Meyer 223 N.W. 135 Minn. 1929
In Re Appeal of Meyer 223 N.W. 135 Minn. 1929
In re Assessment for Paving Concord Street, 148 Minn. 329 , *Page 243 181 N.W.
In Re Assessment for Widening East Fourth Street in St. Paul 216 N.W. 907 Minn. 1927
In Re Assessment for Widening East Fourth Street in St. Paul 216 N.W. 907 Minn. 1927
*70 148 Minn. 329 , ; Armour v. Village of Litchfield, 152 Minn. 382 , ; In re Assessment for Paving Mississippi River Blvd.
In Re Assessment for Paving Mississippi River Boulevard 211 N.W. 9 Minn. 1926
In Re Assessment for Paving Mississippi River Boulevard 211 N.W. 9 Minn. 1926
1916B, 189; In Re Assessment for Paving Concord Street, 148 Minn. 329 , ; Armour v. Village of Litchfield, 152 Minn. 382 , .
Armour v. Village of Litchfield 188 N.W. 1006 Minn. 1922
Armour v. Village of Litchfield 188 N.W. 1006 Minn. 1922
In Re Assessment for Paving Concord Street, 148 Minn. 329, 1 .
In re Improvement of Lake of the Isles Park 188 N.W. 54 Minn. 1922
In re Improvement of Lake of the Isles Park 188 N.W. 54 Minn. 1922
1918E, 835; In re Concord Street, 148 Minn. 329 , .