Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Campbell v. Motion Picture Machine Operators, 186 N.W. 787.

27 citing documents.

John P. Norusis v. City of Marine on Saint Croix Minn. Ct. App. 2024
John P. Norusis v. City of Marine on Saint Croix Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Operators, -89 (Minn. 1922) (quoting section 8364 of the General Statutes of 1913).
Adam C. Steele, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Operators, (“That the award may be designated as a fine does not change its character.”).
City of Orono, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Hanson v. Thom 636 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Hanson v. Thom 636 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Operators’, 151 Minn. 238, 242 , 186 N.W.
Bowman v. Bowman 493 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Bowman v. Bowman 493 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Operators, 151 Minn. 238, 242 , 186 N.W.
Time-Share Systems, Inc. v. Schmidt 397 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Time-Share Systems, Inc. v. Schmidt 397 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See also Campbell v. Motion Picture Machine Operators, 151 Minn. 238, 242 , 186 N.W.
Westgor v. Grimm 381 N.W.2d 877 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Westgor v. Grimm 381 N.W.2d 877 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Campbell v. Motion Picture Machine Operators, 151 Minn. 238, 242 , 186 N.W.
Peterson v. Peterson 153 N.W.2d 825 Minn. 1967
Peterson v. Peterson 153 N.W.2d 825 Minn. 1967
See, Gardner v. Conway, 234 Minn. 468 , 48 N. W. (2d) 788 ; Campbell v. Motion Picture Machine Operators, 151 Minn. 238 , ; State ex rel.
Swift & Co. v. United Packing House Workers of America 37 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 1949
Swift & Co. v. United Packing House Workers of America 37 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 1949
With reference to plaintiff’s contention that the only right of review here is by certiorari, this court said in Campbell v. Motion P. M. Operators, 151 Minn. 238, 239 , , 788: “Proceedings against persons charged with contempt of court are of two *573 classes: Those prosecuted to maintain and vindicate the authority of the court; and those prosecuted to make effective the remedy given to a private party.
Paulson v. Johnson 7 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1943
Paulson v. Johnson 7 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1943
Campbell v. Motion P. M. Operators, 151 Minn. 238 , .
Spannaus v. Lueck 279 N.W. 216 Minn. 1938
Criticized Spannaus v. Lueck 279 N.W. 216 Minn. 1938
Red River P. G. Assn. v. Bernardy, 128 Minn. 153 , ; Campbell v. Motion P. M. Operators, 151 Minn. 238 , ; Proper v. Proper, 188 Minn. 15 , ; State ex rel.
Hanson v. Hall 279 N.W. 227 Minn. 1938
Sessions v. Sessions 226 N.W. 211 Minn. 1929
Sessions v. Sessions 226 N.W. 211 Minn. 1929
583 ; Campbell v. Motion P. M. Operators, 151 Minn. 238 , 186 N.W.
Cohen v. Mirviss Manufacturing Co. 216 N.W. 606 Minn. 1927
Cohen v. Mirviss Manufacturing Co. 216 N.W. 606 Minn. 1927
151 Minn. 238 , , and cases cited.
State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 191 N.W. 1004 Minn. 1923
State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 191 N.W. 1004 Minn. 1923
As to this, the case is ruled by Campbell v. Motion Picture Machine Operators, 151 Minn. 238 , , and the cases cited in the opinion.