Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Dolliver, 184 N.W. 848.

25 citing documents.

State v. Carver 363 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Carver 363 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
355, 356 (1888)], and State v. Dolliver, [ 150 Minn. 155 , 184 N.W.
State v. Demmings 246 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1976
State v. Demmings 246 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1976
See, e. g., State v. Dolliver, 150 Minn. 155
State v. Shetsky 40 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1949
State v. Shetsky 40 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1949
244; State v. Dolliver, 150 Minn. 155 , ; 2 Dunnell, Dig.
State v. Peery 28 N.W.2d 851 Minn. 1947
State v. Oslund 273 N.W. 76 Minn. 1937
State v. Oslund 273 N.W. 76 Minn. 1937
State v. Dolliver, 150 Minn. 155 , .
State v. Sweeney 231 N.W. 225 Minn. 1930
State v. Sweeney 231 N.W. 225 Minn. 1930
The court refused defendant’s request to instruct the jury that character evidence “may be sufficient of itself to raise a reason *462 able doubt of the guilt of the defendant.” In State v. Dolliver, 150 Minn. 155 , , we held that it was error to charge the jury that “good reputation of the defendant is not of itself a sufficient fact from which a reasonable doubt of guilt may arise.” But in State v. Dolliver, 154 Minn. 297 , , we held that it was not error to refuse a request similar to the one
State v. Barnard 223 N.W. 452 Minn. 1929
State v. Barnard 223 N.W. 452 Minn. 1929
State v. Dolliver, 150 Minn. 155 , .
State v. Cavett 213 N.W. 920 Minn. 1927
State v. Friedson 211 N.W. 950 Minn. 1927
State v. Friedson 211 N.W. 950 Minn. 1927
State v. Dolliver, 150 Minn. 155 , ; State v. Dolliver, 154 Minn. 297 , ; State v. Nelson, 166 Minn. 371 , ; State v. Tuomi, 167 Minn. 74 , .
State v. Tuomi 208 N.W. 528 Minn. 1926
State v. Tuomi 208 N.W. 528 Minn. 1926
State v. Nelson, 166 Minn. 371 , ; State v. Dolliver, 150 Minn. 155 , , and cases cited.
State v. Nelson 208 N.W. 129 Minn. 1926
State v. Nelson 208 N.W. 129 Minn. 1926
dmissible to support the original presumption of innocence, and is to go to the jury, and be considered by them, in connection with all the other evidence in the case.” In State v. Hutchinson, 121 Minn. 405 , , Judge Bunn said: “Evidence of good character goes to the probabilities of defendant’s guilt, and bears on the general question of guilty or not guilty.” In State v. Dolliver, 150 Minn. 155 , , Judge Lees, reviewing the prior cases, said: “Such evidence is received on the theory that a per
State v. Friend 191 N.W. 926 Minn. 1923
State v. Dolliver 191 N.W. 594 Minn. 1923
State v. Dolliver 191 N.W. 594 Minn. 1923
The case was here before and is reported in 150 Minn. 155 , .
State v. Jensen 186 N.W. 581 Minn. 1922
State v. Jensen 186 N.W. 581 Minn. 1922
State v. *181 Connelly, supra; State v. Dolliver, 150 Minn. 155 , ; People v. Davey, 179 N. Y. 345 , 72 N. E. 244 .