Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Power v. Nordstrom, 184 N.W. 967.

24 citing documents.

Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, et al., Minn. 2020
ome rule charter for its government.”); Minn. Stat. § 410.07 (2018) (“[A city charter] may provide for the establishment and administration of all departments of a city government, and for the regulation of all local municipal functions, as fully as the legislature might have done before home rule charters for cities were authorized by constitutional amendment in 1896.”); , 969 (Minn. 1921) (“Every business and occupation is subject to the reasonable exercise of the police power of the municipal
Graco, Inc., Minn. 2020
at 816 (citing Power v. Nordstrom , ).
Bruce Clark, et al., Minn. 2019
7 The City’s enactment of these ordinances, none of whi ch are subject to the referendum petition, demonstrates that it is reasonably possible for the City to comply with the statutory mandate to ensure that residents have waste collection services even if Ordinance No. 18 -39 is subject to a referendum petition.8 (finding 6 Non-residential building owners must also “ensure that an adequate number of approved containers” for garbage are available for use by building occupants.
Graco, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis 925 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Graco, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis 925 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d at 816 *271 (quoting Power v.Nordstrom , 150 Minn. 228 , 184 N.W.
Bicking v. City of Minneapolis 891 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 2017
Bicking v. City of Minneapolis 891 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 2017
Power v. Nordstrom, 150 Minn. 228, 232 , 184 N.W.
Lilly v. City of Minneapolis 527 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Westrum 380 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Westrum 380 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Power v. Nordstrom, 150 Minn. 228, 232 , 184 N.W.
St. Paul Citizens for Human Rights v. City Council of St. Paul 289 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1979
St. Paul Citizens for Human Rights v. City Council of St. Paul 289 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1979
Power v. Nordstrom, 150 Minn. 228 , 184 N.W.
Lewis Ex Rel. Quinn v. Ford Motor Co. 282 N.W.2d 874 Minn. 1979
Lewis Ex Rel. Quinn v. Ford Motor Co. 282 N.W.2d 874 Minn. 1979
Power v. Nordstrom, 150 Minn. 228 , 184 N.W.
FRANKLIN THEATRE CORPORATION v. City of Minneapolis 198 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 1972
FRANKLIN THEATRE CORPORATION v. City of Minneapolis 198 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 1972
See, Power v. Nordstrom, 150 Minn. 228 , Bainbridge v. City of Minneapolis, 131 Minn. 195 , State ex rel.
Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of Richfield 143 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1966
Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of Richfield 143 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1966
See, Power v. Nordstrom, 150 Minn. 228 , , 18 A. L. R. 733; Annotations, 29 A. L. R. 397, 400, and 37 A. L. R. 575.
City of Duluth v. Northland Greyhound Lines 52 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1952
City of Duluth v. Northland Greyhound Lines 52 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1952
Jur., Municipal Corporations, §§ 277, 279; Power v. Nordstrom, 150 Minn. 228 , , 18 A. L. R. 733.
Mattson v. Flynn 13 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1944
Mattson v. Flynn 13 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1944
Power v. Nordstrom, 150 Minn. 228 , , 18 A. L. R. 733, and cases cited; Equitable Holding Co. v. Equitable B. & L. Assn. 202 Minn. 529 , .
Equitable Holding Co. v. Equitable Building & Loan Ass'n 279 N.W. 736 Minn. 1938
Equitable Holding Co. v. Equitable Building & Loan Ass'n 279 N.W. 736 Minn. 1938
Ordinarily the “public policy of the state should be determined by the legislature and not by the courts.” This is illustrated in Power v. Nordstrom, 150 Minn. 228, 232 , , 18 A. L. R. 733, and the many cases therein cited.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by