DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co., 183 N.W. 977.

24 citing documents.

  • Voight v. Rettinger Transportation, Inc. 306 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 1981
  • Voight v. Rettinger Transportation, Inc. 306 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 1981
    Just as injuries sustained as a consequence of the necessity of sleeping in hotels, Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co., 150 Minn. 1 , 183 N.W.
  • Houle v. Stearns-Rogers Manufacturing Co. 157 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1968
  • Snyder v. General Paper Corporation 152 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1967
  • Snyder v. General Paper Corporation 152 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1967
    In Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co. 150 Minn. 1 , , 20 A. L. R. 316, a salesman was killed while trying to escape a hotel fire.
  • Brusven v. Ballord 14 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1944
  • Distinguished Brusven v. Ballord 14 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1944
    We are of the opinion, that the industrial commission could justifiably find from the way in which the Ewald Bros, partnership had supported game contests of their employes that it was deemed by them an essential part of their business; hence, that respondent’s accidental injury arose out of and in the course of his employment.” Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co. 150 Minn. 1 , , 20 A. L. R. 316, cited by relator, is readily distinguishable from the instant case.
  • Derosier v. Jay W. Craig Co. 14 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1944
  • Fitzgerald v. Economic Laboratory, Inc. 12 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1943
  • Fitzgerald v. Economic Laboratory, Inc. 12 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1943
    McCarthy Brothers Co. v. District Court, 141 Minn. 61 , ; Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co. 150 Minn. 1 , , 20 A. L. R. 316; Krekelberg v. M. A. Floyd Co. 166 Minn. 149 , ; Bradtmiller v. Liquid Carbonic Co. 173 Minn. 481 , ; Brameld v. Albert Dickinson Co. 186 Minn. 89 , ; Rice v. Keystone View Co. 210 Minn. 227 , .
  • Rice v. Keystone View Co. 297 N.W. 841 Minn. 1941
  • Rice v. Keystone View Co. 297 N.W. 841 Minn. 1941
    McCarthy Bros. Co. v. District Court, 141 Minn. 61 , ; Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co. 150 Minn. 1 , , 20 A. L. R. 316; Krekelberg v. M. A. Floyd Co. 166 Minn. 149 , ; Bradtmiller v. Liquid Carbonic Co. 173 Minn. 481 , ; Brameld v. Albert Dickinson Co. 186 Minn. 89 , .
  • Roberts v. Ray Bell Film Co. 288 N.W. 591 Minn. 1939
  • Roberts v. Ray Bell Film Co. 288 N.W. 591 Minn. 1939
    “the important fact is that he left this room and went to his own room and then while on the way to the lavatory * * Avas injured.” It is therefore his claim that “he was then again in the same situation and should be treated in the same manner as if he had immediately gone to bed and the hotel had burned down while he Avas asleep.” He cites and heavily relies upon Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co. 150 Minn. 1 , , 20 A. L. R. 316, and other cases of like import.
  • Brameld v. Albert Dickinson Co. 242 N.W. 465 Minn. 1932
  • Brameld v. Albert Dickinson Co. 242 N.W. 465 Minn. 1932
    Co. v. District Court, 141 Minn. 348 , ; Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co. 150 Minn. 1 , , 20 A. L. R. 316; Bradtmiller v. Liquid Carbonic Co. 173 Minn. 481 , ; 6 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
  • Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 225 N.W. 428 Minn. 1929
  • Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 225 N.W. 428 Minn. 1929
    McCarthy Bros. Co. v. *506 District Court, 141 Minn. 61 , ; Hansen v. N. W. Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , ; Wold v. Chevrolet Motor Co. 147 Minn. 17 , ; Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co. 150 Minn. 1 , , 20 A. L. R. 516; Bookman v. Lyle C. & R. E Co. 153 Minn. 479 , ; Reese v. National Surety Co 162 Minn. 493 , ; Meyer v. Royalton Oil Co. 167 Minn 515, ; Giliotti v. Hoffman Catering Co. 246 N. Y. 279 158 N. E. 621 , 56 A. L. R. 500; note to Colarullo v. W
  • Krause v. Swartwood 218 N.W. 555 Minn. 1928
  • Krause v. Swartwood 218 N.W. 555 Minn. 1928
    Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co. 150 Minn. 1 , , 20 A. L. R. 316.
  • Bradtmiller v. Liquid Carbonic Co. 217 N.W. 680 Minn. 1928
  • Bradtmiller v. Liquid Carbonic Co. 217 N.W. 680 Minn. 1928
    Chambers v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205 , , 3 A. L. R. 1347; Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co. 150 Minn. 1 , , 20 A. L. R. 316; State ex rel.
  • Angell v. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co. 210 N.W. 1004 Minn. 1926
  • Angell v. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co. 210 N.W. 1004 Minn. 1926
    State v. District Court, 139 Minn. 205 , , 3 A. L. R. 1347; State v. District Court, 141 Minn. 61 , ; Stansberry v. Monitor S. Co. 150 Minn. 1 , , 20 A. L. R. 316.