Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Platzer v. Beardsley, 183 N.W. 956.

43 citing documents.

Mize v. Kendall 621 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Mize v. Kendall 621 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Platzer v. Beardsley, 149 Minn. 435, 438 , 183 N.W.
In Re the Welfare of M.G. 407 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of M.G. 407 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Platzer v. Beardsley, 149 Minn. 435, 439 , 183 N.W.
In Re the Custody of N.M.O. 399 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Custody of N.M.O. 399 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Platzer v. Beardsley, 149 Minn. 435 , 183 N.W.
Toro Co. v. Commissioner of Economic SEC. 356 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of ELH 356 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of ELH 356 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Platzer v. Beardsley, 149 Minn. 435, 438 , 183 N.W.
Wallin v. Wallin 187 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1971
Wallin v. Wallin 187 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1971
Platzer v. Beardsley, 149 Minn. 435 , .” The principle that the custody of young children is ordinarily best vested in the mother, vital and established as it may be, is distinctly subordinate to the controlling principle that the overriding consideration in custody proceedings is the child’s welfare.
In Re Alsdurf's Petition 133 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1965
State ex rel. Sadler v. Alsdurf 133 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1965
In Re Alsdurf's Petition 133 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1965
Platzer v. Beardsley, 149 Minn. 435, 438 , 183 N.W.
State ex rel. Sadler v. Alsdurf 133 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1965
Platzer v. Beardsley, 149 Minn. 435, 438 , ; State ex rel.
In Re Welfare of Barron 268 Minn. 48 Minn. 1964
In Re Welfare of Barron 268 Minn. 48 Minn. 1964
Platzer v. Beardsley, 149 Minn. 435 , 183 N.W.
In Re Dependency of Klugman 97 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1959
In Re Dependency of Klugman 97 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1959
Platzer v. Beardsley, 149 Minn. 435 , 438 , 183 N.W.
State Ex Rel. Jaroszewski v. Prestidge 81 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1957
State Ex Rel. Jaroszewski v. Prestidge 81 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1957
Platzer v. Beardsley, 149 Minn. 435 , .
State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Whaley 75 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1956
State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Whaley 75 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1956
Platzer v. Beardsley, 149 Minn. 435, 438 , , we held that there is a presumption that a mother is a fit and suitable person to be entrusted with the care of her child and the burden is upon the contestant to overcome the presumption by satisfactory evidence, and we observed: “* * * The ties by which mother and child are bound together
Kienlen v. Kienlen 34 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 1948
Kienlen v. Kienlen 34 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 1948
Platzer v. Beardsley, 149 Minn. 435 , ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Merritt v. Eldred 29 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1947
State Ex Rel. Merritt v. Eldred 29 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1947
Platzer v. Beardsley, 149 Minn. 435, 438 , , this court held that there is a presumption that a parent is fit to have the custody of his child.
State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Sanders 10 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1943
State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Sanders 10 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1943
Platzer v. Beardsley, 149 Minn. 435 , ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Vik v. Sivertson 260 N.W. 522 Minn. 1935
State Ex Rel. Vik v. Sivertson 260 N.W. 522 Minn. 1935
Platzer v. Beardsley, 149 Minn. 435 , ; State ex rel.
In Re Adoption of Anderson 248 N.W. 657 Minn. 1933
Dwinnell v. Fallon 248 N.W. 657 Minn. 1933
Dwinnell v. Fallon 248 N.W. 657 Minn. 1933
Platzer v. Beardsley, 149 Minn. 435 , .
In Re Adoption of Anderson 248 N.W. 657 Minn. 1933
Platzer v. Beardsley, 149 Minn. 435 , 183 N.W.
State Ex Rel. Herniman v. Markson 244 N.W. 687 Minn. 1932
State Ex Rel. Herniman v. Markson 244 N.W. 687 Minn. 1932
Platzer v. Beardsley, 149 Minn. 435 , ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Henning v. Gundvaldson 211 N.W. 310 Minn. 1926
State Ex Rel. Henning v. Gundvaldson 211 N.W. 310 Minn. 1926
Platzer v. Beardsley, 149 Minn. 435 , 183 * State ex rel.
State ex rel. Mattes v. Peterson 194 N.W. 326 Minn. 1923
State ex rel. Mattes v. Peterson 194 N.W. 326 Minn. 1923
A case substantially similar in its facts was recently before the court, reported in 149 Minn. 435 , , where the legal rights of the respective parties are clearly stated by Judge Lees, with a citation of pertinent authorities.
Spratt v. Spratt 185 N.W. 509 Minn. 1921
Spratt v. Spratt 185 N.W. 509 Minn. 1921
State v. Beardsley, 149 Minn. 435 , , and cases therein cited.